AUTOMATION HISTORY

Add the following snippet to your HTML:<iframe frameborder='0' height='385' scrolling='no' src='https://www.hackster.io/HiwonderRobot/from-chatbots-to-bodies-embodied-ai-on-rosorin-pro-8e3215/embed' width='350'></iframe> Stop restricting AI to a screen. Learn how ROSOrin Pro gives LLMs a physical presence to sense, move, and interact with the 3D world. 🤖🌍 Read up about this project on Stop restricting AI to a screen. Learn how ROSOrin Pro gives LLMs a physical presence to sense, move, and interact with the 3D world. 🤖🌍 The biggest hurdle in modern robotics isn't the AI—it’s the "hand-off" between software logic and hardware execution. This is why the ROSOrin Pro is designed to be OpenClaw Ready out of the box. OpenClaw is more than just a gripper standard; it is a unified framework that allows Large Language Models (LLMs) to communicate with physical actuators. By being "OpenClaw Ready," the ROSOrin Pro ensures that developers can skip the nightmare of low-level driver integration. Whether you are deploying a custom GPT-based agent or a local Llama 3 node, the platform provides a plug-and-play interface for complex 3D manipulation, allowing your AI to focus on the "Thinking" while the hardware handles the "Doing." Why does "Embodied AI" matter? A chatbot can describe how to pick up a cup, but it lacks a "nervous system" to feel the weight or see the steam. Embodied AI is about Spatial Grounding—linking digital tokens to physical coordinates. The ROSOrin Pro serves as the ultimate development sandbox for this evolution. Powered by the NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano or Raspberry Pi 5, it provides the high-performance edge computing necessary to run multimodal models that perceive, reason, and act in real-time. It transforms a static AI into a mobile agent capable of navigating human environments. An intelligent agent is only as smart as its data. The ROSOrin Pro utilizes a sophisticated sensory suite to "ground" its intelligence: To ensure the AI’s "thoughts" translate into fluid motion, the ROSOrin Pro runs on ROS 2 Humble. This middleware acts as the robot's backbone, managing the high-speed communication between the AI vision nodes and the 6-DOF robotic arm. With built-in Inverse Kinematics (IK), the ROSOrin Pro can calculate complex trajectories on the fly. When the AI decides to "Move the red block to the bin," the ROS 2 stack autonomously plans the arm’s path, avoiding obstacles and maintaining balance, effectively acting as the robot’s "motor cortex." Embodied AI is a two-way street. Using the onboard AI Voice Interaction Module, the ROSOrin Pro creates a multimodal feedback loop. It doesn't just take orders; it interacts. If an object is out of reach or too heavy, the robot can communicate this back to the user or the LLM to refine the task. This level of "Reasoning-in-the-Loop" is what separates a smart car from a true autonomous assistant. The era of physical AI agents is just beginning, and we want you to lead the charge. We are excited to announce that our comprehensive OpenClaw gameplay tutorials for the ROSOrin Pro are launching soon! These upcoming guides will cover everything from local LLM deployment to 3D visual grasping algorithms. Don’t miss out on the next wave of Embodied AI: Follow Hiwonder on GitHub to access our open-source codebases and pre-configured ROS 2 images. Watch our Hackster Profile for free project guides and cutting-edge developer resources. Hackster.io, an Avnet Community © 2026

The ground vehicle ULTRA from Ukrainian company Overland Al allows operators to deploy multiple drones with no human present. Courtesy OVERLAND AI Stay Connected Patrick Tucker NATO is studying how to use ground and air robots to replace human soldiers in assaults, something Ukraine has been doing for more than a year. But that hasn’t stopped Russia’s continuous assault with its own, increasingly autonomous one-way attack drones. On Tuesday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky made a social-media splash with a video describing a historic first from last July: a skirmish in which Russian troops surrendered to Ukrainian robots. “The future is already on the front line—and Ukraine is building it,” Zelenskyy said in the video, adding that Ukrainian robotics companies “have already carried out more than 22,000 missions on the front in just three months.” Still, the Ukrainian president offered far fewer details than did Ukraine’s 3rd Assault Brigade in its own July 2025 post. “Enemy fortifications were attacked” by first-person-view aerial drones and ground robots armed with explosives and made by Nazemnyi Robotychnyi Kompleks, the post said. “The next robot was already approaching the destroyed dugout when the enemy, in order to avoid being blown up, announced surrender. The occupiers who survived were taken to our lines by ‘birds’ [aerial drones] and, according to the regulations, taken prisoner.” “The operation was carried out without infantry and without losses on our side,” it said. “The occupiers surrendered to the ground robots of the Third Assault!” Ukraine’s ground-robot game advanced quickly in the following months, said Olena Kryzshanivska, a senior editor at the NATO Association of Canada who first relayed the news to English-language audiences. “Already…[by the] beginning of this year, we saw several documented cases when UGVs [unmanned ground vehicles] were used for strike missions. They were either delivering grenades [or] they were sometimes … attacking trenches, attacking Russian troops,” Kryzshanivska said in February during a podcast with CNAS adjunct senior fellow Sam Bendett. That sort of combined robotic fast maneuver is one of the ways Ukraine is forcing a reconsideration of decades of military doctrine, and NATO is taking notice. In February, its Allied Command Transformation announced the extension of a study on Force Lethality Enhancement to build out “a few practical force options and test them against realistic scenarios to see what works, and what it would take to use them on operations.” Another alliance effort to integrate ground robots, part of the multidomain Task Force X, is being led by Brig. Gen. Chris Gent, NATO deputy chief of staff transformation and integration. Venture capitalists are taking note as well. Eric Brock of Ondas Capital told Defense One in January that his firm is investing in “ground robots that are tailored towards defense and homeland security but also critical infrastructure protection in certain places.” Challenges The biggest constraint in using first-person-view drones is that an operator can generally fly just one at a time. But the drone can fly itself to waypoints, loiter in the air, and reconnect after brief communications interruptions. Ground robots, by contrast, need constant attention because navigation remains a technical challenge, John Hardie, of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, told reporters in February. And UGV operators must also stay in frequent contact with the operators of the aerial drones above. “My understanding is that they've experimented with autonomous navigation, but it’s especially difficult with [unmanned ground vehicles] for that to be reliable. So I don't think they're there yet,” Hardie said. Ukraine has also been hunting for alternatives to GPS, which is jammable. Since 2023, it has been experimenting with visual- and terrain-matching systems and other AI-powered ideas for long-range navigation, Hardie said. Russia, too, has carried out robotic operations in large volumes. But they’re limited to strikes with one-way attack drones like Shaheds and, occasionally evacuation of the wounded, not taking positions. The Lancet drones produced by Russia’s ZALA company are guided on final approach to their targets by matching camera imagery to preloaded maps. It works well enough—because Russian forces place less of a premium on collateral damage or striking the right target. For Ukrainians, the goal is greater autonomy, allowing one operator to preside over fleets of ground and air robots but with confidence that they will perform the mission assigned, hit the target that they’re supposed to hit and not simply whatever happens to be there when the drone finally arrives. It’s the same sort of complex multi-drone swarm capability that the Pentagon is seeking to develop. Ukrainian Air Force Capt. Max Maslii, deputy chief of staff for the 96th Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade, described that goal as a departure from the way Russia operates “autonomous” drones like the Lancet, as isolated flying bombs. Under the “new paradigm,” Maslii told Defense One, the drones would be able to “find the … more efficient way to accomplish this mission, together with such machines.” At that point, he said, operators wouldn’t be stuck piloting one drone at a time. They would work more like technicians managing a larger, more complex system. “Our job will be … to produce a lot of drones, to put them in the proper place, to take care [of] the systems that manage those drones, and just to, you know, turn them on.” NEXT STORY: Put nuclear reactors in space within a few years, White House tells Pentagon Help us tailor content specifically for you: Thank you for subscribing! Please check out our other newsletter offerings on our Newsletter page.

All Headlines North Korea Sports Top News Most Viewed Korean Newspaper Headlines Today in Korean History Yonhap News Summary Editorials from Korean Dailies URL is copied. SEOUL, March 23 (Yonhap) -- HD Hyundai Co. said Monday its key affiliates and a U.S. robotics firm have forged a partnership to develop and commercialize artificial intelligence (AI)-powered humanoid welding robots for shipyard projects. The partnership agreement was signed recently between HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering (KSOE) Co. and HD Hyundai Robotics Co., along with Persona AI, a Houston-based company specializing in humanoid robots, according to the South Korean shipbuilder. It is a follow-up to a memorandum of understanding signed in May of last year on developing humanoid robots for shipyard welding. HD Hyundai noted that a prototype under development since last year has demonstrated sufficient technological feasibility and potential. Under the agreement, HD KSOE will develop welding training technologies for robots using data accumulated at shipyards, while HD Hyundai Robotics will oversee system integration for robot deployments. Persona AI plans to develop a bipedal humanoid platform capable of stable movement in shipyard environments. HD Hyundai said it plans to gradually deploy shipyard-specific humanoid welding robots at actual shipbuilding sites capable of performing complex tasks. This photo provided by HD Hyundai Co. on March 23, 2026, shows (from L to R) Song Young-hoon, head of the solutions development division at HD Hyundai Robotics Co., Lee Dong-joo, head of the manufacturing innovation institute at HD KSOE Co., and Persona AI Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Nick Radford posing for a commemorative photo at HD Hyundai Co.'s global research and development center in Pangyo, south of Seoul, after the companies signed a partnership agreement to develop AI-powered humanoid welding robots. (PHOTO NOT FOR SALE) (Yonhap) odissy@yna.co.kr(END) All News National North Korea Economy/Finance Biz Culture/K-pop Sports Images Videos Top News Most Viewed Korean Newspaper Headlines Today in Korean History Yonhap News Summary Editorials from Korean Dailies Korea in Brief Useful Links Weather Advertise with Yonhap News Agency

A McDonald’s in the Chinese megacity of Shanghai is testing humanoid robots in roles usually the preserve of human workers, with other types of robots also let loose inside the restaurant to greet and entertain diners. Truth be told, the robots don’t look particularly advanced, but a video (below) showing them in action does hint at a future where bipedal bots and other machines handle routine tasks at fast food restaurants, from welcoming customers and taking orders to delivering food and cleaning the floor. A McDonald’s in Shanghai has begun deploying humanoid robots (from KEENON Robotics) to serve customers.> These humanoid robots provide information, greet guests, and help enliven the atmosphere.> Food delivery robots serve meals to customers and collect used trays.in the… pic.twitter.com/IEFzucz3IE The McDonald’s trial, using robots supplied by Chinese firm Keenon Robotics, comes at a time of economic contradiction in China, where businesses in some sectors are struggling to hire even as millions of young people face difficulty finding work. It’s this tension that makes the McDonald’s trial stand out, with restaurant operators interested in deploying a reliable, potentially low-cost workforce in a strategy that raises fears of displacement among human workers in the service sector, which up to now has been a popular route into the workforce. The reality, however, is more complicated. China’s workforce is shrinking as the population ages, while many younger job seekers are reluctant to take on low-paid, repetitive work. In that case, robot technology could be used to fill gaps rather than simply replace people. Still, the presence of robots in such a visible, everyday setting highlights how quickly that balance could shift. While it could be a while before McDonald’s deploys humanoid robots in a more meaningful way, adding them to restaurants as greeters and entertainers could potentially draw curious diners, especially families with kids who might want to interact with the machines while waiting for their meal to arrive. Even if the fast food giant eventually wants robots to run its restaurants, such a scenario is almost certainly many years away, simply because the technology isn’t yet up to it. What feels more likely, at least in the short term, is a hybrid setup where human workers handle the majority of tasks while the robots take on more basic, customer-facing roles out front. Subtlety is overrated, and MSI just proved that. The Taiwanese laptop maker has rolled out a sweeping refresh, unveiling more than a dozen new gaming laptops spread across its Cyborg, Crosshair, Raider, Stealth, and Titan lineups. The models cover 15-inch, 16-inch, and 18-inch form factors, ensuring there’s something for every gamer or professional user, making it hard for buyers to run out of excuses for not upgrading this year. Google made an unexpected cameo on Macs with the launch of a native Gemini app. What’s even more interesting (and a bit funny) is that the app arrived at Apple’s long-promised Siri upgrade (and a rumored standalone app for the voice assistant). The free app is available on macOS 15 and above. Though the app isn’t available on the App Store (yet), you can download it from Google’s official landing page. Nothing launched a genuinely useful app called Warp earlier today, with a simple idea: allowing Android users to share files, links, and copied texts directly to their Mac, Windows, or Linux machines without including any cables or convoluted workarounds. Nothing announced the app for Chrome and Edge (Chromium-based web browsers) and Android smartphones, floating it on both the Chrome Web Store and the Google Play Store (via 9To5Google). However, a few hours later, the app is nowhere to be found, with the official listings returning errors. Upgrade your lifestyleDigital Trends helps readers keep tabs on the fast-paced world of tech with all the latest news, fun product reviews, insightful editorials, and one-of-a-kind sneak peeks.

SEOUL, March 23 (UPI) -- South Korea's HD Hyundai said Monday it would test welding humanoid robots at shipyards operated by its affiliates, including the world's leading shipbuilder HD Hyundai Heavy Industries. HD Hyundai noted that its subsidiaries have recently signed an agreement with U.S.-based artificial intelligence company Persona AI, a high-profile startup on industrial humanoid robots. Under the partnership, HD Hyundai will leverage its shipyard data to come up with robot training technologies for field testing. Meanwhile, Persona AI is poised to focus on developing a bipedal humanoid platform designed to stably move in complex shipyard environments, according to HD Hyundai. The Seoul-based conglomerate said that the project aims to test robots capable of performing high-level tasks such as welding by replicating the expertise and working patterns of highly skilled personnel. "Humanoids tailored for shipyards will serve as a key foundation for future smart facilities by enhancing worker safety while improving production efficiency," HD Hyundai said in a statement. "We plan to lead a new paradigm in the shipbuilding industry by introducing humanoids into ship construction sites." The group did not disclose a timeline for deploying the robots in actual operations. Such a move is expected to face strong opposition from labor unions. The share price of HD Hyundai dipped 9.23% on Monday on the Seoul bourse. The country's benchmark KOSPI dropped 6.49% amid rising tensions between Washington and Tehran. Read More Labor union rallies behind Korea Zinc before key shareholder battle Korea Aerospace Industries' new CEO takes office South Korea seeks to attract global visitors with 'K-Chicken Belt' Topics BusinessTechnology Latest Headlines World News // 21 minutes ago South Korea pet insurance market grows but uptake remains low April 15 (Asia Today) -- S. Korea's pet insurance market has expanded more than threefold in the past three years, but low enrollment rates continue to limit its growth. World News // 26 minutes ago IAEA chief says North Korea expands uranium enrichment April 15 (Asia Today) -- Rafael Grossi said that North Korea has built a new uranium enrichment facility, signaling a significant expansion of its nuclear capabilities. World News // 33 minutes ago South Korea import prices post biggest jump in 28 years April 15 (Asia Today) -- S. Korea's import prices rose 16.1% in March from a month earlier, the sharpest monthly increase in more than 28 years, according to the Bank of Korea. World News // 45 minutes ago South Korea moves to stabilize farm supplies amid price risks April 15 (Asia Today) -- S. Korea has secured stable supplies of agricultural fertilizer through July and is expanding subsidies to offset rising costs farming materials. World News // 54 minutes ago South Korean charities push tax incentives for legacy giving April 15 (Asia Today) -- More than 200 charities in South Korea are urging lawmakers to adopt tax incentives for legacy donations to expand the country's culture of giving. World News // 1 hour ago North Korea avoids 'Day of the Sun' term in state media April 15 (Asia Today) -- N. Korea has avoided using the term "Day of the Sun" in state media coverage marking the birthday of Kim Il Sung, signaling a shift to current leader. World News // 1 hour ago South Korea pushes looser rules for high-tech sectors April 15 (Asia Today) -- Lee Jae-myung said South Korea should shift to a "negative regulation" system in advanced technology sectors to strengthen global competitiveness. World News // 12 hours ago Iran threatens shipping in Red Sea as Trump says talks likely to restart April 15 (UPI) -- As a U.S. blockade of Iranian ports continues, Iran threatened Wednesday to halt shipping in the Red Sea, the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. World News // 5 hours ago Milei's approval falls in Argentina as inflation picks up again BUENOS AIRES, April 15 (UPI) -- Public discontent with Argentine President Javier Milei is rising as inflation accelerates again and many people say they have yet to feel the benefits of the government's economic reforms. World News // 5 hours ago Separatists in Cameroon pause fighting for Pope Leo XIV visit April 15 (UPI) -- Pope Leo XIV landed in Cameroon Wednesday, and English-speaking separatists in the country announced a pause in fighting for "safe travel passage." SEOUL, March 23 (UPI) -- South Korea's HD Hyundai said Monday it would test welding humanoid robots at shipyards operated by its affiliates, including the world's leading shipbuilder HD Hyundai Heavy Industries. HD Hyundai noted that its subsidiaries have recently signed an agreement with U.S.-based artificial intelligence company Persona AI, a high-profile startup on industrial humanoid robots. Under the partnership, HD Hyundai will leverage its shipyard data to come up with robot training technologies for field testing. Meanwhile, Persona AI is poised to focus on developing a bipedal humanoid platform designed to stably move in complex shipyard environments, according to HD Hyundai. The Seoul-based conglomerate said that the project aims to test robots capable of performing high-level tasks such as welding by replicating the expertise and working patterns of highly skilled personnel. "Humanoids tailored for shipyards will serve as a key foundation for future smart facilities by enhancing worker safety while improving production efficiency," HD Hyundai said in a statement. "We plan to lead a new paradigm in the shipbuilding industry by introducing humanoids into ship construction sites." The group did not disclose a timeline for deploying the robots in actual operations. Such a move is expected to face strong opposition from labor unions. The share price of HD Hyundai dipped 9.23% on Monday on the Seoul bourse. The country's benchmark KOSPI dropped 6.49% amid rising tensions between Washington and Tehran.

SEOUL, March 23 (UPI) -- South Korea's HD Hyundai said Monday it would test welding humanoid robots at shipyards operated by its affiliates, including the world's leading shipbuilder HD Hyundai Heavy Industries. HD Hyundai noted that its subsidiaries have recently signed an agreement with U.S.-based artificial intelligence company Persona AI, a high-profile startup on industrial humanoid robots. Under the partnership, HD Hyundai will leverage its shipyard data to come up with robot training technologies for field testing. Meanwhile, Persona AI is poised to focus on developing a bipedal humanoid platform designed to stably move in complex shipyard environments, according to HD Hyundai. The Seoul-based conglomerate said that the project aims to test robots capable of performing high-level tasks such as welding by replicating the expertise and working patterns of highly skilled personnel. "Humanoids tailored for shipyards will serve as a key foundation for future smart facilities by enhancing worker safety while improving production efficiency," HD Hyundai said in a statement. "We plan to lead a new paradigm in the shipbuilding industry by introducing humanoids into ship construction sites." The group did not disclose a timeline for deploying the robots in actual operations. Such a move is expected to face strong opposition from labor unions. The share price of HD Hyundai dipped 9.23% on Monday on the Seoul bourse. The country's benchmark KOSPI dropped 6.49% amid rising tensions between Washington and Tehran. Read More Labor union rallies behind Korea Zinc before key shareholder battle Korea Aerospace Industries' new CEO takes office South Korea seeks to attract global visitors with 'K-Chicken Belt' Topics BusinessTechnology Latest Headlines World News // 21 minutes ago South Korea pet insurance market grows but uptake remains low April 15 (Asia Today) -- S. Korea's pet insurance market has expanded more than threefold in the past three years, but low enrollment rates continue to limit its growth. World News // 26 minutes ago IAEA chief says North Korea expands uranium enrichment April 15 (Asia Today) -- Rafael Grossi said that North Korea has built a new uranium enrichment facility, signaling a significant expansion of its nuclear capabilities. World News // 33 minutes ago South Korea import prices post biggest jump in 28 years April 15 (Asia Today) -- S. Korea's import prices rose 16.1% in March from a month earlier, the sharpest monthly increase in more than 28 years, according to the Bank of Korea. World News // 45 minutes ago South Korea moves to stabilize farm supplies amid price risks April 15 (Asia Today) -- S. Korea has secured stable supplies of agricultural fertilizer through July and is expanding subsidies to offset rising costs farming materials. World News // 54 minutes ago South Korean charities push tax incentives for legacy giving April 15 (Asia Today) -- More than 200 charities in South Korea are urging lawmakers to adopt tax incentives for legacy donations to expand the country's culture of giving. World News // 1 hour ago North Korea avoids 'Day of the Sun' term in state media April 15 (Asia Today) -- N. Korea has avoided using the term "Day of the Sun" in state media coverage marking the birthday of Kim Il Sung, signaling a shift to current leader. World News // 1 hour ago South Korea pushes looser rules for high-tech sectors April 15 (Asia Today) -- Lee Jae-myung said South Korea should shift to a "negative regulation" system in advanced technology sectors to strengthen global competitiveness. World News // 12 hours ago Iran threatens shipping in Red Sea as Trump says talks likely to restart April 15 (UPI) -- As a U.S. blockade of Iranian ports continues, Iran threatened Wednesday to halt shipping in the Red Sea, the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. World News // 5 hours ago Milei's approval falls in Argentina as inflation picks up again BUENOS AIRES, April 15 (UPI) -- Public discontent with Argentine President Javier Milei is rising as inflation accelerates again and many people say they have yet to feel the benefits of the government's economic reforms. World News // 5 hours ago Separatists in Cameroon pause fighting for Pope Leo XIV visit April 15 (UPI) -- Pope Leo XIV landed in Cameroon Wednesday, and English-speaking separatists in the country announced a pause in fighting for "safe travel passage." SEOUL, March 23 (UPI) -- South Korea's HD Hyundai said Monday it would test welding humanoid robots at shipyards operated by its affiliates, including the world's leading shipbuilder HD Hyundai Heavy Industries. HD Hyundai noted that its subsidiaries have recently signed an agreement with U.S.-based artificial intelligence company Persona AI, a high-profile startup on industrial humanoid robots. Under the partnership, HD Hyundai will leverage its shipyard data to come up with robot training technologies for field testing. Meanwhile, Persona AI is poised to focus on developing a bipedal humanoid platform designed to stably move in complex shipyard environments, according to HD Hyundai. The Seoul-based conglomerate said that the project aims to test robots capable of performing high-level tasks such as welding by replicating the expertise and working patterns of highly skilled personnel. "Humanoids tailored for shipyards will serve as a key foundation for future smart facilities by enhancing worker safety while improving production efficiency," HD Hyundai said in a statement. "We plan to lead a new paradigm in the shipbuilding industry by introducing humanoids into ship construction sites." The group did not disclose a timeline for deploying the robots in actual operations. Such a move is expected to face strong opposition from labor unions. The share price of HD Hyundai dipped 9.23% on Monday on the Seoul bourse. The country's benchmark KOSPI dropped 6.49% amid rising tensions between Washington and Tehran.

An editorially independent publication supported by the Simons Foundation. Get the latest news delivered to your inbox. Create a reading list by clicking the Read Later icon next to the articles you wish to save. Type search term(s) and press enter Popular Searches March 13, 2026 Companies are developing and now promoting a future full of humanoid robots. Henry Flores for Quanta Magazine Contributing Writer March 13, 2026 The last time I covered the science of humanoid robots, the state of the art looked downright Orwellian — by which I mean, “four legs good, two legs bad.” It was 2015. Boston Dynamics’ first “Spot” quadruped had taken YouTube by storm, confidently trotting up stairs and recovering from vicious kicks. Also popular at the time: humanoids falling down. Constantly. I felt sorrier for those tottering metal lobsters than I ever did for Spot. Bipedal locomotion is hard. Cut to now. Humanoids have apparently become so advanced that Tesla is mothballing some electric car models to make way for its Optimus humanoid robot, and start-ups are preselling android butlers with a straight face. Hype aside, I was genuinely curious: Did a paradigm shift happen in the field when I wasn’t looking? Sure, “AI” happened (that is, in the post-ChatGPT sense). I certainly hadn’t overlooked that. But I had no idea what it possibly had to do with robots not falling down anymore. AI breakthroughs have made humanoid robots more capable than ever. But they still struggle with everyday tasks like stairs and doors. For a reality check, I called Scott Kuindersma, who recently left Boston Dynamics after many years there, and Jonathan Hurst of Agility Robotics. Both scientists had been present and involved during the robot-faceplant days. Surely today’s robotic bipedal marvels can ascend a few stairs and open a door without breaking a nonexistent sweat, something they famously struggled with a decade ago. I asked each researcher: Can your flagship robot — Boston Dynamics’ Atlas or Agility’s Digit, two of the most credible and pedigreed humanoids on Earth — handle any set of stairs or doorway? “Not reliably,” Hurst said. “I don’t think it’s totally solved,” Kuindersma said. Don’t get me wrong: I don’t believe that some sock-faced robot zombie is close to taking over my household chores. But stairs and doors? It’s 2026. Why are humanoids still this … hard? To be fair, a paradigm shift did happen. Three, actually. First, deep learning — neural networks running on fast GPU chips — turbocharged computer vision and reinforcement learning, which radically improved the speed and sophistication with which robots could perceive and interact with their environments. Then in 2016, a revolution in actuation (roboticist-speak for “making parts move”) began: Heavy hydraulic mechanisms were replaced by smaller, “proprioceptive” electric motors that gave legged robots animal-like nimbleness. Most recently came the large language models. Adapting chatbot technology for robots, it turns out, lets them autonomously plan and perform multistep tasks, such as coring an apple or emptying a dishwasher (in demos, at least). In philosophy, “qualia” refers to the subjective qualities of our experience: what it’s like for Alice to see blue or for Bob to feel delighted. Qualia are “the ways things seem to us,” as the late philosopher Daniel Dennett put it. In these essays, our columnists follow their curiosity, and explore important but not necessarily answerable scientific questions. These advances created the night-and-day difference between “Running Man,” the hulking, halting version of Atlas that won second place in 2015’s DARPA Robotics Challenge, and the svelte, smooth Atlas recently shown breakdancing and autonomously moving irregular items from one bin to another (while dealing with interference from a hockey stick–wielding human). That fluid gait, for example, comes from deep reinforcement learning. Roboticists once coordinated each movement with various hand-engineered algorithms, using equations to model the (simplified) physics of the robot. Now they train neural networks to act as “whole-body controllers” by running countless digital simulations of the humanoid. This process teaches the network a “policy” for how to translate feedback from its environment into actions. “We use reinforcement learning to build a policy that’s handling the body coordination, collision avoidance, balance, all that stuff,” Kuindersma said. There’s no longer any need to model a robot’s leg as a linear inverted pendulum, for example. “That’s just gone by the wayside,” he said. Get Quanta Magazine delivered to your inbox The Atlas robot from Boston Dynamics shows off in a video from early 2025. Boston Dynamics/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images This strategy was aided by the proprioceptive actuators pioneered by Sangbae Kim of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in his Cheetah series of robots. “Reinforcement learning has existed for a long time, you know. People tried it before,” Kim said. “But if you use conventional [motors], the robot just breaks” every time it fails to perfectly execute a policy in the real world — or encounters an obstacle or disturbance. Kim’s actuators got around the problem with controllable “compliance,” or flexible springiness. Over the past decade, they’ve gotten cheaper and more widely accessible. “Reinforcement learning solved a lot of the [bipedal] locomotion problem, but the hardware was the enabler,” Kim said. To have robots which work like humans, I think we have to master physics. Pulkit Agrawal If reinforcement learning and compliant actuation were gifts to humanoid robotics, multimodal AI put a bow on it. In 2023, Google DeepMind introduced “vision-language-action” (VLA) models, which can take in video and natural language and produce movement commands as outputs. “If you say ‘I’m thirsty,’ it knows you probably want to drink, and it can [generate] the steps that [the robot] needs to take: Go find a thing, and then pick it up in this way,” said Carolina Parada, head of robotics at Google DeepMind. “This is something that, before three years ago, you would have to go hard-code.” In a stroke, VLAs united previously disparate approaches to robotic perception, planning, and control into one general-purpose pipeline. Robust embodiment, check. Generalizable intelligence, check. (A start, anyway.) So why don’t they add up to humanoids being scientifically “solved” — at least in principle? Pulkit Agrawal, who studies robot learning at the appropriately named Improbable AI Lab at MIT, had an answer when I reached him there last month. “To have robots which work like humans,” he said, “I think we have to master physics.” He wasn’t referring to cosmic matters like general relativity or quantum gravity, nor to the virtual “world models” that currently excite leading AI researchers such as Yann LeCun. Instead, Agrawal is talking about mastering something a high school science student ought to be familiar with: force and inertia. Press images of the Neo from 1X (left) and Tesla’s Optimus (right) imagine a future of humanoid helpers. Courtesy of 1X; Tesla The whole point of the humanoid form factor, after all, is to deliver what Kim calls “multipurpose mobile manipulation,” or the ability to move almost anywhere (including on stairs and through doors) and handle almost anything (from unloading pallets to screwing in light bulbs), without hurting anyone in the process. In short, what we do every day. “These things are about [controlling] forces, if you want to do them at speeds of a human,” Agrawal said. “Force control has been a thing in classical [robotics]. But in modern machine learning land, it’s not been that widespread.” Force control is simple in principle. Picture a robot arm drawing on a whiteboard — without smashing the tip of the marker. Roboticists have known how to make this happen for more than 40 years: They program the arm to behave as if it has an imaginary spring and shock absorber attached to it. “One can make the spring really soft in the direction pointing into the whiteboard, and stiffer along the surface of the whiteboard,” Kuindersma said. “That way the robot maintains the right pressure with the marker while precisely writing the lines and curves of the letters.” This feedback can be driven by force sensors built into the robot’s joints, but the catch is that the classical approaches require a lot of knowledge about the robot, environment, and task in order to work, he further explained. That approach to controlling force works great for industrial robots with specific tasks to perform, and it even helped with humanoid locomotion. But it was impossible to generalize. Kim’s proprioceptive electric actuators, also called quasi-direct drive actuators, simplified things. Not only were they designed to absorb unexpected impacts without damage, they were also very “transparent,” which meant that the motor converted electrical current into a proportional amount of force (and vice versa) with relatively little error. In essence, the motor itself became a force sensor, which meant “you can remove cost and complexity from your robot by eliminating dedicated force sensors,” Kuindersma said. As reinforcement learning eclipsed manual programming as a way of controlling humanoid movement, “classic” force control was not forgotten. It just got abstracted and delegated, in a way, to both hardware and AI. “From an AI point of view, it’s not like you have to be thinking about force control,” Hurst said. “It’s more like you kind of know that you need a quasi-direct drive motor to get close [to the force regulation necessary], then put [the neural network] in simulation and iterate a million times — and then you can put it on the robot and get cool behaviors.” Those neural networks are learning generalized policies that control the positions of a robot’s body parts. Force regulation often happens only indirectly in simulation training, or sometimes as a side effect when learned from video or human input. But those methods don’t explicitly teach the physics of force — at least, not yet. “A lot of the signals that are required for doing intelligent force control are not present in [video and human demonstration] data,” Kuindersma said. DeepMind’s Parada acknowledged that the VLA models basically just learn to move between specifically defined poses — and this approach goes a long way. “We’ve been surprised ourselves at how far you can push it, without any other sensing,” she said. In 2015, the most advanced humanoid robots in the world competed at the DARPA Robotics Challenge Finals. The tech has since improved. DARPA But only so far. As long as robot bodies remain relatively stiff and heavy compared to ours, “they have high inertia, and they’re not [as] compliant,” Agrawal said, which means that without force control, they will struggle with precision tasks in complicated environments. “If you’re going to touch delicate objects and you have small errors, bad things are going to happen.” Picture a regular egg and another made of solid steel: One of them needs to be picked up much more carefully. One way to get around this problem, used by many impressive systems alongside positional accuracy, is just to go slow. Imagine trying to move a chair with your car, Agrawal said: “If I go slowly, I can be precise on how I move [my position], and then I can control where the chair goes, so the [force] problem goes away.” That’s part of why Atlas moves like molasses while grasping auto parts but glides like a gymnast when it’s not touching anything except the floor. “It would be an overstatement to say that force control is absolutely required in every useful manipulation task — that’s just not true,” Kuindersma said. But he, Hurst, and Parada all readily grant that clever force workarounds won’t deliver the all-purpose mobile dexterity our robot butlers need. Even if today’s VLA-brained bots, refined by reinforcement learning, had “an internet-sized” amount of positional data to train on, “it’s very likely you [would] have to do some additional work,” Parada said. “Humans feel the forces that are working against you when you’re trying to open a bottle.” Humanoids, for the most part, still don’t, which means they have not mastered physics — at least not in the way we have, from a lifetime of interacting with our environments through the extraordinarily complex musculoskeletal and nervous systems gifted to us by evolution. That’s a big reason why even doors and stairs aren’t fully “solved” for present-day humanoids. These stairs, that door? Probably. But all stairs and doors, plus everything else? “There’s no world in which there are actually useful, autonomous [humanoid] robots that are only doing position-based control,” Kuindersma said. “Force as a first-class citizen is absolutely required.” So how do we get over the wall, scientifically speaking? Most of the experts I asked suspect that it will take a new blend of hardware and software advances. Tactile sensors for better data collection and robot hands that combine high power, compliance, and transparency with low inertia would accomplish a lot, and nobody believes that true material breakthroughs (like replacing motors with artificial muscles) will be necessary. “The hardware is exceptional, and if you’re blaming [it], you’re making excuses,” said Russ Tedrake, another longtime MIT roboticist I spoke to. “If you put a human brain through the hardware we have today — by teleoperating it, for instance — it’s incredibly capable.” Finding more intelligent ways to control it is key. The Digit robot from Agility Robotics demonstrates fine motor control in an unstructured environment. Agility Robotics When asked how to achieve that, everyone had a different answer. Agrawal is studying how to combine force control with reinforcement learning by having humanoids learn compliant behaviors in simulation, instead of moving between rigidly defined positions. Tedrake, whose work on “large behavior models” (a cousin of VLAs) produced the apple-coring robot demo, recently argued in Science Robotics for a ChatGPT-style regime of “large-scale data collection and large pretrained models.” Frank Park, who wrote the book on modern robotics — literally, the textbook titled Modern Robotics — believes that current AI approaches should be torn down to the studs and replaced with ones that make physics fundamentals (such as force and acceleration) learnable at a foundational level. “The VLA architecture is just all wrong,” he told me. “I believe that approach is doomed to fail.” In all these conversations, what struck me most wasn’t the debates about which kinds of sensors, data, or AI architecture could “solve” humanoid robotics. Rather, it was the sense that the scientific ethos of the field had changed. Hurst, who had just spun Agility Robotics out of his Oregon State University lab when we first spoke, put a fine point on it. “I remember Gill Pratt, who was the director of the MIT Leg Lab and then the program manager for the DARPA Robotics Challenge, saying that his big worry was that we’d end up using reinforcement learning and AI to make robots walk and run before we ever actually understood how it works,” he said. “And in a lot of ways, we’re kind of doing that.” (Editor’s note: Gill Pratt recalled this conversation differently. He acknowledged that machine learning could allow performance beyond our formal understanding, but not that this was a cause for worry.) Tedrake agreed but said that it’s hardly the first time we’ve taken scientific and engineering leaps without a firm grip on the fundamentals. “If you look at electricity and magnetism, there was the Volta stage where you’re sticking electrodes in frogs,” he said. “And then we had Faraday, who did exactly the right experiments, and then eventually we had Maxwell tell us the governing equations. I think we’re in the Volta stage.” So when will humanoids be solved? “Robots are still bad, and it will take time. But the bones are good. Both are true,” Tedrake said. “And it’s still hard.” Contributing Writer March 13, 2026 Get Quanta Magazine delivered to your inbox Get highlights of the most important news delivered to your email inbox Quanta Magazine moderates comments to facilitate an informed, substantive, civil conversation. Abusive, profane, self-promotional, misleading, incoherent or off-topic comments will be rejected. Moderators are staffed during regular business hours (New York time) and can only accept comments written in English. Forgot your password ? We’ll email you instructions to reset your password Enter your new password

From daily news and career tips to monthly insights on AI, sustainability, software, and more—pick what matters and get it in your inbox. Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation all with fewer ads or a completely ad-free experience. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. Follow Us On Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation all with fewer ads or a completely ad-free experience. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. The partnership targets robots for welding, mobility and precision tasks, with phased rollout across shipyard operations. Hyundai has partnered with US-based robotics firm Persona AI to develop and commercialize humanoid welding humanoids for shipyards. A joint development agreement was signed by HD Hyundai with HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering, HD Hyundai Robotics, and Persona AI. Under the agreement, HD KSOE will develop welding training systems using shipyard data, while HD Hyundai Robotics will handle integration. Persona AI will design a bipedal humanoid platform, with phased deployment planned across shipbuilding sites. The deal builds on a May 2025 partnership after successful prototype evaluations, which aimed to develop humanoid robots capable of performing advanced welding tasks in shipyards. Growing labor shortages in heavy industry, particularly in high-risk tasks such as welding, are increasing the urgency for rugged, autonomous humanoid robots. Aiding such a transition, HD Hyundai announced a joint development agreement on March 23, and the signing ceremony took place at the HD Hyundai Global R&D Center in South Korea, marking a step forward in efforts to automate complex shipbuilding processes. An earlier agreement was set in May 2025, following which successful evaluations of a humanoid prototype’s technical feasibility and real-world applicability were conducted. Under the deal, HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering will develop artificial intelligence-based welding training systems using data collected from shipyard operations and integrate them into production workflows. HD Hyundai Robotics will oversee system integration, including quality analysis, control technologies, and field testing. Persona AI will focus on developing a bipedal humanoid platform capable of stable movement in challenging shipyard environments, reports The Korea Times. The collaboration aims to produce robots capable of performing high-skill tasks such as welding, mobility, perception, and precision control, with gradual deployment planned across shipyard operations. A prototype is targeted for completion by late 2026, followed by field testing and commercial deployment in 2027. The collaboration represents a significant step toward building smart shipyards where humans and robots operate side by side. Robotics player Persona sees the partnership with HD Hyundai and its affiliates as a significant step beyond a symbolic collaboration, noting that shipyards are among the largest real-world testing environments for deploying and validating durable humanoid robotic systems. Persona is positioning humanoid robots as a solution to skilled labor shortages in demanding industrial sectors. Its systems are designed for high-intensity environments and focus on “3D” tasks—dull, dirty, and dangerous—commonly found in shipyards, construction, and energy infrastructure, reducing the physical strain on human workers. The company highlights a technological foundation influenced by advanced robotics developed through NASA, combining this legacy with practical engineering aimed at real-world deployment. Central to its approach is a modular humanoid platform equipped with a highly dexterous robotic hand derived from NASA-linked intellectual property, enabling precise work in complex, unstructured settings. The platform uses interchangeable “Personas” that allow it to adapt across industries and tasks. In shipbuilding, the robots are designed for confined-space operations, hull welding and repair work, where workforce attrition in key trades can exceed 30 percent. In the energy sector, they support pipe welding, inspection, and maintenance as aging labor pools and automation reshape operations. The company aims to deliver scalable, reliable labor through continuous operation, improved efficiency, and reduced rework, advancing automation in heavy industry. Jijo is an automotive and business journalist based in India. Armed with a BA in History (Honors) from St. Stephen's College, Delhi University, and a PG diploma in Journalism from the Indian Institute of Mass Communication, Delhi, he has worked for news agencies, national newspapers, and automotive magazines. In his spare time, he likes to go off-roading, engage in political discourse, travel, and teach languages. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Premium Follow

Компания Google заключила партнёрское соглашение с немецкой компанией Agile Robots — поисковый гигант решил сделать ставку на робототехнику как ключевой инструмент развития по направлению искусственного интеллекта. Источник изображения: agile-robots.com Agile Robots специализируется на разработке интеллектуальных роботизированных манипуляторов и оснащённых сенсорами человекоподобных роботов. В рамках сотрудничества в оборудование немецкой компании будут интегрироваться ИИ-модели Google Gemini Robotics. «Партнёрство основывается на убеждении, что применение ИИ в физическом мире должно трансформироваться. Объединив оборудование Agile Robots и другие разрабатываемые в Германии решения в области робототехники с базовыми моделями Google DeepMind Gemini Robotics, обе стороны добьются успеха за счёт развёртывания роботов, сбора данных, обучения моделей и поэтапного совершенствования», — говорится в блоге компании. Google будет получать данные о работе своих продуктов в реальном мире — для технологического гиганта робототехника выступает одним из важнейших сценариев применения ИИ, где она конкурирует с Amazon и Tesla. У компании множество партнёрских соглашений по этому направлению. Мюнхенская Agile Robots к настоящему моменту развернула более 20 000 роботизированных систем по всему миру; решения Google она намеревается масштабно интегрировать в уже действующие системы. На начальном этапе это будут «высокоценные промышленные» сценарии, в том числе в производстве. Компания поможет Google и далее разрабатывать «более совершенные модели ИИ для роботов нового поколения». В прошлом году Google выпустила базовую и рассуждающую ИИ-модели Gemini Robotics и объявила о сотрудничестве с техасской Apptronik; в этом году стало известно, что подразделение Google DeepMind будет сотрудничать с Boston Dynamics в работе над роботом Atlas. Под управление Google была переведена входившая в холдинг Alphabet компания Intrinsic, которой прочат судьбу «Android в робототехнике»; в DeepMind также приняли на работу бывшего технического директора Boston Dynamics Аарона Сондерса (Aaron Saunders). Впрочем, некоторые сотрудники Google не вполне довольны сотрудничеством поискового гиганта с Boston Dynamics — у компании есть действующие контракты с Министерством обороны США. Источник: Укажите имя пользователя: и пароль: Войти © 1997—2026 Электронное периодическое издание "3ДНьюс" | Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ Эл ФС 77-22224 выдано Федеральной Службой по надзору за соблюдением законодательства в сфере массовых коммуникаций и охране культурного наследия При цитировании документа ссылка на сайт с указанием автора обязательна. Полное заимствование документа является нарушениемроссийского и международного законодательства и возможно только с согласия редакции 3DNews. Во время посещения сайта вы соглашаетесь с использованием нами файлов cookie, метрических программ, Пользовательским соглашением и даёте согласие на обработку и трансграничную передачу персональных данных.

From daily news and career tips to monthly insights on AI, sustainability, software, and more—pick what matters and get it in your inbox. Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation all with fewer ads or a completely ad-free experience. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. Follow Us On Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation all with fewer ads or a completely ad-free experience. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. OpenMind’s new robot app store allows humanoid and quadruped robots to expand their skills through apps. OpenMind, a robotics software company, has launched a new robot app store designed to let humanoid and quadruped robots gain new skills and abilities. The platform is live now and aims to eventually host thousands of apps that can expand the capabilities of robots beyond their built-in hardware. According to a Forbes report, the app store is built on OM1, OpenMind’s modular operating system, which allows developers to create apps that package specific skills for distribution across multiple robot platforms. OpenMind is working with partners including UBbtech, Agibot, Deep Robotics, Fourier, Booster, Dobot, LimX, and Magic Lab. “Computers and phones come with an operating system to provide the basics, but the real magic is the ability for everyone to personalize their phones and computers through apps and programs,” said Jan Liphardt, founder and CEO of OpenMind. “That’s how generic hardware comes to life and becomes your phone and your laptop. Your humanoid will be no different: thousands of apps, each representing skills from nursing and math education to cleaning and home safety, will give you almost unlimited choices.” Current apps cover a range of practical and experimental functions, from companionship, elder care, and home security to novelty apps like selfie-taking robots. The company expects the quality and complexity of apps to grow over time, similar to the early days of smartphone app stores. The platform emphasizes that software can evolve independently of hardware, enabling robots to learn new tasks and improve over time. Liphardt said, “Robots need a skill and cognition layer that evolves faster than hardware. The App Store is how robots become universal platforms whose skills can change over time to fit your needs.” OpenMind’s initial app catalog includes Omni-Guardian, which turns a robot into a companion and sentry capable of detecting intruders; Nova, which listens, sees, and moves to assist with daily tasks; WALL-E, which monitors digital assets and social feeds; Luckandroll OM1, enabling robots to interact with humans and coordinate with other robots; and Guardian, which can follow a user and take selfies. While some apps are experimental or low-effort, the approach mirrors the early days of iOS and Android app stores, where quirky and test apps dominated before the ecosystem matured. Liphardt notes that practical apps, such as floor cleaning or laundry assistance, will appear as robotics capabilities advance. The OpenMind developer ecosystem already includes over 1,000 developers worldwide and is open to additional developers and robot manufacturers. The company expects the store to expand rapidly as more apps and partners join, providing a growing library of skills for commercial and personal robots. By creating a software-focused platform, OpenMind is pushing the robotics industry toward modularity, flexibility, and user-driven innovation. This launch represents a significant step toward turning robots into universal, upgradable machines capable of performing diverse tasks in homes and workplaces. With over a decade-long career in journalism, Neetika Walter has worked with The Economic Times, ANI, and Hindustan Times, covering politics, business, technology, and the clean energy sector. Passionate about contemporary culture, books, poetry, and storytelling, she brings depth and insight to her writing. When she isn’t chasing stories, she’s likely lost in a book or enjoying the company of her dogs. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Premium Follow

Компания Google заключила партнёрское соглашение с немецкой компанией Agile Robots — поисковый гигант решил сделать ставку на робототехнику как ключевой инструмент развития по направлению искусственного интеллекта. Источник изображения: agile-robots.com Agile Robots специализируется на разработке интеллектуальных роботизированных манипуляторов и оснащённых сенсорами человекоподобных роботов. В рамках сотрудничества в оборудование немецкой компании будут интегрироваться ИИ-модели Google Gemini Robotics. «Партнёрство основывается на убеждении, что применение ИИ в физическом мире должно трансформироваться. Объединив оборудование Agile Robots и другие разрабатываемые в Германии решения в области робототехники с базовыми моделями Google DeepMind Gemini Robotics, обе стороны добьются успеха за счёт развёртывания роботов, сбора данных, обучения моделей и поэтапного совершенствования», — говорится в блоге компании. Google будет получать данные о работе своих продуктов в реальном мире — для технологического гиганта робототехника выступает одним из важнейших сценариев применения ИИ, где она конкурирует с Amazon и Tesla. У компании множество партнёрских соглашений по этому направлению. Мюнхенская Agile Robots к настоящему моменту развернула более 20 000 роботизированных систем по всему миру; решения Google она намеревается масштабно интегрировать в уже действующие системы. На начальном этапе это будут «высокоценные промышленные» сценарии, в том числе в производстве. Компания поможет Google и далее разрабатывать «более совершенные модели ИИ для роботов нового поколения». В прошлом году Google выпустила базовую и рассуждающую ИИ-модели Gemini Robotics и объявила о сотрудничестве с техасской Apptronik; в этом году стало известно, что подразделение Google DeepMind будет сотрудничать с Boston Dynamics в работе над роботом Atlas. Под управление Google была переведена входившая в холдинг Alphabet компания Intrinsic, которой прочат судьбу «Android в робототехнике»; в DeepMind также приняли на работу бывшего технического директора Boston Dynamics Аарона Сондерса (Aaron Saunders). Впрочем, некоторые сотрудники Google не вполне довольны сотрудничеством поискового гиганта с Boston Dynamics — у компании есть действующие контракты с Министерством обороны США. © 3DNews

Claire chatted to Kevin McAleer from kevsrobots about how to get started building robots at home. Kevin McAleer is a hobbyist robotics fanatic who likes to build robots, share videos about them on YouTube and teach people how to do the same. Kev has been building robots since 2019, when he got his first 3d printer and wanted to make more interesting builds. Kev has a degree in Computer Science, and because his day job is relatively hands-off, this hobby allows his creativity to have an outlet. Kev is a huge fan of Python and Micropython for embedded devices, and has a website – kevsrobots.com where you can learn more about how to get started in robotics.

People in Nigeria and India are strapping iPhones onto their heads and recording themselves doing chores. When Zeus, a medical student living in a hilltop city in central Nigeria, returns to his studio apartment from a long day at the hospital, he turns on his ring light, straps his iPhone to his forehead, and starts recording himself. He raises his hands in front of him like a sleepwalker and puts a sheet on his bed. He moves slowly and carefully to make sure his hands stay within the camera frame. Zeus is a data recorder for Micro1, a US company based in Palo Alto, California that collects real-world data to sell to robotics companies. As companies like Tesla, Figure AI, and Agility Robotics race to build humanoids—robots designed to resemble and move like humans in factories and homes—videos recorded by gig workers like Zeus are becoming the hottest new way to train them. Micro1 has hired thousands of contract workers in more than 50 countries, including India, Nigeria, and Argentina, where swathes of tech-savvy young people are looking for jobs. They’re mounting iPhones on their heads and recording themselves folding laundry, washing dishes, and cooking. The job pays well by local standards and is boosting local economies, but it raises thorny questions around privacy and informed consent. And the work can be challenging at times—and weird. Zeus found the job in November, when people started talking about it everywhere on LinkedIn and YouTube. “This would be a real nice opportunity to set a mark and give data that will be used to train robots in the future,” he thought. Zeus is paid $15 an hour, which is good income in Nigeria’s strained economy with high unemployment rates. But as a bright-eyed student dreaming of becoming a doctor, he finds ironing his clothes for hours every day boring. “I really [do] not like it so much,” he says. “I’m the kind of person that requires … a technical job that requires me to think.” Zeus, and all the workers interviewed by MIT Technology Review, asked to be referred to only by pseudonyms because they were not authorized to talk about their work. Humanoid robots are notoriously hard to build because manipulating physical objects is a difficult skill to master. But the rise of large language models underlying chatbots like ChatGPT has inspired a paradigm shift in robotics. Just as large language models learned to generate words by being trained on vast troves of text scraped from the internet, many researchers believe that humanoid robots can learn to interact with the world by being trained on massive amounts of movement data. Editor’s note: In a recent poll, MIT Technology Review readers selected humanoid robots as the 11th breakthrough for our 2026 list of 10 Breakthrough Technologies. Robotics requires far more complex data about the physical world, though, and that is much harder to find. Virtual simulations can train robots to perform acrobatics, but not how to grasp and move objects, because simulations struggle to model physics with perfect accuracy. For robots to work in factories and serve as housekeepers, real-world data, however time-consuming and expensive to collect, may be what we need. Investors are pouring money feverishly into solving this challenge, spending over $6 billion on humanoid robots in 2025. At-home data recording is becoming a booming gig economy around the world. Data companies like Scale AI and Encord are recruiting their own armies of data recorders, while DoorDash pays delivery drivers to film themselves doing chores. In China, workers in dozens of state-owned robot training centers wear virtual-reality headsets and exoskeletons to teach humanoid robots how to open a microwave and wipe down the table. “There is a lot of demand, and it’s increasing really fast,” says Ali Ansari, CEO of Micro1. He estimates that robotics companies are now spending more than $100 million each year to buy real-world data from his company and others like it. Workers at Micro1 are vetted by an AI agent named Zara that conducts interviews and reviews samples of chore videos. Every week, they submit videos of themselves doing chores around their homes, following a list of instructions about things like keeping their hands visible and moving at natural speed. The videos are reviewed by both AI and a human and are either accepted or rejected. They’re then annotated by AI and a team of hundreds of humans who label the actions in the footage. “There is a lot of demand, and it’s increasing really fast.” Because this approach to training robots is in its infancy, it’s not clear yet what makes good training data. Still, “you need to give lots and lots of variations for the robot to generalize well for basic navigation and manipulation of the world,” says Ansari. But many workers say that creating a variety of “chore content” in their tiny homes is a challenge. Zeus, a scrappy student living in a humble studio, struggles to record anything beyond ironing his clothes every day. Arjun, a tutor in Delhi, India, takes an hour to make a 15-minute video because he spends so much time brainstorming new chores. “How much content [can be made] in the home? How much content?” he says. There’s also the sticky question of privacy. Micro1 asks workers not to show their faces to the camera or reveal personal information such as names, phone numbers, and birth dates. Then it uses AI and human reviewers to remove anything that slips through. But even without faces, the videos capture an intimate slice of workers’ lives: the interiors of their homes, their possessions, their routines. And understanding what kind of personal information they might be recording while they’re busy doing chores on camera can be tricky. Reviews of such footage might not filter out sensitive information beyond the most obvious identifiers. For workers with families, keeping private life off camera is a constant negotiation. Arjun, a father of two daughters, has to wrangle his chaotic two-year-old out of frame. “Sometimes it’s very difficult to work because my daughter is small,” he says. Sasha, a banker turned data recorder in Nigeria, tiptoes around when she hangs her laundry outside in a shared residential compound so she won’t record her neighbors, who watch her in bewilderment. “It’s going to take longer than people think.” While the workers interviewed by MIT Technology Review understand that their data is being used to train robots, none of them know how exactly their data will be used, stored, and shared with third parties, including the robotics companies that Micro1 is selling the data to. For confidentiality reasons, says Ansari, Micro1 doesn’t name its clients or disclose to workers the specific nature of the projects they are contributing to. “It is important that if workers are engaging in this, that they are informed by the companies themselves of the intention … where this kind of technology might go and how that might affect them longer term,” says Yasmine Kotturi, a professor of human-centered computing at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. Occasionally, some workers say, they’ve seen other workers asking on the company Slack channel if the company could delete their data. Micro1 declined to comment on whether such data is deleted. “People are opting into doing this,” says Ansari. “They could stop the work at any time.” With thousands of workers doing their chores differently in different homes, some roboticists wonder if the data collected from them is reliable enough to train robots safely. “How we conduct our lives in our homes is not always right from a safety point of view,” says Aaron Prather, a roboticist at ASTM International. “If those folks are teaching those bad habits that could lead to an incident, then that’s not good data.” And the sheer volume of data being collected makes reviewing it for quality control challenging. But Ansari says the company rejects videos showing unsafe ways of performing a task, while clumsy movements can be useful to teach robots what not to do. Then there’s the question of how much of this data we need. Micro1 says it has tens of thousands of hours of footage, while Scale AI announced it had gathered more than 100,000 hours. “It’s going to take a long time to get there,” says Ken Goldberg, a roboticist at the University of California, Berkeley. Large language models were trained on text and images that would take a human 100,000 years to read, and humanoid robots may need even more data, because controlling robotic joints is even more complicated than generating text. “It’s going to take longer than people think,” he says. When Dattu, an engineering student living in a bustling tech hub in India, comes home after a full day of classes at his university, he skips dinner and dashes to his tiny balcony, cramped with potted plants and dumbbells. He straps his iPhone to his forehead and records himself folding the same set of clothes over and over again. His family stares at him quizzically. “It’s like some space technology for them,” he says. When he tells his friends about his job, “they just get astounded by the idea that they can get paid by recording chores.” Juggling his university studies with data recording, as well as other data annotation gigs, takes a toll on him. Still, “it feels like you’re doing something different than the whole world,” he says. An exclusive conversation with OpenAI’s chief scientist, Jakub Pachocki, about his firm's new grand challenge and the future of AI. Exclusive: Niantic's AI spinout is training a new world model using 30 billion images of urban landmarks crowdsourced from players. Axiom Math is giving away a powerful new AI tool. But it remains to be seen if it speeds up research as much as the company hopes. One-off tests don’t measure AI’s true impact. We’re better off shifting to more human-centered, context-specific methods. Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more. Thank you for submitting your email! It looks like something went wrong. We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive. © 2026 MIT Technology Review

In this article Google is adding another robotics partnership to its belt as it leans into robotics as a key bet for artificial intelligence. Agile Robots develops intelligent, sensor-based robotic arms and humanoid robots. The company announced a partnership with Google DeepMind to integrate its Gemini Robotics foundation models with Agile Robots’ hardware. "The partnership is built on a belief that applying AI in the physical world will be transformative," the Tuesday blog post states. "By bringing together Agile Robots' hardware and other AI robotic solutions developed in Germany, with Google DeepMind's Gemini Robotics foundation models, the two teams will improve performance via robot deployment, data collection, model training and iteration." The new partnership means Google will get real-world deployment data as it sees robotics as one of the large use cases for AI, competing against companies like Amazon and Tesla. It also shows the company is making several robotics partnerships as it leans into manufacturing as key use case. Munich-based Agile Robots already has more than 20,000 deployed robotic systems globally and it will integrate Google's tech in existing industrial robots at scale, the blog post says. The partnership will first focus on "high-value industrial" use cases such as manufacturing tasks. "This research partnership is an important step in bringing the impact of AI to the real world," said Carolina Parada, Senior Director and Head of Robotics, Google DeepMind, in Tuesday's blog post. She added that Agile Robots will help Google develop "more advanced AI models for the next generation of robots." In mid-2025, Google debuted two new AI models, Gemini Robotics and Gemini Robotics-ER (extended reasoning), bringing generative AI into physical action commands to control robots. Google said in a blog post at the time that it would partner with Apptronik, a Texas-based robotics developer, to "build the next generation of humanoid robots with Gemini 2.0." In January, Google's DeepMind said it would work with Hyundai's Boston Dynamics, formerly a division of Google, to develop new AI models for its Atlas robot. Last month, Google DeepMind announced that Intrinsic, a robotics software company, will be moved from the "Other Bets" category into the main company with hopes of being "The Android of robotics." The company said it will focus on the manufacturing industry and work with Google's Gemini and infrastructure teams, including potentially helping it with building out Google's own data centers. An early sign that the company was getting serious about robotics was in its hiring of key talent last year. In November, Google's DeepMind unit hired the former CTO of Boston Dynamics Aaron Saunders. However, Google's increased attention to robotics has also brought along internal skepticism. Boston Dynamics, for example, has long-standing contracts with the Defense Department, and some DeepMind employees reportedly brought up concern at an all-hands meeting earlier this year, according to Business Insider. It's not just a trend at Google. Robotics is surfacing as a key use case for AI across the tech industry. In February, Bedrock Robotics, an autonomous vehicle technology startup for construction machinery founded by veterans of Waymo and Segment, raised $270 million in a new fundraising round, valuing the two-year-old start-up at $1.75 billion. The round was led by Alphabet's investment arm CapitalG, Valor Atreides A.I. Fund; Nvidia's venture arm and previous backer 8VC. Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you. Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inbox Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. © 2026 Versant Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. A Versant Media Company. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by

The use of AI-powered robots in warfare is no longer just an idea; it is becoming a reality. Modern battlefields are now being used to test advanced machines designed to reduce human risk and improve efficiency. These developments show how quickly robotics and artificial intelligence are moving from labs into real-world situations. One of the most advanced examples is the Phantom MK-1 humanoid robot. It is designed to move like a human and operate in difficult terrains where traditional machines struggle. The robot stands around 175 cm tall, weighs about 80 kg, and can carry up to 20 kg. It uses cameras and sensors to understand its surroundings and can move at speeds of up to 6 km/h. These robots are not fully independent. They are being tested to study mobility, performance, and how AI behaves under pressure. Military robots today use a mix of AI and human control. This is called a “human-in-the-loop” system. AI helps with tasks like identifying objects, navigating terrain, and suggesting actions. However, humans still control critical decisions, especially when it comes to using weapons. Humanoid robots are only part of the story. Uncrewed Ground Vehicles (UGVs) are already widely used. In January 2026 alone, more than 7,000 missions were carried out using robots. These machines mainly handle logistics such as delivering supplies, evacuating injured soldiers, and scouting areas. Most robots are currently used for support tasks rather than direct combat. Despite rapid growth, there are still limitations. Robots face issues like limited battery life, high costs, and difficulty understanding complex situations. There are also concerns about hacking and misuse. Looking ahead, experts believe future warfare could involve large groups of connected robots working together across land, air, and sea. This shift is not just about warfare; it is a major step forward in robotics and AI. Machines are slowly moving from tools to active partners, shaping the future of technology. The Phantom MK-1 is built by a San Francisco-based startup called Foundation, founded by former military personnel and engineers focused on defense robotics. The company has already secured about $24 million in contracts with the US Army, Navy, and Air Force, making it an official defense partner. Beyond this robot, the global race for military robotics is accelerating; countries like the United States, China, Israel, and Russia are actively developing and deploying robotic systems. China has tested armed robot dogs in military drills, while the US has long used systems like PackBot and TALON in combat zones. Even countries like Estonia and Turkey are building advanced unmanned ground and aerial combat systems, showing that the future battlefield is rapidly becoming automated. Read More: (via)

From daily news and career tips to monthly insights on AI, sustainability, Aerospace, and more—pick what matters and get it in your inbox. Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation. Engineering-inspired textiles, mugs, hats, and thoughtful gifts We connect top engineering talent with the world's most innovative companies. We empower professionals with advanced engineering and tech education to grow careers. We recognize outstanding achievements in engineering, innovation, and technology. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. Follow Us On Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation. Engineering-inspired textiles, mugs, hats, and thoughtful gifts We connect top engineering talent with the world's most innovative companies We empower professionals with advanced engineering and tech education to grow careers. We recognize outstanding achievements in engineering, innovation, and technology. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. The robot will help researchers explore how intelligent systems can better understand and respond to the world around them. Durham University has introduced a new humanoid robot to support advanced research in artificial intelligence, robotics, and human-robot interaction, reflecting a growing trend of universities adopting humanoid platforms for real-world research and experimentation. The university announced this move via its official website on April 1. The robot, named Alan, is a Unitree G1 Edu humanoid that will be used by researchers and students as a shared research platform to explore how robots can operate alongside humans, perform complex tasks, and function autonomously in dynamic environments. The platform is designed specifically for education and research institutions, allowing universities to experiment with artificial intelligence and robotics software on a full humanoid system. Humanoid robots are particularly valuable in research because they are designed to operate in environments built for humans. This allows researchers to test robots in realistic settings, such as laboratories, offices, and public spaces, without specialized infrastructure. The Unitree G1 platform has been used in a variety of robotics research and demonstrations, showcasing capabilities such as autonomous walking, playing games, interacting with objects, and performing complex movement tasks. The Unitree G1 has 23 degrees of freedom and full-body mobility, enabling it to perform tasks that require balance, manipulation, and coordination. Alan will primarily serve as a shared research platform within Durham University’s Computer Science department, particularly supporting the work of the VIViD research group. Researchers plan to use the humanoid robot to study how robots can recognize people and objects, understand complex scenes, imitate human actions, and make decisions in everyday environments. The platform will enable researchers to explore how intelligent robotic systems perceive and interact with their environments. The robot may also support research in assistive robotics, an area focused on developing robots that can work safely and usefully alongside people in real-world settings. This includes exploring how robots could assist humans in daily activities while operating safely in shared environments. In addition to these areas, the Unitree G1 will contribute to broader research projects across the department. Research involving humanoid robots has expanded rapidly in recent years, with platforms like the Unitree G1 used in experiments spanning sports and motion learning to industrial automation and autonomous navigation. One of the next research areas is exploring how the robot can perform simple tasks and make real-time decisions without relying heavily on external computing support. This activity would allow the humanoid robot to operate more independently and function more effectively in real-world environments. As a physical research platform, the robot enables researchers to test ideas in a practical, controlled way rather than solely through simulations or software models. The Unitree G1 will also support the department’s ongoing work in artificial intelligence, robotics, and visual computing, while providing opportunities for collaboration across research groups and projects. Atharva is a full-time content writer with a post-graduate degree in media & amp; entertainment and a graduate degree in electronics & telecommunications. He has written in the sports and technology domains respectively. In his leisure time, Atharva loves learning about digital marketing and watching soccer matches. His main goal behind joining Interesting Engineering is to learn more about how the recent technological advancements are helping human beings on both societal and individual levels in their daily lives. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Premium Follow

Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) is now commonly used for controlling legged robots. Several recent studies have demonstrated impressive results in solving increasingly complex robotic tasks such as navigation in unstructured environments or loco-manipulation. However, this complexity often comes with intricate learning setups requiring tedious reward shaping and features to help convergence. In this work, we tackle these issues and achieve loco-manipulation with a humanoid robot using a RL algorithm that enforces constraints through stochastic terminations during policy learning. We keep the number of rewards low by reformulating them as constraints when they can be intuitively expressed that way. Moreover, we study the relevance of various learning features encountered in the literature and show that providing observations without noise or privileged information to the critic are two straightforward ways to boost locomotion performances on rough terrains. We also demonstrate that the proposed minimalist architecture is not limited to pure locomotion but extends to a loco-manipulation task involving upper limbs. Videos are available at humanoid-cat.github.io. Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur https://hal.science/hal-05553678 Soumis le : lundi 16 mars 2026-08:47:28 Dernière modification le : mardi 17 mars 2026-03:18:45 Contact Ressources Informations Questions juridiques Portails CCSD

Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News AI can help develop methods of locomotion that are unconventional but fast AI can help develop methods of locomotion that are unconventional but fast Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by James Vincent Quadrupedal robots are becoming a familiar sight, but engineers are still working out the full capabilities of these machines. Now, a group of researchers from MIT says one way to improve their functionality might be to use AI to help teach the bots how to walk and run. Usually, when engineers are creating the software that controls the movement of legged robots, they write a set of rules about how the machine should respond to certain inputs. So, if a robot’s sensors detect x amount of force on leg y, it will respond by powering up motor a to exert torque b, and so on. Coding these parameters is complicated and time-consuming, but it gives researchers precise and predictable control over the robots. AI uses trial and error to develop its own style of running An alternative approach is to use machine learning — specifically, a method known as reinforcement learning that functions through trial and error. This works by giving your AI model a goal known as a “reward function” (e.g., move as fast as you can) and then letting it loose to work out how to achieve that outcome from scratch. This takes a long time, but it helps if you let the AI experiment in a virtual environment where you can speed up time. It’s why reinforcement learning, or RL, is a popular way to develop AI that plays video games. This is the technique that MIT’s engineers used, creating new software (known as a “controller”) for the university’s research quadruped, Mini Cheetah. Using reinforcement learning, they were able to achieve a new top-speed for the robot of 3.9m/s, or roughly 8.7mph. You can watch what that looks like in the video below: As you can see, Mini Cheetah’s new running gait is a little ungainly. In fact, it looks like a puppy scrabbling to accelerate on a wooden floor. But, according to MIT PhD student Gabriel Margolis (a co-author of the research along with postdoc fellow Ge Yang), this is because the AI isn’t optimizing for anything but speed. “RL finds one way to run fast, but given an underspecified reward function, it has no reason to prefer a gait that is ‘natural-looking’ or preferred by humans,” Margolis tells The Verge over email. He says the model could certainly be instructed to develop a more flowing form of locomotion, but the whole point of the endeavor is to optimize for speed alone. “Programming how a robot should act in every possible situation is simply very hard” Margolis and Yang say a big advantage of developing controller software using AI is that it’s less time-consuming than messing about with all the physics. “Programming how a robot should act in every possible situation is simply very hard. The process is tedious because if a robot were to fail on a particular terrain, a human engineer would need to identify the cause of failure and manually adapt the robot controller,” they say. By using a simulator, engineers can place the robot in any number of virtual environments — from solid pavement to slippery rubble — and let it work things out for itself. Indeed, the MIT group says its simulator was able to speed through 100 days’ worth of staggering, walking, and running in just three hours of real time. Some companies that develop legged robots are already using these sorts of methods to design new controllers. Others, though, like Boston Dynamics, apparently rely on more traditional approaches. (This makes sense given the company’s interest in developing very specific movements — like the jumps, vaults, and flips seen in its choreographed videos.) There are also faster-legged robots out there. Boston Dynamics’ Cheetah bot currently holds the record for a quadruped, reaching speeds of 28.3 mph — faster than Usain Bolt. However, not only is Cheetah a much bigger and more powerful machine than MIT’s Mini Cheetah, but it achieved its record running on a treadmill and mounted to a lever for stability. Without these advantages, maybe AI would give the machine a run for its money. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by James Vincent Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Robot Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Science Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech A free daily digest of the news that matters most. This is the title for the native ad This is the title for the native ad © 2026 Vox Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved

If you want to work with robots you can do all sorts of learning with software and simulation, but nothing quite beats getting to grips with real machinery. That was the motivation for [James Gullberg] to build this impressive robot arm. Featuring six degrees of freedom, the robot arm is mostly constructed of 3D printed components. This let [James] experiment with a wide variety of joint and reducer designs for the sake of learning and investigation. The base of the robot uses a fairly conventional planetary gear drive, while shoulder and elbow joints rely on split-ring planetary gearboxes to allow for high torque density with regards to size. [James] implemented a neat sensing technique here, integrating alternating magnets into the output ring gear which are monitored via a magnetic encoder. The wrist joint switches things up again, running via an inverted belt differential. Running the show is an STM32 microcontroller, which talks to all the encoders, communicates with a Raspberry Pi over CAN bus, and handles all the necessary PID control loops and step generation for the drive motors. The plan is to run higher-level control on the Raspberry Pi which will run a ROS 2-based software stack. Already, the various joints look smooth and impressive in motion. If you’re looking to learn about robot arms, you really can’t beat building one. We’ve featured a few projects along these lines before. Most of them aren’t exactly production-line ready, but they will teach you a ton about control, motion planning, and all sorts of associated skills. That experience can be invaluable if you intend to work with robots in industry. My (mostly) 3D printed Robot Arm byu/SPACE-DRAGON772 inEngineeringPorn Thanks to [JohnU] for the tip! Wow! Looks great! I wonder what kind of load those gears can handle. Either way I want one. Maybe I could finally get a robot to do the dishes for me. I am quite curious about how this thing really moves. From the 3D printed gears, my first guess is that there will be quite a lot of backlash, and this seems to be “cleverly” hidden in the video by only showing short clips of moves at constant speed. And even then you can see a bit of jerkiness. I am also having some doubts about the carbon fiber tubes. On themselves such tubes are extremely stiff, but with such long and thing tubes, any movement or flex in the plastic part where they are mounted will be amplified greatly. One of the better tests for mechanical stability is to just take the end effector by the hand and see how much it moves when you pull and push it a bit. Or with quick start and stop motions. Backlash and flex are very common causes that reduces good looking robot arms to not much more then “demo’s”. Look like there is a timing belt, and a two stage planetary gear in the shoulder joint and a total gear ratio of around 1:30 and that is a good compromise between force, speed and resolution. Another aspect I like are the arc of magnets. These are almost certainly part of an angle measurement system, and when done properly this can have a quite decent resolution. Use of ball bearings is also nice. I also like the use of standard nuts in a lot of parts. This is probably stronger then threaded inserts. In some places this could maybe still be improved upon a bit by using longer bolts and putting the nuts “on the other side” so the plastic is only used in compression. But overall, this design has quite a lot going for it. On his website he mentions that more info will follow soon. So I’ll save a link and come back later. Wondering how this compares to the Anin AR4 ? Was thinking of getting one. Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy) This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Multi-robot systems represent a key class of multi-agent systems where multiple autonomous agents cooperate to achieve tasks beyond the capabilities of a single robot. Their effectiveness relies on decentralized or distributed control, where collective behaviors emerge from local interactions under limited information and communication. Classical approaches have enabled significant progress in understanding coordination, information flow, and connectivity maintenance. However, these methods often depend on strong modeling assumptions and struggle to scale in dynamic, uncertain environments. Recent advances in machine learning provide promising alternatives by allowing agents to learn coordination strategies from data, enabling robustness and adaptability under partial observability and noisy sensing. Yet, existing learning-based frameworks rarely account for explicit communication, a critical factor in scalable multi-robot coordination that has been central to control-theoretic approaches. This dissertation addresses this gap by developing hybrid methods that integrate learning with communication-aware distributed control. By combining the generalization and flexibility of machine learning with the theoretical guarantees of control theory, this work advances the foundations of collective decision-making and contributes to the deployment of communication-aware, learning-based multi-robot systems in real-world applications. Les systèmes multi-robots constituent une classe centrale de systèmes multi-agents, où plusieurs robots coopèrent pour accomplir des tâches dépassant les capacités d’un seul agent. Leur efficacité repose sur des mécanismes décentralisés ou distribués, mais les approches classiques, bien qu’efficaces pour analyser la coordination et le maintien de la connectivité, peinent à s’adapter à des environnements dynamiques et incertains. L’apprentissage automatique offre une alternative prometteuse en permettant aux agents d’apprendre des stratégies de coordination robustes à partir de données, mais il intègre rarement la communication explicite, pourtant essentielle à l’évolutivité. Cette thèse propose des méthodes hybrides combinant apprentissage et contrôle distribué sensible à la communication, afin de concevoir des systèmes multi-robots plus adaptatifs, robustes et déployables dans des environnements réels. Contact https://theses.hal.science/tel-05549372 Soumis le : jeudi 12 mars 2026-15:02:05 Dernière modification le : jeudi 9 avril 2026-11:20:26 Contact Ressources Informations Questions juridiques Portails CCSD

Oops, something went wrong NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ:NXPI) is one of the 7 Cheapest AI Data Center Stocks to Buy Now. On March 17, 2026, NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ:NXPI) reported robotics solutions jointly with Nvidia, combining Nvidia Holoscan Sensor Bridge with NXP SoCs for sensor fusion, machine vision, and motor control. The corporation noted savings in component size, footprint, power, and cost savings while focusing on applications in humanoid robotics and physical AI systems. The corporation also outlined its efforts in edge processing, secure networking, and real-time control for robotics systems. NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ:NXPI) reported fourth-quarter revenue of $3.34 billion, up 7% year on year, and full-year revenue of $12.27 billion, a 3% decrease year on year. It posted non-GAAP diluted EPS of $3.35 in the fourth quarter and $11.81 in the full year, with $793 million in non-GAAP free cash flow in the quarter. It also bought back $338 million in shares and paid out $254 million in dividends during the quarter, with an additional $36 million in repurchases conducted after the quarter ended. A semiconductor. Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko on Pexels NXP Semiconductors N.V. (NASDAQ:NXPI) is a holding company that provides semiconductor solutions. It operates in the following areas: China, the Netherlands, the United States, Singapore, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, and other countries. While we acknowledge the potential of NXPI as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you’re looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 33 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and Cathie Wood 2026 Portfolio: 10 Best Stocks to Buy. Disclosure: None. Follow Insider Monkey on Google News. Sign in to access your portfolio

Unitree Robotics is set to launch its cheapest humanoid robot, the R1, in global markets next week. What makes this launch stand out is the sales strategy. Unitree is taking humanoid robots directly to online platforms, starting with AliExpress. This marks a shift from traditional enterprise sales to a more accessible, e-commerce-driven approach. The initial rollout will cover North America, Europe, Japan, and Singapore. The company is also joining Alibaba’s Brand+ channel, which brings benefits like free shipping, free returns, and better global visibility. More online and offline sales channels are expected to follow. The R1 was first launched in China in 2025 at a starting price of 29,900 yuan (around $4,370), making it one of the most affordable humanoid robots available. While global pricing is still unannounced, the company is expected to keep it competitive. Standing 123 cm tall and weighing over 27 kg, the R1 is designed for dynamic movement. It can perform cartwheels, run downhill, stand up from the ground, and execute complex routines. The “Born for sport” positioning highlights its focus on agility and motion rather than industrial tasks. Unitree’s move to sell robots online signals a major shift in how humanoid machines are marketed and distributed. Until now, most robots were sold through enterprise deals or research contracts. By listing on platforms like AliExpress, Unitree is opening access to developers, educators, and even early consumers globally. This builds on its existing customer base, where around 70% of shipments in 2025 went to universities and research institutions. The online model could further expand this ecosystem. The company shipped over 5,500 humanoid robots in 2025, far ahead of competitors like Tesla, Figure AI, and Agility Robotics, which delivered around 150 units each. Unitree now aims to ship 10,000 to 20,000 units in 2026. Its cost advantage comes from a highly localized supply chain, with over 80% of components sourced within China. This allows it to price robots far below global averages, where similar machines can cost up to $300,000. Unitree’s online-first global launch could reshape the humanoid robotics market. By combining low pricing with e-commerce accessibility, the company is testing real-world demand beyond labs and factories. If successful, this approach could accelerate adoption and bring humanoid robots closer to mainstream buyers much faster than expected. Read More:

UBTech’s salary range for Chief Scientist of Embodied Intelligence runs from $2.2M to $18M. The Shenzhen company’s humanoid robot revenue grew twenty-fold last year. Bloomberg calls the offer unusual even by Chinese standards. Chinese humanoid robotics company UBTech has posted a global recruitment notice for a Chief Scientist of Embodied Intelligence, offering an annual salary ranging from 15 million to 124 million yuan, equivalent to $2.2 million to $18 million. The role, which the company’s WeChat post describes as setting UBTech’s full technology roadmap and being ‘the helmsman of UBTECH’s technical path,’ was confirmed to China’s Global Times. Bloomberg described the package as unusual even by Chinese standards, noting that China’s AI industry has historically avoided the mega compensation packages commonplace in Silicon Valley. TNW City Coworking space - Where your best work happens A workspace designed for growth, collaboration, and endless networking opportunities in the heart of tech. UBTech was founded in 2012 and is headquartered in Shenzhen. It became the world’s first publicly listed humanoid robot maker, trading in Hong Kong. Its primary product is the Walker S2, a 5-foot-9 humanoid designed to operate autonomously in factories. Earlier this year, UBTech struck a deal with Airbus to test Walker S2 units on aircraft manufacturing production lines. In its annual results released on 31 March, the company reported 2025 revenue of 2.01 billion yuan, up 53.3% year-on-year. Revenue from humanoid products and services specifically reached 820.6 million yuan, representing 41% of total revenue, a twenty-fold increase from the previous year when that segment generated just 35.6 million yuan and accounted for less than 3% of revenue. The Chief Scientist role will lead research in vision-language-action models, robotics foundation models, and manipulation and dexterity capabilities, with the stated goal of accelerating large-scale deployment across manufacturing, commercial services, and what UBTech describes as ‘family companionship.’ The package is structured as a combination of cash, benefits, and equity. The job posting, which states UBTech does not care about passports, age, or gender, and asks only ‘Can you define the future?’, is part of a broader hiring push that also includes reinforcement learning algorithm engineers, hardware engineers, and EtherCAT master system developers. The offer lands at a moment when China’s humanoid robot industry is receiving explicit government support. Premier Li Qiang has included robotics in the government work report for two consecutive years, and Chinese companies accounted for nearly 90% of global humanoid robot shipments in 2025, according to research firm Omdia. UBTech sold 1,079 full-size humanoid robots last year, generating 820 million yuan. Tesla, meanwhile, posted a notice in late March seeking more than 80 specialists for its Optimus humanoid programme. The AI talent war that began in large language models is moving rapidly into embodied intelligence. I am the Editor in Chief for TNW, covering technology not as a parade of launches and valuations, but as a system of influence, persuasion, (show all) I am the Editor in Chief for TNW, covering technology not as a parade of launches and valuations, but as a system of influence, persuasion, and change. I write about startups, venture capital, digital policy, and Europe ecosystem, with an eye on the larger story beneath them: who gets to build the future, who profits from it, and how Europe is learning to speak in a louder voice of its own. Before moving into senior editorial leadership, I've built my career for over +10 years across journalism, storytelling, content strategy, SEO, and digital publishing, with experience in SaaS, hospitality, art, and culture. Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week. The heart of tech A Tekpon Company Copyright © 2006—2026, Cogneve, INC. Made with <3 in Amsterdam.

Den Delamarski is a Principal Product Engineer at Microsoft working in the Core AI division, focusing on AI tools for developers. Den is one of the core maintainers of the Model Context Protocol (MCP), having initially joined the project through his expertise in security and authorization. When MCP first launched with an auth specification, Den identified opportunities to improve it for enterprise scale and worked with the Anthropic team to rewrite the authorization framework, which was merged into the June 2024 version of the protocol. Beyond MCP, Den helps drive projects like GitHub SpecKit, which enables spec-driven development with agentic coding tools. His work centers on building developer tools and experiences in the rapidly evolving AI ecosystem, including projects like Copilot and other Microsoft AI initiatives. The Model Context Protocol solves a fundamental problem in AI systems: LLMs are trained on data that gets locked at a specific point in time, but users need to work with fresh, dynamic data. MCP provides a universal interface that allows any LLM or AI client to connect to data sources, applications, and services without custom integrations. Just as the Language Server Protocol (LSP) standardized how editors communicate with language tools, MCP standardizes how AI agents access external capabilities. The protocol is highly opinionated about authentication, message passing, and primitive exposure, eliminating the inconsistency found in traditional REST API integrations. The protocol went from non-existent to widely adopted in less than a year, with major companies across banking, healthcare, and gaming now integrating MCP into their AI strategies. The composability of MCP means you can connect multiple servers to a single client, allowing an LLM to coordinate across different data sources and services seamlessly. The Python SDK makes building MCP servers remarkably simple through the FastMCP framework, which provides a Flask-like developer experience. Creating an MCP tool is as straightforward as writing a Python function and adding a decorator. The SDK handles all the complex JSON-RPC envelope creation, streaming, and protocol compliance automatically. Developers can focus on business logic rather than protocol implementation details. FastMCP is integral to the official Python SDK and simplifies common pain points like authorization. The programming model supports async functions naturally, allowing you to await user input via elicitations without complex callback patterns. The framework also includes built-in support for structured output using Pydantic models, progress reporting, and image handling. MCP servers expose three fundamental primitives that LLMs can interact with. Tools are function calls that perform actions - think of them as API endpoints that do something like sending an email, querying a database, or creating a 3D scene in Blender. Prompts are reusable templates that help LLMs interact with your server effectively, such as "create a recipe with substitutions." Resources allow LLMs to reference and work with entities like databases, files, or API objects. Each primitive serves a distinct purpose in the agent workflow. Tools enable actions and side effects. Prompts guide the LLM on how to best use your server. Resources provide structured access to data and entities. Together, these primitives create a complete interaction model that's both powerful and constrained enough to be reliable. MCP servers can run in two distinct modes depending on your architecture needs. Local MCP servers use stdio (standard input/output) to communicate via native OS constructs between the MCP client and server processes. This is perfect for development machines where you want your editor or AI tool to access local capabilities without network overhead. Remote MCP servers use streamable HTTP and can be hosted anywhere - AWS, Azure, GCP, your home lab, or behind a reverse proxy like Nginx or Caddy. The transport layer is abstracted by the SDK, so the same server code can work in both modes with minimal changes. For local development with remote access, tools like Tailscale provide secure overlay networks without exposing ports or configuring complex VPN setups. This makes it trivial to run an MCP server on your home lab and access it securely from anywhere. The MCP Registry launched in September 2024 as a centralized API that indexes all publicly available MCP servers. Think of it like Docker Hub for MCP servers - you can discover servers, but you're not required to use the registry. The registry supports both public servers (like the GitHub-maintained registry) and private enterprise registries for internal company use. This allows organizations to maintain approved MCP servers behind security gates while still benefiting from the discoverability infrastructure. Discovery is improving rapidly with better integration into clients like VS Code, Cursor, and Claude Desktop. The Awesome MCP Servers list on GitHub has become a valuable community resource with hundreds of servers categorized by function - from biology and medicine to gaming, marketing, and sports analytics. Security and authorization was Den's entry point into MCP development. The June 2024 spec introduced formal OAuth 2.1-based authorization, eliminating the need for developers to implement custom auth flows or check API keys into source control. The brilliant part is that MCP server developers don't need to become OAuth experts - the SDKs handle it. For consumers, authentication is as simple as logging in when you connect a server. The client bootstraps the auth flow, stores tokens securely, and ensures you access only your data. MCP servers can specify whether they use API keys (stored in configuration) or OAuth (handled via standard browser-based login flows). This approach scales from hobby projects to enterprise deployments where data access controls are critical. The standardization means you don't face "17 different dances" to get authentication tokens from different services. GitHub SpecKit represents Microsoft's hypothesis for how spec-driven development works with AI coding tools. The approach starts with defining what and why you're building in a specification document, then breaks down the technical implementation plan, and finally decomposes it into consumable tasks that AI can execute iteratively or in parallel. This isn't the only way to do spec-driven development, but it provides a recipe book and ingredient box for teams wanting to adopt this workflow. The philosophy recognizes that there's no single correct approach to spec-driven development - it depends on your models, team structure, and project complexity. However, starting with a thorough planning phase using high-quality models, then executing with faster models guided by those specs, has proven effective for managing AI agent workflows on complex projects. The MCP ecosystem has exploded with creative and practical implementations. The Blender MCP server lets you describe a medieval scene with a dragon and lighting, and it builds it for you by translating high-level descriptions into Blender's native API calls. Gaming servers exist for Unity 3D, Minecraft, and even analyzing Halo stats. Marketing professionals can connect Facebook Ads, Google Ads, and Amazon Ads MCP servers to ask "how are my ads performing this week" across all platforms without clicking through dashboards. Sports enthusiasts can use Strava MCP for running and biking analytics, or the Formula 1 Multiviewer MCP that controls viewing angles and telemetry during live races. For developers, there are Jira and Atlassian MCP servers to automate bug triage and ticket management. The diversity shows MCP's flexibility - it's not just for data retrieval, but for controlling applications, analyzing information, and automating workflows across domains. Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and MCP serve different purposes in the AI architecture landscape. RAG builds vector databases to augment an LLM's context with additional knowledge, helping it understand what exists in a codebase or documentation set. It's primarily about giving the LLM more relevant context for making decisions. MCP, on the other hand, provides universal access to live data and actionable capabilities. It's not just about knowing what exists - it's about doing something with that information. While RAG helps an LLM understand that an authorization component exists in your codebase, MCP lets it actually invoke authentication services, update records, or chain multiple actions across services. The two technologies can complement each other: RAG for knowledge augmentation and MCP for capability extension. Many real-world AI applications benefit from using both - RAG for understanding context and MCP for taking action. There's ongoing debate about whether specialized local models or general-purpose cloud models work better for specific tasks. Den's perspective is that general-purpose models like Claude and GPT-4 will typically outperform local models for most scenarios due to superior training resources and compute power. However, local models excel for privacy-sensitive workloads - like organizing family photos without sending them to remote servers - or domain-specific tasks where a small, focused model can be as effective as a large general one. MCP enables an interesting hybrid approach: use powerful general-purpose models for orchestration and decision-making, but delegate specific subtasks to specialized local models or services via MCP servers. For example, a general model could coordinate a photo organizing workflow while a local computer vision model handles the actual image analysis. This composability allows building sophisticated systems that balance capability, privacy, cost, and latency. The Python MCP SDK prioritizes developer experience through familiar patterns and minimal boilerplate. The decorator-based approach (@mcp.tool) mirrors Flask and FastAPI, making it immediately intuitive for Python web developers. Async/await support is first-class, allowing natural progress reporting and elicitations without callback hell. The SDK includes 143+ contributors, ships releases every few days, and maintains "good first issue" tags for new contributors. Documentation and samples are comprehensive, with the official Python SDK repo containing multiple example servers. The team actively solicits feedback and iterates quickly on developer pain points. Installation is as simple as uv add mcp or pip install mcp, and you can have a working MCP server in under 10 lines of code. The combination of low barrier to entry and production-ready features makes MCP accessible to Python developers at all skill levels. While MCP provides secure authentication mechanisms, users must still exercise caution when installing third-party MCP servers. Like any software that accesses your data, you should verify the source and understand what an MCP server does before connecting it. An MCP server that reads your iMessages to "sort by importance" could potentially scan for credit card numbers or social security numbers. The responsibility for vetting servers lies with the user, just as it does with browser extensions or system-level applications. Best practices include reviewing source code for open-source MCP servers, starting with servers from trusted organizations, using private registries for enterprise deployments, and being cautious about granting broad permissions. Never check API keys into source control - use environment variables or OAuth flows instead. The MCP community is working on improved discovery with trust signals, but individual diligence remains essential for security. "Think about it like last year at this time, like at the time when we were recording the work item episode, MCP did not exist. Just not a thing. And now everybody's talking about MCP. Like you talk to any big companies, you talk to like the banks, the healthcare, the gaming, everybody, everybody cares about MCP." -- Den Delamarski "The way the folks at Anthropic have been describing it, it is USB-C for AI." -- Den Delamarski "Look at the simplicity of this. You literally have a Python function, you have def add, and there is your arguments, you would pass you a function, like two integers. And then all you need to do to make that a tool that an LM can invoke is just add that @mcp.tool decorator. That's it. You're not going and crafting elaborate JSON RPC envelopes and converters and all these things." -- Den Delamarski on the developer experience "I'll tell you what, the LLMs are getting really good at analyzing the stats. You give them the data, they can make some conclusions." -- Den Delamarski on his Halo stats MCP server "Do you remember the days when you had to work, this episode is not sponsored by Tailscale, for the record. Should be." -- Den Delamarski and Michael Kennedy discussing VPN complexity vs. Tailscale simplicity "The power is composability. It's the fact that you can compose things together and have them work together based on the prompts that you have and scenarios that you have." -- Den Delamarski "There's an MCP server for everything. Like, this list is massive. I'm actually like, every time I discover these things, I was like, oh, I didn't know there was one for multiviewer." -- Den Delamarski exploring the Awesome MCP Servers list "These are the life hacks you learned only from this podcast. Query all the bugs assigned to me, reassign them to somebody else." -- Den Delamarski joking about Jira MCP automation "Exercise caution, just like you would exercise with any other software and APIs and websites where you log in because the responsibility is kind of on you to figure out what's safe, what's not." -- Den Delamarski on MCP server security Model Context Protocol (MCP): An open protocol that provides a standardized way for AI applications to connect to data sources, services, and tools. It acts as a universal translation layer between LLMs and external systems, similar to how LSP standardized language tooling for editors. MCP Server: A service that implements the MCP specification and exposes tools, prompts, and resources that AI clients can use. Servers can run locally via stdio or remotely via HTTP. MCP Client: An application or editor that connects to MCP servers and makes their capabilities available to LLMs. Examples include VS Code, Cursor, Claude Desktop, and custom applications. Tools: Function calls that MCP servers expose to LLMs, allowing them to perform actions like querying databases, sending emails, or controlling applications. Prompts: Reusable templates that MCP servers provide to guide LLMs on how to interact effectively with their capabilities. Resources: References to databases, files, or API entities that MCP servers make available to LLMs for data access and manipulation. Elicitations: A mechanism for MCP servers to request structured input from users during tool execution, enabling confirmation dialogs, dropdown selections, and data validation. FastMCP: The primary framework within the Python SDK that provides a Flask-like decorator-based programming model for building MCP servers quickly. stdio Transport: A local communication method where MCP servers use standard input/output pipes to exchange JSON-RPC messages with clients on the same machine. Streamable HTTP Transport: A remote communication method where MCP servers expose HTTP endpoints for JSON-RPC message exchange, enabling cloud deployment and distributed architectures. JSON-RPC: The underlying message format used by MCP for communication between clients and servers, abstracted away by SDKs for developer convenience. MCP Registry: A centralized index of available MCP servers, similar to Docker Hub, that enables discovery and installation of servers into MCP clients. Supports both public and private registries. OAuth 2.1: The authentication and authorization standard used by MCP for secure access to protected resources, handled automatically by SDKs. RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation): A technique that builds vector databases to augment LLM context with additional knowledge, complementary to MCP's action-oriented approach. Spec-Driven Development: A development methodology where projects start with detailed specifications that guide AI coding tools through implementation, promoted by GitHub SpecKit. If you want to dive deeper into the topics covered in this episode, these courses from Talk Python Training can help you build the foundational skills and advanced techniques you'll need. LLM Building Blocks for Python: This concise 1.2-hour course teaches you to move beyond basic "text in, text out" with LLMs, covering structured data, chat workflows, async pipelines, and caching - essential skills for building MCP servers that integrate AI capabilities. Modern APIs with FastAPI and Python: Since FastMCP uses FastAPI-like patterns, this course provides deep knowledge of building modern Python APIs with type hints, async/await, and data validation - all of which directly apply to MCP server development. Async Techniques and Examples in Python: MCP servers heavily use async/await for streaming responses and progress reporting. This course covers Python's entire async ecosystem, from basic async/await to parallel processing and thread safety. Rock Solid Python with Python Typing: Type hints are fundamental to MCP servers and structured output with Pydantic. Learn how to use Python's typing system effectively, which powers frameworks like FastAPI and FastMCP. Build An Audio AI App: This course combines AI, FastAPI, and MongoDB to build real applications - a perfect companion for creating MCP servers that work with audio content, transcripts, and multimedia data. The Model Context Protocol represents a fundamental shift in how we build AI-powered applications. Rather than creating custom integrations for every data source and service, MCP provides a universal standard that works across LLMs, editors, and agentic tools. The Python ecosystem has embraced MCP with remarkable speed, delivering a developer experience that feels as natural as Flask or FastAPI while handling the complexity of JSON-RPC, streaming, and authentication behind the scenes. What makes MCP truly powerful is its composability. You can connect multiple servers to a single client, enabling LLMs to coordinate sophisticated workflows across different services. The registry ecosystem is exploding with servers for everything from 3D modeling in Blender to analyzing Formula 1 telemetry to automating Jira tickets. Yet beneath this diversity lies a consistent, well-designed protocol that makes both building and consuming MCP servers straightforward. For Python developers, now is the perfect time to explore MCP. The barriers to entry are low - you can have a working server in minutes. The community is active and welcoming, with good first issues available for contributors. The use cases span every domain imaginable, from enterprise data integration to creative hobby projects. Whether you're building the next generation of AI agents or simply want to give your AI tools access to your custom data, MCP provides the plumbing that just works. As Den put it, "MCP can do anything - it's just a pipe. What you do with that pipe is up to you." 00:00 On this episode, we're digging into the Model Context Protocol, or MCP. 00:04 Think LSP for AI. Build a small Python service once, and your tools and data show up across 00:11 editors and agents like VS Code, Claude Code, and more. My guest, Den Delamarski from Microsoft, 00:17 helps build this space and keeps us honest about what's solid versus what's just shiny. 00:23 We'll keep it practical, transports that actually work, guardrails you can trust, 00:27 and a tiny server you could ship this week. 00:29 By the end, you'll have a clear mental model and a path to plug Python into the internet of agents. 00:36 This is Talk Python To Me, episode 526, recorded September 30th, 2025. 00:43 Talk Python To Me, yeah, we ready to roll. 00:46 Upgrading the code, no fear of getting old. 00:48 Async in the air, new frameworks in sight. 00:51 Geeky rap on deck. 00:52 Quarth crew, it's time to unite. 00:54 We started in Pyramid, cruising old school. 00:57 lanes. Had that stable base. Yes. Welcome to Talk Python To Me, the number one podcast for Python 01:02 developers and data scientists. This is your host, Michael Kennedy. I'm a PSF fellow who's been coding 01:07 for over 25 years. Let's connect on social media. You'll find me and Talk Python on Mastodon, 01:13 Bluesky, and X. The social links are all in the show notes. You can find over 10 years of past 01:19 episodes at talkpython.fm. And if you want to be part of the show, you can join our recording 01:24 live streams. That's right. We live stream the raw uncut version of each episode on YouTube. 01:30 Just visit talkpython.fm/youtube to see the schedule of upcoming events. And be sure to 01:36 subscribe and press the bell so you'll get notified anytime we're recording. This episode is sponsored 01:41 by Posit Connect from the makers of Shiny. Publish, share, and deploy all of your data projects that 01:47 you're creating using Python. Streamlit, Dash, Shiny, Bokeh, FastAPI, Flask, Quarto, Reports, 01:54 dashboards, and APIs. Posit Connect supports all of them. Try Posit Connect for free by going to 02:00 talkpython.fm/posit, P-O-S-I-T. And it's brought to you by Nordstellar. Nordstellar is a 02:07 threat exposure management platform from the Nord security family, the folks behind NordVPN, 02:13 that combines dark web intelligence, session hijacking prevention, brand and domain abuse 02:19 detection, and external attack surface management. Learn more and get started keeping your team safe 02:24 at talkpython.fm/nordstellar. Hey, I want to take just a minute and talk to you guys. I just 02:31 released a really cool new course called Agentic AI Programming for Python Developers and Data 02:36 Scientists. You've heard me mention a couple times on the podcast how I've had some incredible success 02:42 with some of these Agentic AI coding tools. I hear people talking about how they're not really 02:47 working for them. And then I look at the results that I'm getting and think, wow, that's something 02:53 that would have taken two weeks. It's built in two hours and it's well factored and good looking code. 03:00 What gives? Why is this difference here? Well, I decided to create this course to share all the 03:06 things that I'm doing with these agentic coding tools with the idea of making you as successful 03:12 and productive as well. Yes, I know we're all tired about hearing about how AI is going to 03:17 change everything for software developers. 03:19 But there are some tools here that will give you truly difference 03:23 making levels of productivity. 03:25 And that's what this course is about. 03:27 So check it out at talkpython.fm/agenticai. 03:31 The links in your podcast player show notes. 03:33 Let's get to the interview. 03:35 Ben, welcome to Talk Python To Me. 03:36 Great to have you here. 03:37 Hello, hello. 03:38 I'm excited to be here. 03:39 I'm a big fan of Talk Python. 03:41 I'm a big fan of you and I'm a big fan of Python. 03:43 So there we go. 03:45 Wow. 03:45 Thank you. 03:46 I've been on your show, Work Item, which was really fun. 03:49 Thank you for having me. 03:50 And now it's time to dive into your expertise. 03:53 I'm going to talk agentic stuff, and especially we're going to talk model context protocol, MCP. 04:01 I think this is one of the really important layers that is kind of invisible, right? 04:05 A lot of the coding agents and coding AI and chat LLMs and all that, 04:10 that's what people think when they hear all these things. 04:13 But there's got to be plumbing, right? 04:15 We're going to talk to plumbing. 04:16 - There has to be, yeah. 04:17 - Nothing is more amazing than plumbing. 04:18 Like we all get excited about plumbing. 04:20 So no. 04:21 - I know. 04:22 - Technology plumbing is cool. 04:25 - Yeah. 04:25 I mean, it's one of those things too, that look at how fast it grew. 04:28 Think about it like last year at this time, like at the time when we were recording 04:32 the work item episode, MCP did not exist. 04:34 - Yeah. 04:34 - Just not a thing. 04:35 - That's wild. 04:35 - And now everybody's talking about MCP. 04:38 Like you talk to any big companies, you talk to like the banks, the healthcare, the gaming, 04:44 Like everybody, everybody cares about MCP. 04:46 That's great. 04:46 It's very great. 04:48 We're going to dive into it. 04:49 Before we do, let's dive into you. 04:51 Give us a quick background on yourself. 04:53 Absolutely. 04:53 So I am Den Delamarski. 04:54 I am a principal product engineer at Microsoft. 04:57 I work in the core AI division. 05:00 So we're focusing on, as the name suggests, AI stuff, but applied to developers. 05:06 So I'm very, very heavily in the developer ecosystem. 05:09 And I'm one of the core maintainers of the Model Converse Protocol. 05:13 So I say one of because there's many of us. 05:15 It's not just me. 05:16 There's many wonderful, talented people way smarter than me. 05:19 And yeah, that's a short intro. 05:21 Okay. 05:22 So when we talk about MCP, you're one of the people helping build it. 05:26 That's incredible. 05:27 That is correct. 05:29 Yeah. 05:29 I try to contribute as much as I can. 05:31 Well, you know, before we move on, just how'd you get into that position? 05:36 Oh, it all started with one of the things that was actually near and dear to my heart, 05:40 which is security and authorization. 05:41 So when MCP first came out, it had a auth spec. 05:45 So we see on the screen right now, Michael is showing the kind of the model context vertical 05:49 specification page. 05:51 But when MCP first started, it had essentially a spec that outlines how to do authorization 05:57 for MCP servers. 05:58 And that spec was a good start, but it made a lot of assumptions about the infrastructure 06:04 and the tooling and how developers build MCP servers that were, I want to say, a little 06:08 flawed at scale. 06:09 So my thought was like, oh, I'll just get some smart people with me and we'll help rewrite this. 06:15 And we asked the MCP folks at Anthropic and they said yes. 06:18 And so we did. 06:19 And I basically like incorporate all the feedback and iterated on it. 06:23 And then again, it's a massive community effort. 06:26 We pushed it out and got it merged in the June version of the protocol. 06:29 And then the folks at Anthropic just reached out and said, hey, do you want to help shape the protocol? 06:35 And here I am helping shape the protocol. 06:37 You seem to know what you're talking about and you sure are participating a lot. Why don't you just hang around? 06:41 Yeah, basically. 06:42 Okay, that's great. And you work at Microsoft. What do you do there? 06:46 That is correct. At Microsoft, I work on developer tools. So think like if you ever use Copilot, if you ever use any, oh, by the way, GitHub spec kit for folks that have not heard about it, we released it like last month. 06:58 But that's something that I helped drive and help maintain is how do you do spec driven development with agentic tools, agentic coding tools? 07:06 Yeah, that's what I do. 07:07 Okay, cool. 07:08 So something that I've started to do a lot when I'm involving AI, I go in like spurts. 07:14 I'll work for a long time, just sort of writing regular. 07:16 And then I'm like, ah, this is really a lot of drudgery, not critical or central to what I'm doing. 07:21 Let me just uncork some agentic AI on it and let it go. 07:25 But one of the things I've started doing a lot, and it has to do with the spec thing that you've touched on here, 07:30 is I will force, I'll pick a really high level model, like a complex smart model. 07:36 And I'll say, I want to plan this out. 07:39 I've given you some ideas, look at the code and let's create a detailed plan 07:42 of what you're gonna do. 07:43 And I'll have it write a markdown file. 07:45 And even though a lot of my projects, I have just a plans folder 07:47 and it's just full of all these different projects. 07:49 You know, maybe they're sort of equivalent to a PR in the end. 07:52 - Yeah. 07:52 - And I'll plan that out really well. 07:54 Then I'll switch it down to a lower model, to a new context and say, let's just do phase one. 07:58 Let's do phase two and knock it out. 08:00 That sounds like a Michael just made up some stuff equivalent of the spec based programming. 08:06 Is that right? 08:06 Like, how does that compare to what you're talking about here? 08:09 It's close. 08:10 It's very close. 08:10 And this is where when when people talk about spec driven development, I want to emphasize 08:14 the fact that there's no one correct approach. 08:17 Like people think that it's like, oh, I'm just going to wait for whatever company is 08:20 going to come out and come up with the right thing. 08:21 Like it all depends on your experience. 08:23 It depends on your models. 08:25 The spec kit project that we launched is our hypothesis, our experiment on how we believe 08:30 And what it does is basically what do you describe? 08:32 You start with a spec. 08:34 You start outlining what and why I am building. 08:37 Then you focus on the technical implementation plan, which is like, OK, now what technology stack I'm using here. 08:43 And then you break that down into tasks, which are basically just consumable chunks that the AI can go and either iteratively or in parallel execute and build the stuff that you want to build. 08:54 So all of it, again, is still an experiment. 08:56 So I'm not by any stretch claiming that what we have is the end of it all or the right way to do this. 09:02 There's many, many ways to do this. 09:04 Okay. 09:04 And you even over on DevBlogs wrote, diving into spec-driven development with GitHub SpecKit. 09:11 That is correct. 09:11 There's also a GitHub blog that I highly recommend folks check out. 09:14 It's actually on the github.blog. 09:17 So you can go there and look for, there you go. 09:19 It's called Spec-Driven Development with AI. 09:21 Get started with a new open source toolkit. 09:23 And we do have an open source toolkit. 09:25 All right. So how is this different than just what I've done? I know I've seen this before. 09:29 Yeah. Okay. Yeah. It just, all it does is think of it as this is the recipe book, 09:34 right? Like if you decided to like, Oh, I want to cook up a new application and you're like, 09:39 well, what's the recipe? Like this bundles the recipe for instance. And by the way, 09:43 here's the box set of ingredients that you can just use to build this. That's what this is. 09:47 That's SpecKit. Okay. Well, very exciting. Let's maybe start to get into the main topic though. 09:54 So MCP servers. 09:56 I've heard this put out as sort of an analogy to the LSP, which I know is, I first heard of it in VS Code. 10:05 I don't know if it came from VS Code. 10:07 Maybe it did, but it's the thing that allows so many different editors to plug into tooling 10:14 like PyLance or Powerfly or ty or a bunch of cool things are coming out around here, 10:19 different implementations of LSPs. 10:22 And I've heard that MCPs are kind of like that for AI. 10:26 Maybe contrast those a bit for people. 10:30 Yeah. 10:30 I mean, if you look at the MCP specification, if you look through the website 10:34 and just peruse through the documentation, you might have like faint echoes of LSP design decisions, 10:40 faint echoes of kind of the LSP architecture. 10:42 But yes, basically think of it this way. 10:44 The way the folks at Anthropic have been describing it, it is USB-C for AI. 10:50 And when I say that is the problem with a lot of the LLMs, a lot of the modern models is the fact that it takes a some amount of time to train them, which means that inherently they get locked into a specific training date, if you will. 11:06 So the corpus of knowledge that gets embedded in them gets locked at a certain date. 11:11 And when you talk to a lot of enterprise customers, you talk to a lot of customers in the wild, 11:15 it doesn't need to be enterprise, by the way, it could be startups, could be hobbies, developers 11:18 like, well, I want to use AI with this fresh data that I have. 11:23 Maybe I have, I don't know, a Dropbox account and I want to use AI to sort my files. 11:27 Or maybe I want to use some data inside Salesforce to go and help me analyze my sales and find 11:34 out outliers and maybe customers I want to focus on. And I just interviewed the people from Nice Guy, 11:40 Nice GUI, and they build robots that cruise around in architectural areas. Like what maybe I want a, 11:48 I want some way to like ask AI, look at how the robots are doing now and then, or see if they're 11:55 busy, find a free one, right? That might be a thing, huh? Yeah. Yeah, no, for sure. Exactly. 12:00 It's like any kind of live data or managed data, something that is more dynamic than the corpus of knowledge that is embedded in these models by default. 12:09 And for those, if I would ask you like, OK, well, let's imagine a world where MCP does not exist. 12:14 How would you go about plugging this data in like into your LLM? Right. 12:19 And like there's different ways to do this. Like people have done like the rags. 12:25 People have done, you know, dump like CSV files and then be like, oh, analyze the CSV file and all these like hacky solutions. 12:31 But it feels like it's not universal. 12:34 It doesn't really work for all cases. 12:35 And something that you've done in one LLM doesn't work in another. 12:39 And now you're locked into this environment. 12:41 So it becomes very hard to manage. 12:43 So MCP is essentially the answer to that. 12:45 MCP says, look, we don't care what data you're connecting to, what applications, what actions. 12:50 we provide you a universal interface by which every single LLM, every single client that 12:57 understands MCP can invoke those primitives, get the data and embed the data in the context that 13:02 you're operating in. And that's another thing, important thing. People think of MCP as the data 13:06 connector, but it's not only a data connector. It's a, I want to call it like a primitive connector 13:11 because you can use MCP with a lot of wonderful things that folks have probably seen already. 13:15 Like I, my favorite example here is Blender MCP. Like for folks that don't know, Blender is a 3D 13:20 modeling tool. And there's an MCP server by which you can actually guide an LLM saying like, I am 13:25 building this like medieval scene with a dragon and the lighting and so, and it goes and it just, 13:30 it builds it for you, right? Through this MCP and MCP is the connective layer between Blender, 13:36 which has its own native API. And then there's the MCP server that the LLM knows how to talk to, 13:42 right? Because the LLM wouldn't know how to like, okay, how do you talk to Blender? How do you, 13:45 how do you go and set up the plugin and whatever the web sockets, whatever they might be using, 13:50 It's super complex, so it needs expertise, but an MCP server is essentially saying, I have these set of primitives that the LLM can invoke at any time, like create polygon or create scene or create sphere, and then based on that information, go and iterate on it. 14:03 So MCP is that adapter. 14:05 Yeah, I see. 14:06 So the LLM or agentic AI or whatever that you're working with, it says, all right, I'm going to talk to Blender. 14:12 Blender says, I have these core ideas, these core building blocks. 14:15 it sort of turns it more into Lego instead of just I'm going to have a saw or whatever I can 14:21 go. Exactly. Okay, I have spheres, I have cylinders, I have squares, I have shading. 14:28 They've asked me to do this. What can I build composing that sort of? Exactly. Precisely. Right. 14:33 So it's you're operating on a set of primitives, right? And this is where you don't even need to 14:37 expose the entirety of the surface of blender API's. You can just say like, oh, I want to have like, 14:42 there's the 10 primitives that I think are the most valuable. 14:44 I'm going to go ahead and use those. 14:46 And out of those, you compose things. 14:48 And maybe there's an advantage to that too, right? 14:50 Maybe you're like, I want to use Blender to create 2D scenes. 14:53 So I'm only going to expose stuff or rotations or whatever that preserves some sort of 2D view of the thing. 14:59 Like it's, we're doing CAD where it's top down from the side. 15:02 Like those are the ways you're going to look at. 15:03 You can't arbitrarily rotate it. 15:04 Yeah. 15:05 So yeah, so essentially like the MCP servers in this case act as a universal translation layer between whatever's downstream 15:11 of the MC server, which can be an application, an API, a database, like anything. And the client, 15:18 which knows like, I know how to talk to MCP and nothing else. I have no idea what's behind. I 15:22 don't know what the REST API you have, what's the authentication authorization logic, 15:26 just give an MCP server. Okay. It sounds a little bit like an API. And by API, I mean, 15:32 yes, most general sense of the word not, oh, it's a REST API. And it makes sure it uses the verbs 15:38 this way. I mean, like anything that you you could sort of call and either get data or cause an 15:43 action that could be a REST API, but it could just be, you know, an OS level API or some something 15:49 like that. Yeah, right. Yeah, totally. I mean, it's all it is just a connective layer. So yeah, 15:55 and people often ask like, well, couldn't you do this with like REST APIs? Couldn't you do this 16:00 with a GraphQL APIs instead? Right? Because like, it's been invented. Why are we creating new 16:05 things. But the thing about this is, even if you look in the world of REST APIs, like think about 16:10 the last time you worked with a REST API from some vendor and then switched another REST API from 16:15 someone, how much of that knowledge was like one-to-one reused or the infrastructure that 16:19 you built or authentication logic? You have like, you have these like 17 different dances by which 16:23 you get the token, right? And MCP essentially is the opinionated version of saying, no, this is how 16:31 you do auth. This is how you do message passing between entities. This is how you expose primitives. 16:37 It's a highly opinionated stack. This portion of Talk Python and me is brought to you by Sentry's 16:43 AI agent monitoring. Are you building AI capabilities into your Python applications? 16:49 Whether you're using open AI, local LLMs, or something else, visibility into your AI agent's 16:55 behavior, performance, and cost is critical. You will definitely want to give Sentry's brand new 17:01 AI agent monitoring a look. 17:03 AI agent monitoring gives you transparent observability into every step of your AI features 17:09 so you can debug, optimize, and control the cost with confidence. 17:14 You'll get full observability into every step of your AI agent. 17:17 That is model calls, prompts, external tool usage, and custom logic steps. 17:23 AI agent monitoring captures every step of an AI agent's workflow 17:27 from the user's input to the final response. 17:30 And your app will have a dedicated AI agent's dashboard showing traces and timelines for each agent run. 17:37 You'll get alerts on model errors, latency spikes, token usage surges, and API failures protecting both performance and cost. 17:46 It's plug-and-play Python SDK integration. 17:49 Open AI for now for Django, Flask, and FastAPI apps with more AI platforms coming soon. 17:55 In summary, AI agent monitoring turns the often black box behavior of AI in your app 18:01 into transparent, debuggable processes. 18:05 If you're adding AI capabilities to your Python app, give Sentry's AI agent monitoring the look. 18:10 Just visit talkpython.fm/sentry agents to get started and be sure to use our code, TALKPYTHON, one word, all caps. 18:19 The link is in your podcast player's show notes. 18:22 Thank you to Sentry for supporting Talk Python and me. 18:25 And so then once implemented them, we call them the hosts like VS Code or PyCharm or cursor or whatever, cloud code, it knows, all right, here's how I inspect the capabilities of this thing. 18:38 Here's how I stream back the responses if it's going to take it 10 minutes to do what I asked it. 18:43 This is how you do it with streaming HTTP APIs and so on. 18:46 Precisely, right? 18:47 Because you only need to then implement once. 18:50 And especially if you use one of the existing MCP SDKs that we're going to be talking down 18:54 the line, like that's the core value prop is like you do it once and it just works. 18:59 You don't need to worry about like, oh, but this other MCP server decided to implement 19:02 their auth in a completely different way. 19:04 What do I do now? 19:05 Yeah. 19:05 Now, if I want to build one of these things, does it does it have to be implemented in 19:11 an LLM or can I build just a traditional FastAPI API that ultimately does queries against 19:19 a database with no, no prompt? 19:22 Yeah, no, I mean, like MCP servers themselves are just essentially entities that they're 19:29 capable of exchanging JSON RPC messages. 19:31 Like you can absolutely, you can write a client that is completely detached from an LLM and 19:35 just invokes tools, right? 19:36 Okay. 19:37 Right. 19:37 Awesome. 19:38 You can, if you want to, I don't know why you would do that, but you 19:41 Absolutely can. 19:42 I'm sure people have a reason. 19:44 So I see a comment out in the audience from Frankie about RAG. 19:48 And also, you mentioned RAG at the beginning. 19:51 You say, well, maybe RAG is not working for you. 19:53 Let's just sort of contrast that a bit, right? 19:56 Like, maybe not everyone knows what RAG is. 19:58 Retrieval Augmented Generation. 20:00 What is this? 20:01 Yeah, essentially, if you have a way for you to optimize, basically, the context for the LLM. 20:07 I'll put it this way. 20:09 in very layman terms, it's like, I have a code base. 20:12 I have a code base that has a number of entities like classes and functions and everything. 20:19 And in a rag, you're essentially building a vector database 20:23 that says like, okay, here's the list of things that exist. 20:26 And then the LLM, you can go and query this thing and find out what exists in this code base. 20:31 So if you make decisions about like, I want to build a authorization component, 20:35 how do I do this? 20:36 Like, okay, well, it can build out that context for itself. 20:39 This is kind of the very basic idea behind the rag. 20:42 Got it. 20:43 So instead of trying to put all the information just into a prompt, 20:46 it has to read every time you can kind of additionally train it on these things 20:50 and then keep the question shorter because it knows the details. 20:54 Right. 20:54 You essentially have a knowledge base that's outside of the primary training set. 20:59 Like that's the core value prop of this is you're augmenting the LLM 21:03 with additional knowledge that you have in the context that you're operating in. 21:07 Okay. So something I've wanted to build for a while, and I do intend to, but we'll see if I 21:13 ever get there, is something where people could go and have like an AI conversation with this 21:18 episode, for example, right? With something on the podcast, I've got 10 years of transcripts. 21:23 Yeah. 21:23 You know, like over a million words, I'm pretty sure. That doesn't fit in most contexts. And 21:33 thing for Talk Python. Maybe there's an MCP angle that's really interesting. Like, what could I do 21:40 with MCPs in the podcast, do you think? MCPs in a podcast. So one of them, of course, is like querying 21:45 the data, which is I want to make sure that, you know, find me all the episodes where I ever talked 21:51 with Michael about AI, right? It could be one thing. I actually think that because of the richness of 21:59 the MCP capabilities, to me, when it comes to like podcasts, I envision a world where I can use MCP 22:03 piece to edit podcasts. That's my dream of this. And actually, like this is something that I've 22:08 been experimenting with because I haven't fully wrapped around kind of like how exactly that would 22:15 look like. But one of the things that I do, like as I'm sure you do when you edit the podcast, 22:18 you know, you have to go through it, generate the transcript, clean up things, then make sure that 22:24 you add timestamps, select the most interesting parts about the podcast. So can I potentially go 22:30 and say, okay, here's where my MP3 file is. 22:34 Can you go and generate transcript, clean it up, 22:37 and then find me the most interesting parts about this and then produce me a report 22:42 that I can then use to maybe like a HTML-based web app and I can just like a one-click save like publish, right? 22:49 And to me, like the value of maybe the MCP connector here is that maybe I can plug it in behind the scenes 22:54 with like FFmpeg to go and convert the MP3 into a WAV file and then use whisper to go and generate the transcript and then go and extract things for it 23:03 right and for a lot of these pieces of the tasks that you need to do you would imagine that you 23:07 would have a different tool inside my mc server which is tool is one of the primitives that 23:11 basically a lm invokes and it says oh let me generate the transcript and there's a tool that's 23:15 called generate transcript and it's gonna have that to produce a transcript and it's like okay 23:19 there's another tool that says yeah yes you could give just give the lm an episode number 200 or 23:26 something. And it could go to your podcast MCP server and say, transcript for 200, even if it 23:33 doesn't exist, it'll figure it out and generate it, that kind of stuff. Yes. And also the wonderful 23:38 thing about LLMs and MCP servers is that you're not actually using just one MCP server, right? So 23:43 I might have an MCP server for myself that is basically, like I said, the one that generates 23:47 transcripts, you know, creates a landing page in my podcast website. And then based on that content, 23:54 there's also next steps. Now I have an MP3, I want to upload that MP3 to Cloudflare, where I host my 23:59 podcast. So there may be a Cloudflare MCP server that the LM is going to invoke and say, I need to 24:04 now upload this. And then it's going to invoke the other MCP server, right? So you have this 24:08 basically stack of MCP servers that you can start using one with another. And that's where the 24:12 superpower comes from. Like you're not just using one application and saying like, okay, hold on, 24:15 let me, let me finish a task for podcast production. Then I'll do other things. Like it can chain 24:19 things together and then say, oh, and by the way, there's an MCP server maybe for audio conversion 24:23 that produces like 10 variations of the format. 24:26 Let me invoke that. 24:27 And then you're going through this process. 24:28 Yeah, I think that's one of the really big, hints at one of the really big differences 24:32 between just using a chat LLM versus some of the agent tool using types of things, right? 24:39 The ability to say, now I have to accomplish this task. 24:42 And I know I figured out there is some way I'm capable of accomplishing that, right? 24:46 Either that's to list a directory, to look for a file or to communicate with the Cloudflare MCP 24:52 that we talked about and so on. 24:55 Yeah, it's power is composability. 24:57 I'll put it this way. 24:58 It's the fact that you can compose things together and have them work together 25:01 based on the prompts that you have and scenarios that you have. 25:04 Okay, cool. 25:05 So imagining the Cloud Player MCP thing exists, your podcast preparation MCP thing exists. 25:12 How does my AI know? 25:14 Let's keep it real basic. 25:15 Let's say I'm using Claude Code, but we could plug this into others, 25:19 but just even something just terminal-based, no UI or whatever, like, yeah, it just is it going to discover them just out of the blue? 25:26 Probably not all of them. You got to point it at them. And yeah, how does it know which ones it's 25:30 allowed to use in this context? Right? Like, how do I get it so I can actually use one of these? 25:34 And we'll talk about maybe building them. Yeah. So for MCP servers themselves, you add them 25:39 explicitly to your host or your client, whatever that might be. VS Code, cloud code, cloud desktop, 25:44 doesn't matter. So you explicitly say, I want to use my podcast MCP. I want to be using my 25:49 Cloudflare MCP server. I want to use my, I don't know, Descript MCP servers to remove the ums and 25:54 uhs from the podcast, right? So you would essentially go through some means in that client, 25:59 on your client of choice, to go and add those MCP servers. Now, the question is, how do you 26:03 discover those MCP servers? So there's various places where you can go to. We just launched the 26:08 MCP registry that is nothing short other than an API that indexes all of the available MCP servers 26:15 that are out there, right? 26:17 So we're looking right now at a blog post on the MCP blog. 26:20 It's called Introducing the MCP Registry that got published September 8th of this year. 26:24 So not that long ago, but basically- 26:26 22 days or something like that. 26:28 And when you say we, you're talking the official 26:30 model context protocol.io working group. 26:33 Yes, yes. 26:34 The model context protocol folks, and there's a bunch of them 26:36 that were specifically focused on the registry, right? 26:39 And you see them in the authors like David Sariapara, Adam Jones, 26:44 But they essentially were in charge of kind of building this out. 26:47 And the registry is a centralized API, essentially, that aggregates an index of MCP servers that are out there. 26:54 So you can use the registry inside your client, whatever client you might be using, to find MCP servers for what you want. 27:00 Maybe there is a Playwright MCP server. 27:02 Maybe there is a Perplexity MCP server. 27:05 So it's all coming from the registry. 27:06 Okay. 27:07 Sounds a little bit like Docker Hub. 27:09 Kind of. 27:10 Yes. 27:10 And just like Docker Hub, you actually don't need Docker Hub to install an MCP server. 27:14 or in this case, like a Docker container, right? 27:15 Like you can just go to random GitHub repos and find somebody to build an MCV server 27:19 for what you're trying to do, and you can just plug it in. 27:21 - Yeah, interesting. 27:22 Yeah, that's how I use Docker Hub by not using Docker Hub for all the stuff I build, 27:26 but you know, I get the foundations. 27:27 - I know it exists. 27:29 - Exactly, I'm like, ah, but I'm gonna build it here. 27:32 It also has the concept of public and private registries. 27:35 - Yes, yeah. 27:36 So public registry is essentially something that like GitHub, 27:40 by the way, maintains their own registry, right? 27:42 So it's public and you can just go and discover MCP servers through the GitHub registry or the public registry. 27:48 Also, we know that MCP servers are used within different companies. 27:51 You might have, let's say, some data that you're locking in behind seven gates that only certain people can access. 27:59 You can build internal MCP servers. 28:01 And for those things, you ship internal private registries where you can say, no, no, no. 28:06 I want my folks in my company to only access these servers and nothing else. 28:11 Right. 28:11 Sure. 28:12 Yeah, that makes sense. Is there a place that I can go to the model context protocol registry, the MCP registry and like browse it like you can? 28:20 Yeah. Yeah. So right now you can't browse it through a UI, but you can look at other registries that can consume some of the content from here. 28:29 So like I believe GitHub registry is one of the consumers. 28:32 So you can look at I think it's gethub.com slash MCP. 28:35 There we go. 28:36 Yeah. 28:36 Okay. 28:37 And you can see some of the registries and you can see like if you click on one of the install buttons is going to like allow you 28:42 to take it directly into like VS Code and then just bring it in and install it 28:46 in the context of your editor. 28:47 - Okay, yeah, very nice. 28:49 So some of these are like web crawling, Notion. 28:52 Okay, I know Notion just added a big agentic AI thing and I've seen a lot of pushback. 28:58 There's probably a lot of happy users who just use it, but people are like, why is this in my way? 29:02 I just wanna work with this. 29:04 But you know, if you were, it'd be really cool to maybe plug that in instead of going, 29:08 we're gonna try to use the API to download this embedded database with the information. 29:13 - Exactly. 29:14 - Like you just talk to it, right? 29:15 - Exactly. 29:16 That's again, what I like about MCP is that if I want to connect to Notion to get my notebook 29:22 and some notes from my standup meetings, I don't need to worry about how they structure their API 29:26 and how to use auth or something. 29:27 Just install the Notion MCP and then ask the alum, pull the latest notes and summarize them for me. 29:32 And then it's gonna know. 29:33 - It's their LinkedIn one. 29:34 Their API is so bad. 29:35 - Oh. 29:37 - Oh. 29:37 - Oh, it makes me sad. 29:39 For any LinkedIn people watching this, we need to have a LinkedIn MCP server. 29:42 - Yes, I think so. 29:44 It might save me. 29:45 Okay, very interesting here. 29:47 I think people should come here and just kind of poke around. 29:50 You can see there's a lot of, a lot of interesting things that I think might 29:53 spark some ideas. 29:55 - Yeah. 29:55 - As you start to play with it, you know, like Postman. 29:58 So I guess one of the problem, well, not one of the problems, 30:00 one of the things you're gonna want to deal with is, a lot of these I see here, 30:04 LaunchDarkly, Postman, Atlassian, Notion, and so on. 30:08 You got to pass things like I am this person. 30:11 Therefore, I want to see my information, not other people's or only public. 30:16 I got to see private info, but mine. 30:18 There's a whole security side. 30:19 And I think that's kind of how you got pulled into it, right? 30:22 Yeah. 30:22 Oh, yeah. 30:23 Yeah. 30:23 So for these things. 30:25 Yeah. 30:25 We just put like an API key in GitHub and you just check that in and just use that when you're trying to. 30:30 Don't do that. 30:31 Don't put API keys in GitHub and check them in. 30:33 What can be done, so starting with the latest spec of MCP that, again, shipped in June, there is a formal way for services to do authorization. 30:42 So it's based on OAuth, OAuth 2.1. 30:45 I know that there's people listening that's like, oh, no, did you just say OAuth? 30:49 I have to learn OAuth now. 30:50 You don't. 30:51 Again, there's a lot of libraries that do this. 30:53 If you're an MCP server developer, it's solved for you. 30:55 If you're an MCP server consumer, you don't even need to think about it. 30:58 So when you connect an MCP server, as a consumer, you'll essentially have the ability to log in with your credentials. 31:04 So if an MCP server, for example, for like we saw Chromo and we're like MongoDB, that's on the screen here. 31:10 If I use the MongoDB server and I want to connect to a database, usually they provide you a way to either one. 31:16 You go into your MCP server config and you say, I will give you an API key if your server is using an API key. 31:22 Or if it's using OAuth, then you can just essentially snap to using OAuth the standard flow. 31:28 Your client is going to bootstrap the authentication flow. 31:31 You're going to go to the box, enter your credentials, log in. 31:33 The client is going to store the tokens, and then you access the server with your credentials as you getting access to your data, not something else. 31:41 One thing that looks really interesting, and there's an example of it right here with the Nux. 31:46 Never written a Nux app in my life, but here we have. 31:49 I have one that helps you understand your Vite Nux app. 31:53 One of the things that I think could be really interesting and probably MCPs could play a really important role is we have these huge foundation models, OpenAI and Cloud Opus and so on, that are generally knowledgeable about the whole world and are big, expensive to train. 32:09 But I can see a future where we get good enough to have a bunch of small models. 32:13 Like this is the Vue.js model. 32:17 If you need to know Vue.js, it's as good as anything, but it runs on your computer in a gig of RAM because it's just trained so specifically on Vue. 32:26 And I feel like maybe you could MCP your way together like, well, I'm using this tech stack. 32:31 So we're going to click together a bunch of things that don't provide data, but provide information about what your architecture or something like that. 32:39 What do you think? 32:39 Yeah, I mean, I think it can go both ways, right? 32:41 Like there's a specialized model. 32:42 And there's an argument for saying that the more general scenarios would always work best. 32:47 Like there's, I think there's always two camps of those folks that I talk to. 32:50 I personally think that I think for certain things, there is a tremendous amount of value 32:55 for hyper centralized or hyper local models. 32:59 I'll give an example, right? 33:00 Like I want to organize the photos on my machine. 33:05 Like maybe I have a lot of duplicates that, you know, because when you take photos of your modern cell phones, 33:09 like just click, click, click, click. 33:10 and then you have like 10 images of your dog and you're like, they're kind of the same, 33:13 but I want to pick the best one. 33:14 Like from a privacy standpoint, like I don't want to send that off to some server 33:18 remotely somewhere with my photos, which, you know, there's like family photos. 33:22 There's all sorts of like stuff that I do not want to send off to some remote server. 33:25 For those things, I want to use a local model. 33:27 And maybe there's an MCP server that allows me to basically like, 33:30 oh, I can find the photos and then crop them and like add some metadata or remove metadata 33:35 or whatever I want to do, right? 33:36 So for those things, I absolutely see the value in these like local models 33:40 where I can just say, I want it to be very good at this one specific task and that task only. And I 33:45 will never use this photo model for web app creation, but photos is going to be darn good. 33:49 And I think there's a lot of value for that. And if you augment it with MCP, I think it's 33:53 superpowers right there. Yeah, it does seem like it could be. It could be this little step would 33:58 benefit from a local model, but I don't want to constrain the entire problem solving to a local 34:03 model. Right. I think that's kind of the problem. Like I use LM Studio a lot and I've got, for 34:08 For example, I have the open AI 20 billion parameter open weights model that I actually 34:13 program against. 34:14 And it does all sorts of cool stuff for me, but I don't use it for my general work because 34:17 it's either too slow because it's on my Mac mini or I just want something that is better, 34:23 right? 34:23 Yeah. 34:24 And so if you're going to just start a, like I'm using this model to solve this problem, 34:28 that might not be the final outcome where we end up, right? 34:34 This portion of Talk Python To Me is brought to you by Nordstellar. 34:37 Nordstellar is a threat exposure management platform from the Nord security family, 34:41 the folks behind NordVPN that combines dark web intelligence, session hijacking prevention, 34:47 brand abuse detection, and external attack service management. 34:51 Keeping your team and your company secure is a daunting challenge. 34:55 That's why you need Nordstellar on your side. 34:57 It's a comprehensive set of services, monitoring, and alerts to limit your exposure to breaches 35:03 and attacks and act instantly if something does happen. 35:07 Here's how it works. 35:08 Nordstellar detects compromised employee and consumer credentials. 35:12 It detects stolen authentication cookies found in InfoStealer logs and dark web sources 35:18 and flags compromised devices, reducing MFA bypass ATOs without extra code in your app. 35:24 Nordstellar scans the dark web for cyber threats targeting your company. 35:28 It monitors forums, markets, ransomware blogs, and over 25,000 cybercrime telegram channels 35:34 with alerting and searchable context you can route to Slack or your IRR tool. 35:39 Nordstellar adds brand and domain protection. 35:42 It detects cyber squats and lookalikes via visual, content similarity, and search transparency logs, 35:49 plus broader brand abuse takedowns across the web, social, and app stores to cut the phishing risk for your users. 35:56 They don't just alert you about impersonation, they file and manage the removals. 36:00 Finally, Nordstellar is developer-friendly. 36:03 It's available as a platform and an API. 36:06 No agents to install. 36:08 If security is important to you and your organization, check out Nordstellar. 36:11 Visit talkpython.fm/nordstellar. 36:13 The link is in your podcast player's show notes and on the episode page. 36:17 Please use our link, talkpython.fm/nordstellar so that they know that you heard about their service from us. 36:23 And you know what time of year it is. 36:25 It's late fall. 36:26 That means Black Friday is in play as well. 36:29 So the folks at Nordstellar gave us a coupon, BlackFriday20, that's BlackFriday, all one word, all caps, 20, two zero, that grants you 20% off. 36:38 So if you're going to sign up for them soon, go ahead and use BlackFriday20 as a code and you 36:43 might as well save 20%. It's good until December 10th, 2025. Thank you to the whole Nord security 36:50 team for supporting Talk Python To Me. For sure. And especially because for a lot of the generalized 36:55 models, you're like, no matter how you look at this, you're not going to have the computer 36:58 resources anywhere near what like open anthropic has right so like in terms of speed and quality 37:04 what are you going to get you might get some like fine-tuned examples where some scenarios work very 37:09 very well but i think ultimately if we look at the general use case these generalizable models 37:14 are going to be ahead yeah i i definitely agree as well but i hadn't really considered how mcps 37:19 might allow you to use the really high-end models to compose specialized not quite as generally 37:24 smart but specialized versions of different things it could be yeah mcp can do anything mcp again is 37:31 just it's it's a pipe what you do with that pipe is up to you yeah well let's talk about how one 37:37 might build such pipes with uh with python so there's actually a model context protocol github 37:45 organization within there they have the python dash sdk the official python sdk for the mcp servers 37:51 and clients. So that's also interesting, the clients bit. So maybe we could kind of like, 37:56 there's a lot of concepts and things here, and I don't want to dive too much into code, 38:01 but maybe we could work our way through some of the concepts and some of the steps of building 38:06 such a thing. Yeah, totally. Well, I mean, it all starts from just getting the SDK, right? And this 38:11 is for like anybody that's using Python. You can just get it through pip or uv. I'm a big fan of 38:16 the folks at Astral. I think they're doing a fantastic job with uv and uvx. Like I use it for 38:20 or get up spec kit. 38:21 So, you know, uv add MCP, MCP CLI. 38:25 And there you go, you can be on your way. 38:27 It's as simple as that. 38:28 - Yeah, okay, that'll do it. 38:29 And then, yeah, you can specify like the CLI options or whatever kind you want. 38:34 - Yeah, yeah. 38:35 And also it's using fast MCP. 38:37 Are you familiar with fast MCP? 38:39 - No, I know some projects with fast in it, but not MCP. 38:42 - Yeah, so fast MCP is basically, think of it like FastAPI for MCP. 38:46 It's essentially like allowing you to compose MCP servers faster because it has a lot of the primitives baked in. 38:51 So things like authorization, which can be like kind of a pain point, but if you use 38:55 Fast MCP, it makes it a little easier. 38:57 And Fast MCP is a integral part of the Python SDK story for the actual like official Python 39:03 SDK. 39:03 Right. 39:04 The programming model looks like it would feel quite familiar to anyone who knows the 39:10 Flask API or beyond. 39:12 I think it's just, you know, a little sidebar. 39:14 I think it's really interesting how Flask is quite popular, but it's also spawned almost 39:20 every single web app after it has kind of borrowed its programming model. 39:25 So even if you're not exactly using Flask, if you're using Litestar or FastAPI or whatever, 39:30 you're still kind of doing that kind of programming. 39:32 And it's the same here, right? 39:34 You create an MCP as the app, you say @mcp.tool or @mcp.prompt and you put these onto functions 39:42 and they now become webized. 39:44 Yeah. Isn't that like, okay, like I am not like I write Python, but I'm not a Python expert. I'm 39:50 sorry, Brett Cannon, if you're watching this. But like, we'll take that part out, don't we? 39:55 As a stream's life. That's okay. So like these, like the do you call in Python, do you call them 40:02 decorators? Or is it like attributes like in C#, it's attributes. Yeah, in C#, it's attributes. 40:07 You do it with square brackets. In Python, it's decorators and you do it with the @ symbol. 40:11 Okay, so the decorators themselves. Look at the simplicity of this. Look at the screen right now of a sample where we're looking at the actual Python SDK repo. And one of the samples, you literally have a Python function, you have def add, and there is your arguments, you would pass you a function, like two integers. And then all you need to do to make that a tool that an LM can invoke is just add that at mcp.tool decorator. That's it. You're not going and crafting elaborate JSON RPC envelopes and converters and all these things. 40:41 like all the stuff is done for you add a decorator boom you have a tool that's it yeah it's simple 40:45 it's yeah it's really really simple to program and there's actually some fairly complicated 40:50 data exchange stuff going on like streaming partial results as they come in because 40:56 we're all used to two things ai requests taking a real long time but b that you see the little dots 41:03 thinking thinking and periodically like some stuff that's coming by to like oh yeah okay i see where 41:07 it's going. I don't know what it's going to come up with, but at least we could see it's working, 41:11 right? So to sort of keep that flow going, you've got the streaming style, right? 41:15 Exactly. And all of this is like, again, I'm looking at the sample. It's so, 41:20 the way I would describe it as a delightful developer experience. If I'm a developer, 41:24 I focus on writing the core functions. I don't have to worry about like, well, 41:27 how do I make this into a tool? Put a decorator on. That's how you make it a tool. 41:31 Yeah. Excellent. So I have this server and you mentioned that it's fast, 41:37 FastAPI or flask like how do I host it once once I call run or whatever I do on it yeah then what 41:44 I know I probably don't put it straight on the internet maybe I do I don't know so there's two 41:47 types of servers that you can have you can have local mcp servers and local mcp servers are 41:53 essentially just a local application think of it running like a console app or like your regular 41:57 python script and what it does it there might be referred to you might hear like they're called stdio 42:02 for standard input output. 42:03 And it's using basically native OS constructs to talk between processes, right? 42:08 The MCP client and the server. 42:10 So again, it's still JSON RPC, but JSON RPC over SDDIO pipes. 42:14 So the other one is streamable HTTP. 42:17 And streamable HTTP, it's again, MCP server that can be hosted somewhere in the cloud. 42:22 It can be hosted on your own home lab server if you want to, and you give it an IP address. 42:26 You can be hosted in AWS or Azure, GCP, doesn't really matter. 42:31 So for those servers, the JSON-RPC messages are basically done through the HTTP pipe with some set of HTTP conventions. 42:37 That's kind of where it is. 42:39 There's no constraint as to where you have to host it. 42:42 It's whoever supports running Python can host your MCP server. 42:47 Right, okay. 42:48 So I could put it behind Nginx or Caddy or whatever. 42:51 Like toss it into a container and put it somewhere. 42:54 Like it's totally fine. 42:55 Okay. 42:55 You know, you talked about all these sort of different, like, private, but online, but not quite online, you know, with, like, HomeLab and stuff. 43:02 I just want to give a shout out to Tailscale. 43:05 Like, have you? 43:05 Oh, yes. 43:06 Have you Tailscaled lately? 43:07 Oh, it is so good. 43:08 It is wonderful. 43:09 I love Tailscale. 43:10 It's my go-to thing. 43:12 And I'll tell you this. 43:12 Like, do you remember the days when you had to work? 43:14 This episode is not sponsored by Tailscale, for the record. 43:18 Should be. 43:19 Should be. 43:19 They can reach out. 43:20 Yeah. 43:21 Yeah. 43:21 Hey, Tailscale. 43:22 Yeah. 43:23 Yeah. 43:23 Michael Talks is awesome. 43:24 You should sponsor it. 43:25 But anyway. 43:25 So TailScale is great. 43:26 Like, remember the olden days when you had to like set up an open VPN 43:29 and be like, let me generate the keys. 43:31 Let me email myself the key so I can open it on the iPhone 43:34 and then add the key and then go through this process. 43:36 And it's just like, oh, man, such a pain. 43:39 Such a pain. 43:40 TailScale, just like flip the switch and you're in. 43:42 Yeah. 43:43 Magic. 43:43 Or DynDNS where you... 43:46 Oh, yeah. 43:46 Because you have to bind your IP address to their domain 43:50 and then you have to run this agent to constantly update it. 43:53 Oh, yes. 43:54 Yeah, the agent goes down change. Well, then there's also all the NAT firewall and your local machine on your local 43:59 network change. You're like, no, it doesn't work. Oh, it's my machine on my, we had a power outage 44:04 when the router rebooted, I got a new IP. It just, it was so bad. And so why is this sidebar worth 44:10 going into here, folks? Because this is what's called an overlay network. And so you can put it 44:16 up on your iPhone, you can put it on your laptop, you can put it on your desktop, you can put it on 44:19 your Linux server if you want. And it basically exposes all of those things over a network that's 44:25 like a VPN, but the rest of your behavior is just not VPN. 44:29 It's just normal, but it just brings those in in just the most incredible way. 44:33 So for example, I have a high-end Mac mini here that I use for the streaming that I'm talking to you on now. 44:39 It has tons of RAM and it has a pro chip and stuff. 44:41 So I just have my one LLM and my database servers running there. 44:46 And when I'm doing dev work, instead of every, you know, my laptop, 44:50 my other machine always running in replica, it all just goes here to this. 44:54 And even if I'm in a coffee shop or I'm out for work, right? 44:57 As long as TailScale is running, I do a database query or an LLM call through an API and it 45:02 just hits this thing. 45:03 Yep. 45:03 Just as if I was here. 45:04 And it's glorious. 45:06 And all that's for free, right? 45:06 There's paid versions, but you can do a lot. 45:08 Yeah. 45:09 You can do a lot for free. 45:10 In their free tier, it's amazing. 45:12 And it's all WireGuard. 45:13 It's all using the most modern secure standards. 45:17 I'll say to me, if you want to access things like, oh, your security camera is at home, 45:21 you do not trust cloud providers to have access to your security home cameras, put them in your 45:26 local network and use tail scale. And then you can go somewhere, flip the switch in your phone, 45:30 boom, you can see your cameras from remote without exposing them to the broader internet. It's 45:33 amazing. You don't open up any ports on your router, nothing like that. So why am I going on 45:39 such an excited diversion? One, it's just so awesome. And I just recently discovered it this 45:43 year. So it's a thing, but it's relevant. If you've got an MCP server and you want to keep it local, 45:49 even local from your server back to like your company or something potentially, 45:54 you could hide all that stuff behind tail scale. 45:57 It's like transparently available, but also there's, there's no ports. 46:01 There's no open internet. 46:02 The easiest way to secure stuff is to just not let the internet have at it. 46:06 Yeah. 46:06 Yep. 46:07 No, exactly. 46:07 This is what I've been actually doing with one of my friends who was setting up a 46:11 home lab and they were experimenting with some of the MCP servers for like, I believe 46:15 it was like setting up for like a Minecraft server. 46:17 And we just tossed them on the same server. 46:19 And because it's tail scale and then I connect them to the clients with a IP that tail scale gives me, 46:24 it just magically works. 46:25 And I didn't need to expose this to the internet. 46:27 I didn't need to pay for any cloud providers in somebody's home lab. 46:30 It's just there. 46:31 - Yeah, yeah. 46:31 And you don't need to use SSH across it. 46:33 Like you can just, it's just there. 46:35 It's all super, super good. 46:36 Okay, back, back to what I was asking. 46:39 - Back to MCP. 46:40 - Back to MCP, but I was asking, you know, how do you run it? 46:43 And you're like, I could, we could run it on our home lab or on a Raspberry Pi or something, right? 46:47 this tail scale thing is a way to sort of really nicely make that available to 46:51 you, make that available to your, your AI agents or whatever without going, well, 46:57 now how do I host it on like a server for real? Yeah. Okay. 47:01 So let's see. That is the registry. There we go. 47:04 So I want to talk about a couple of things. We talked about tools. Yeah. 47:08 And we talked about there's prompts, there's resources. 47:11 Let's maybe go through each one real quick. 47:13 These are all just decorators you put on functions, but they're all, 47:16 They're slightly different. 47:17 Yeah. 47:17 What is the purpose of a tool and why would I do that? 47:19 Yeah. 47:20 A tool basically is a function call, right? 47:22 It's like your tool equals function. 47:25 That's the way I describe it. 47:26 Like that's basically like, hey, I want the LLM to go do something. 47:29 What does it need to do? 47:30 And this is where like get weather, give me the sum. 47:34 It needs to go and do this. 47:35 This is what a tool is. 47:37 It's a primitive that does something. 47:39 Insert record into database or whatever. 47:40 This looks like you could probably find and replace Fast MCP with FastAPI and tool with 47:47 get. 47:47 Yeah. 47:47 Yeah. 47:48 And you or a post or something. 47:50 And you might be able to pretty much that is kind of the closest match, right? 47:54 Yeah, exactly. 47:55 Yep. 47:55 Yep. 47:55 That's that's basically it. 47:56 I want to invoke some kind of action. 47:59 Go do that action for me. 48:00 Right. 48:00 And at least in the examples, there's no AI in the action. 48:04 It's just. 48:05 No. 48:06 Just an AI. 48:06 The AI knows that it needs to invoke the action. 48:08 Like if I go to the LLM and say, send an email to Michael that says the podcast was awesome. 48:13 And then it's going to go in and say, oh, let me go find the tool that is capable of sending emails. 48:19 Oh, there's a tool from like, I don't know, like MailChimp. 48:21 Okay, let me go do that. 48:23 There's a tool in the MailChimp MCP server that says send email. 48:26 That sounds great. 48:27 I'm going to use that to send the email, right? 48:29 And that tool itself doesn't use AI behind the scenes. 48:31 It's just like, it's just going to do SMTP send email. 48:34 That's all it does. 48:35 Yeah. 48:35 Awesome. 48:36 It also has other examples of data exchange along the way, I guess. 48:41 Absolutely. 48:41 And you can pass in this context, and then the context can start pushing updates and information back. 48:49 Yes. 48:49 To the user, right? 48:50 And report progress back. 48:52 So, for example, if your email takes like seven hops, it's like, okay, let me first connect to the SMTP server. 48:57 Let me then verify the credentials. 48:58 Like, you can encode that basically if you implement that. 49:02 You might not, but you can implement progress reporting so that the client knows like, 49:06 oh, you're like 30% through your task or you're like 40% through your task now 49:10 because it reports on the progress of what you're doing. 49:13 - Yeah, super cool. 49:14 You can also do structured output, which is pretty interesting. 49:17 And there's many ways in which it can be done, but the number one way, 49:22 as in if it was a ordered list, the first thing would be Pydantic models, right? 49:27 Carrying on the FastAPI analogy here, right? 49:30 - Yep, yep. 49:31 For a lot of these things, again, it's very, like if you're a Python developer, 49:34 a lot of these concepts are gonna be very much familiar to you. 49:36 - Yeah, I think one of the challenges people have often is like structured data versus like I got an LLM answer 49:43 and it's a little different every time and they upgrade the model from 5.1 to 5.15 49:50 and now it does something totally different. 49:52 Like how do I code against this, right? 49:54 And so using structured data can be a big bonus, right? 49:58 - Yeah. 49:58 - Okay, super cool. 50:00 Let's see prompts. Now it's starting to sound AI like. 50:03 Yeah. So this is basically like the description says prompts are reusable templates that help 50:08 elements interact with your server effectively. If you have a server that does, I don't know, 50:13 cooking recipes, it might provide prompts for like, what is a like, what are the steps for a recipe 50:19 and with substitutions where needed. So it allows you to basically pre cook prompts that your server 50:24 might be using. Okay, they might be passing these internally to? Yes, yeah. So 50:30 return to the host AI, you know, there's a lot of AIs involved here. 50:34 Right, you know, essentially like, you're exposing prompt templates, like that's what it is, 50:38 like, and saying like, oh, if you're a user, if you're looking for like, creating a recipe, 50:42 this is a template for that prompt for a recipe. 50:44 Okay, cool. There's also a little bit of a UI component, which is interesting, 50:48 you can have a iconography representation of your actions. 50:53 Yeah, this is relatively new. But basically, for some of them, like, 50:56 bake in some of the icons to just make it easier to differentiate between different actions. Because 51:00 especially again, like different servers can have different tools and there are many tools. And how 51:04 do you like just parse the strings? Like just look at iconography. Yeah. Another thing that it has 51:09 built in support for is working with images. So that's pretty wild. I yeah, I noticed that for a 51:15 lot of the stuff, it's also like it's baked into the these are not necessarily like MCP spec constructs. 51:19 This is more like how the Python SDK exposes them and allows you to operate on them, right? 51:23 because like the fundamental constructs, the primitives are we have tools, 51:27 we have prompts, there is resources, which is another one. 51:30 And the resources is, allows the LM to basically think of it 51:34 as how do you refer to databases or files or entities within an API? 51:41 Those are, there's also elicitations as what Michael is showing right now on the screen. 51:45 So we have elicitations is a way for an MCP server to go to the client 51:49 and say, I want the client to provide me structured input on a specific question. 51:54 Like, hey, can you give us your date of birth? 51:58 And I expect a date. 52:00 Can you give me a date back exactly so I don't need to guess from the LLM context, right? 52:04 Or it can say like, you know, what kind of pet do you have? 52:07 And it can give you a list of options that you can actually have to pick from. 52:11 It's like, oh, dog, you know, pet, reptile, like dog, cat, reptile, whatever. 52:15 It allows you to have that structured controlled input that it's not just you're typing into the chat box, 52:21 but you're selecting from a list that the server asks you to. 52:25 So that's another neat thing that recently got added. 52:27 Yeah, that looks quite interesting. 52:29 And it has to do a little bit with the WebSocket type of exchange as well, right? 52:34 Not exactly, but it's going along. 52:37 You've asked it something. 52:38 While it's working on that, it's come back and it's asking you to give it more information to carry on. 52:42 Yes, exactly. 52:43 In that sense, right? 52:45 Yep, yep. 52:45 So could this be, I've worked on your request. 52:49 I've used the database MCP or whatever, and I've learned that there's 20 records. 52:54 Do you want to delete them like you asked or do you not want to delete them? 52:57 Yes, yes, exactly that. 52:58 Or it can say, hey, I found like 10 conflicting records. 53:02 Which ones do I need to delete? 53:03 And then you can help and basically do, yeah, right? 53:05 So it asks for structured input so that you don't have to have it guess from whatever you type in the chat. 53:11 Because if you type in the chat, it's like it's non-deterministic, right? 53:14 It could say, oh, delete all the records with the name John Doe. 53:18 And then it's like, oh, I'll delete everything with dough. 53:20 Because somehow, like, that sort of decides, like, oh, no, no, no. 53:23 Jane, come back. 53:24 Yeah. 53:26 So it adds a little bit more structure. 53:28 Yeah, got it. 53:29 And the programming model is super smooth here. 53:32 They did a great job. 53:33 So, for example, you might be doing this elicitation within a tool call. 53:39 And that's an async function, async web function. 53:41 And the way you do it is just await context that elicit some message and schema. 53:46 And then when the person responds, the async thing resumes and off you go, right? 53:51 There's not some nested callbacks and all that kind of business. 53:54 That's a very smooth developer experience. 53:56 I love it. 53:57 Yeah, it definitely is. 53:58 Okay, I do want to talk about some of the popular ones out there 54:04 through an awesome list because I'm just a sucker for awesome, awesome list. 54:08 But is there anything else that I feel that you feel like we should be covering here 54:12 on the SDK? 54:14 Yeah, there's a lot of great work done Python SDK and the FastMCP folks, 54:18 I would say like go through the repo. 54:21 It's getup.com slash model context protocol slash Python dash SDK. 54:26 Go there. 54:27 There's some great samples to get you started. 54:29 And again, we're always open to feedback. 54:31 So if something's like, oh, this was too confusing. 54:33 I didn't understand. 54:34 The team is very receptive to feedback. 54:36 So please let them know. 54:37 Yeah. 54:38 143 contributors. 54:40 Last release five days ago. 54:42 Bunch of PRs, right? 54:44 It looks like it's pretty open. 54:45 You know, Yeah. Oh, yeah. 54:46 Close PRs pretty open to people working. 54:49 Also, it looks kind of very beginner friendly in the sense that the issues are 54:55 tagged with lots of lots of stuff that you could search for, like needs motivation. 55:00 You know, you could go through and come up with some examples and help, even if 55:03 you're not an expert in the SDK, for example. 55:05 Absolutely. 55:06 And there's also, I believe the Python might be using the good first issue too. 55:10 So if you're, if you're a new contributor, you've never looked at it. 55:12 It's like, I like, don't be intimidated. 55:14 There's plenty of- 55:15 Good first issue. 55:16 Good first issue. 55:17 Like there's plenty of things that you can just drop in and see like, oh, I can help with that. 55:21 Yeah, love it. 55:22 Okay. 55:23 You too can be an AI developer. 55:24 I love it. 55:24 Now let's talk about awesome MCP servers. 55:27 Awesome MCP servers. 55:29 This comes to us from the very well-known PunkPi. 55:33 The person behind Glamour.ai. 55:36 Yeah, awesome. 55:37 And 72,000 GitHub stars, no joke. 55:41 So there may be a fad, but maybe people will stick around. 55:43 So this actually has support for a lot of different languages 55:47 and it's got scopes like is this cloud or local or embedded 55:50 and so on. 55:51 But then you scroll down. 55:53 Look at the list. 55:54 Massive. 55:55 The list is, I mean, look at the scroll bar. 55:58 It is massive. 55:59 Yeah, we keep scrolling and scrolling. 56:01 I don't know. 56:02 If I page down full speed and just pin page down, the pinch down button, it's something along the lines of like 56:09 five seconds just to get through the list. 56:11 And these are one per line. 56:12 Mm-hmm. 56:13 You know, it starts out as one should when they're building awesome lists with categories, right? 56:19 Command line, cloud platforms, biology medicine, and bioinformatics. 56:26 There's one for everything. 56:27 I know. 56:28 You want to just jump around a bit and we can see what's here when we riff on it? 56:31 Gaming. 56:32 MCP server for Unity 3D game engine integration for game to own. 56:36 That's kind of cool. 56:37 Go. 56:38 Unity MCP. 56:38 MCP chess. 56:40 An MCP server playing chess against LLMs. 56:42 Do you ever think of like, can I beat an LLM at chess? 56:46 And you want to like just get an MCP server to do that? 56:48 There is one for that. 56:49 I'm starting to feel like it's better to do the local models 56:51 for the chess playing against the one. 56:54 I don't want the really smart ones. 56:56 There's also chess MCP, which is, this is interesting. 56:59 It's not the same as the other one. 57:01 This is access your chess.com player data and records and other public info. 57:06 Yep. 57:06 Right. 57:07 That's kind of cool. 57:08 So if you wanted to say, hey, I'm building something and I would like access to sort of the Kaggle of chess players type of thing, right? 57:15 Like the list of competitive chess results. 57:18 Yeah. 57:18 That's kind of cool. 57:19 Yeah. 57:19 Yeah. 57:20 Yeah. 57:20 I personally have built one for Halo. 57:23 I'm a big fan of Halo, the video game. 57:24 Oh, yeah. 57:25 It's not on the list, which now I need to go and contribute to that list. 57:28 Let's do a PR. 57:30 Like, that's the thing that I have is basically analyze my Halo stats. 57:34 And I'll tell you what, the LLMs are getting really good at analyzing the stats. 57:38 You give them the data, they can make some conclusions. 57:40 Yeah, I bet. Let's just keep it really crazy. Let's do, I was going to do delivery. We'll do that in a moment. Marketing. 57:46 Marketing. Yeah. 57:48 Yeah. So I guess one of the things that looks, I'm after just a very quick first impression, like you're running ads on someone's platform or you're doing marketing on someone's platform, but you want visibility into how that's going. 58:00 So we've got the Facebook ads and PC server. 58:03 We've got the Google ads, MCP server, Amazon ads and so on. 58:07 Right. 58:08 But what else is, yeah, that sounds about like most of it there, I suppose. 58:11 But think of it this way. 58:12 Like if you connect several of these MCP servers to your client and then you connect them 58:17 to all your ads accounts and then say, how are my ads performing 58:20 and which ones of them are the best this past week? 58:23 Right. 58:23 Like I don't need to click around dashboards and figure out like the filters and everything. 58:26 Just ask the LLM, pull the data, make a conclusion. 58:29 Now, you still need to verify the conclusion that make sure it's not hallucinating things. 58:32 But nonetheless, it's kind of cool. 58:34 Yeah, it's very cool. 58:36 So one thing I know I realized now that we skipped over the Python SDK is we talked all 58:40 about the server. 58:41 What about client things? 58:42 If I wanted to create an MCP server that is effectively the composition of some other 58:48 MCP servers, could I do that? 58:49 You absolutely can. 58:51 Nothing stops you. 58:51 Like an MCP server can also act as an MCP client and then connect to other MCP servers. 58:57 Like there's no restriction to that, right? 58:59 Like it's basically, it's very composable. 59:01 And a client for all intents and purposes is basically an entity that can connect to an MCP server, 59:07 which can also be an MCP server. 59:08 It's kind of circular. 59:09 Yeah, yeah. 59:10 It's turtles all the way down, but MCP this time. 59:12 Yeah, it's AI turtles this time. 59:14 So delivery, we just have the DoorDash delivery MCP server. 59:17 Oh man, like who? 59:19 Claude, why is my food not here? 59:22 Have you ever seen those fail videos or whatever? 59:25 I watch weird YouTube stuff with my daughter sometimes and you'll see like cops delivering DoorDash. 59:31 I'm gonna say, sorry, we had to arrest your DoorDash delivery, 59:33 but we were pretty close. 59:34 So we thought we'd just go and deliver your food anyway. 59:36 I mean, I don't know what the server is gonna say, but it could say anything, you know? 59:40 - The police are on their way. 59:42 - Yeah. 59:42 People are generally really appreciative. 59:44 Like, well, thanks for getting me my dinner anyway. 59:47 Let's see what else is out here. 59:49 Got text to speech, which is interesting. 59:52 - Sports. 59:52 - Sports, hell yeah. 59:54 Oh, look at this, Strava. 59:55 Like if you're running or biking, you can use this also to analyze your data. 59:59 There's a lot of MCB servers for data analysis, which is kind of cool. 01:00:02 Okay, I don't even, this one, this is the one that appeals to me. 01:00:05 So Multivewer, this is actually not a thing that I would want, but I think it's interesting. 01:00:11 So Multivewer is a motorsports desktop client. 01:00:14 And what I think it does, it does for IndyCar, WAC, Formula One, 01:00:18 and even like the feeder classes. 01:00:20 I think what it lets you do is put up both an overlay of telemetry onto watching the live stream, 01:00:27 but also put the multiple people up in live streams at the same time or 01:00:32 something like that. 01:00:32 Right. 01:00:33 That's kind of cool. 01:00:34 That's cool. 01:00:35 So the, the reason I don't really like that is I don't watch any of those sports 01:00:38 live. 01:00:39 I record them. 01:00:39 And so I can then pause it and then skip the commercials. 01:00:42 And so this is like for a live stream sort of deal, but the MCP server, 01:00:46 it controls multi viewer for that. 01:00:49 So maybe you could set up an AI that is watching what's going on and switches the views around in the multi-viewer for you. 01:00:58 That's wild. 01:00:58 Or swaps to the most interesting telemetry at the specific moment. 01:01:02 Yeah, listen to the radio. 01:01:03 They start getting all frantic. 01:01:05 Like, all right, we're switching to that view. 01:01:08 Yeah, there's an NCC server for everything. 01:01:10 Like, this list is massive. 01:01:12 I'm actually like, every time I discover these things, like, we're looking at this right now, I was like, oh, I didn't know there was one for multi-viewer. 01:01:17 Like I didn't know what multiviewer is until we talked right now. 01:01:20 Yeah, but wouldn't that be a cool demo? 01:01:22 Yeah. 01:01:22 You know, at a conference, you're like, I know you've all seen the tic-tac-toe one, 01:01:27 but let me show you the final of F1. 01:01:30 Yeah, yeah, yeah. 01:01:30 Or something, right? 01:01:32 Very astute observation, because again, like there's a lot of these like hello world kind 01:01:35 of things like, oh, look, it's kind of neat. 01:01:36 It responded with a thing like, give me a real thing. 01:01:38 This is that real thing. 01:01:39 Yeah, yeah, that's, that's super neat. 01:01:41 All right. 01:01:42 I guess we've got the support one that Lassie and Jira quick chat. 01:01:46 It's whatever you want, right? 01:01:47 That's the one to reduce your boring work. 01:01:49 The GRI MCP server. 01:01:50 Like, you don't want to triage your bugs. 01:01:52 Just let the LLM do it for you. 01:01:53 Hey, can you go and find the things that are most important for me to work on today? 01:01:56 Give me the bug numbers. 01:01:58 Yeah. 01:01:58 Or if you see somebody assign a bug to me, close it. 01:02:01 Yeah. 01:02:01 Yeah, exactly. 01:02:02 Query all the bugs assigned to me, reassign them to somebody else. 01:02:09 Yeah, crazy. 01:02:10 Exactly. 01:02:11 Not a good fit for this person. 01:02:13 Yeah. 01:02:13 No, exactly. 01:02:14 These are the life hacks you learned only from this podcast. 01:02:17 That's right. 01:02:18 It's like, if it involves MCP servers and cool stuff I can code, give it to me. 01:02:22 Otherwise, send it somewhere else. 01:02:24 Send it somewhere else. 01:02:26 All right, Dan. 01:02:27 I think we're getting pretty close on time here in terms of what we got time to cover. 01:02:31 But this is super fun. 01:02:33 Maybe close things out for folks. 01:02:35 They want to get started with MCP servers, either building them, consuming them, building 01:02:39 and consuming them, plugging them into their tool chain. 01:02:43 What do you tell them? 01:02:43 Yeah. 01:02:44 So for folks that wanna build modelcontextprotocol.io, as simple as it gets, go there. 01:02:48 It has guides, tutorials, SDK starters, everything is there. 01:02:52 If you are a consumer of the MCPs and you wanna, hey, I wanna do this like awesome thing with MC servers. 01:02:58 First of all, the GitHub MCP registry that we showed earlier is one of those things 01:03:03 is github.com/mcp, go explore. 01:03:06 And then of course on GitHub, there's plenty of servers that are tagged with MCP. 01:03:10 You can also take a look there. 01:03:11 And there's other registries that also index MCP servers of all sorts, like Glama AI from 01:03:17 Punk Pie that we talked about before. 01:03:19 There's one such registry that you can also look at and see if there's anything that's 01:03:22 of interest. 01:03:24 I will say that as you are exploring MCP servers, exercise caution, just like you would exercise 01:03:30 with any other software and APIs and websites where you log in because the responsibility 01:03:36 is kind of on you to figure out what's safe, what's not. 01:03:40 If you have an MCP server that's like, oh, it's going to read all my iMessages and sort them by importance. 01:03:45 I'm like, yes. 01:03:47 And do you know who built that and where your messages are going? 01:03:50 So be careful. 01:03:51 Are they also scanning for credit card numbers? 01:03:53 Exactly. 01:03:54 Why not? 01:03:55 You messaged somebody with your social security number the other day. 01:03:57 Nice. 01:03:59 Yeah. 01:03:59 So be careful with those. 01:04:00 But I'd say, like, explore them. 01:04:01 And then we are working on formalizing discovery a bit better. 01:04:06 your clients like VS Code and Cursor and Cloud Desktop are going to become better and better 01:04:11 with more discoverability affordances. Awesome. All right. Thank you so much for coming on the 01:04:14 show. I learned a ton. I'm sure listeners did as well. And it was a lot of fun. Thank you for 01:04:19 having me. Yeah. See you later. Bye. This has been another episode of Talk Python To Me. 01:04:24 Thank you to our sponsors. Be sure to check out what they're offering. It really helps support 01:04:28 the show. This episode is sponsored by Posit Connect from the makers of Shiny. Publish, 01:04:34 share and deploy all of your data projects that you're creating using Python. Streamlit, Dash, 01:04:40 Shiny, Bokeh, FastAPI, Flask, Quarto, Reports, Dashboards, and APIs. Posit Connect supports all 01:04:47 of them. Try Posit Connect for free by going to talkpython.fm/Posit, P-O-S-I-T. 01:04:54 And it's brought to you by Nordstellar. Nordstellar is a threat exposure management platform 01:04:59 from the Nord security family, the folks behind NordVPN that combines dark web intelligence, 01:05:05 session hijacking prevention, brand and domain abuse detection, and external attack surface 01:05:11 management. Learn more and get started keeping your team safe at talkpython.fm/nordstellar. 01:05:18 If you or your team needs to learn Python, we have over 270 hours of beginner and advanced courses 01:05:24 on topics ranging from complete beginners to async code, Flask, Django, HTML, and even LLMs. 01:05:31 best of all there's not a subscription in sight browse the catalog at talkpython.fm 01:05:36 be sure to subscribe to the show open your favorite podcast player app search for python we should be 01:05:41 right at the top if you enjoy the geeky rap theme song you can download the full track the link is 01:05:46 your podcast player show notes this is your host michael kennedy thank you so much for listening i 01:05:51 really appreciate it now get out there and write some python code 01:06:06 I'm out. Copyright © PDX Web Properties, LLC 2015-2026. All Rights Reserved Made with in Portland, OR, USA

Certains moteurs de recherche ignorent purement et simplement le JavaScript mal optimisé, alors qu’un simple ajustement HTML peut changer le classement d’une page du tout au tout. Pourtant, des frameworks comme React dominent désormais de nombreux sites à fort trafic, malgré des défis persistants en matière d’indexation.Selon les dernières recommandations de Google, la structure du code source prime souvent sur la seule qualité du contenu. La compatibilité entre langages de programmation et robots d’indexation s’invite ainsi au cœur des stratégies SEO, avec des conséquences directes sur la visibilité organique. Le choix du langage de codage pèse lourd dans le dialogue entre vos pages web et les moteurs de recherche. Google, Bing ou Qwant accordent la priorité à la lisibilité du contenu et à la rapidité d’accès à l’information. Sur ce terrain, le HTML s’impose : il structure le site, trace des repères clairs, guide sans complexité les robots qui sillonnent le web. A découvrir également : Largeur idéale pour votre site web : comment la choisir ? JavaScript met l’accent sur l’expérience utilisateur et l’interactivité. Mais dès que trop de fonctionnalités lui sont confiées côté client, les robots d’indexation peuvent perdre leur chemin. Si le contenu apparaît trop tard ou se trouve masqué, la visibilité chute. Grandir sur le web grâce à une portion de Python côté serveur séduit de plus en plus pour générer du contenu pertinent, mais tout passe par une restitution HTML impeccable. À chaque technologie, son domaine de prédilection : A lire en complément : Zectayaznindus, miroir du web moderne : ce que ce mot révèle sur Google Savoir manier ces langages affine la présentation de l’information, favorise l’accessibilité et ouvre la porte à une indexation rapide. Pour viser haut, impossible d’ignorer les standards imposés par les moteurs, sans jamais oublier la fluidité de navigation. Atteindre les meilleures positions sur Google demande une combinaison pointue de technologies. Le socle reste le HTML : bien structuré, pensé pour guider robots et utilisateurs. Sans lui, les contenus même les plus inspirés passent à côté de leur public. JavaScript, quand il orchestre les animations et personnalise les applications web, devient un atout décisif. Mais il impose sa rigueur : si le contenu s’affiche trop tard, faute d’un bon rendu côté serveur, l’indexation s’en retrouve freinée. Miser sur le server-side rendering aide à contourner ces obstacles, offrant au robot tout ce qu’il est venu chercher. Python a pris sa place dans l’arsenal SEO : génération dynamique de pages, analyses en profondeur, gestion automatisée de la data. Il se glisse derrière chaque stratégie de contenu adaptée au marketing digital, tout comme PHP ou Java qui, moins médiatisés, gardent leurs fonctions clés dans les architectures solides. Pour y voir plus clair, voici une synthèse des forces de chaque langage : À chaque type de projet, s’assurer que le langage retenu communique efficacement avec les moteurs de recherche, qu’il hiérarchise clairement l’info et repousse les freins à l’accès instantané au contenu. La structure du code oriente directement la manière dont les moteurs classent et comprennent un site. Savoir dompter les balises HTML reste le socle d’un référencement solide. Balises meta, titres structurés, attributs alt judicieusement choisis : chaque détail compte quand il s’agit d’expliquer à un robot, ou à une personne en situation de handicap, ce que propose chaque page. L’enchaînement des balises, bien pensé, lisible et organisé, n’a rien d’accessoire. Un texte clarifié par son codage gagne en indexabilité. Sur de nombreux sites, cette exigence de clarté fait la différence. Il suffit parfois d’une structure soignée pour franchir une marche dans les résultats de recherche. Voici quelques principes techniques à intégrer pour renforcer la présence sur Google : Certains CMS proposent des automatismes sur la structuration, mais la main de l’humain demeure précieuse pour ajuster la finesse des balises. Un contenu repensé pour tous les utilisateurs, peaufiné côté technique, trace sa route vers de meilleures positions. La marche rapide du référencement naturel s’accélère, portée par l’irruption de l’intelligence artificielle et la prise en compte des comportements réels. En 2025, chaque adaptation à de nouveaux algorithmes peut signifier plusieurs places gagnées. Les robots des moteurs de recherche privilégient les sites qui assurent une expérience mobile irréprochable, une organisation des contenus limpide et des réponses précises aux besoins utilisateurs. Les mutations s’opèrent autour de trois axes principaux : Collecter, analyser, affiner : aujourd’hui, Python ou JavaScript associés à une analyse fine de l’audience donnent le rythme. Savoir anticiper les attentes, garantir une rapidité d’affichage et rester fidèle à l’intention de recherche forment le vrai terrain de la visibilité future. Ceux qui garderont la main sur la technique et l’agilité sur les usages se donneront toujours une longueur d’avance. Recherche Articles en vogue © 2025 | tic-et-net.org Sign in to your account Identifiant ou adresse e-mail Mot de passe Se souvenir de moi

Geeky Gadgets The Latest Technology News 11:15 am December 15, 2025 By Julian Horsey What if your Raspberry Pi could do more than you ever imagined, like powering a humanoid robot, automating your home, or running advanced AI models? With the launch of the SunFounder Fusion HAT+, that vision is now within reach. This innovative expansion board is engineered to transform your Raspberry Pi into a powerhouse of innovation, offering seamless compatibility with models ranging from the latest Raspberry Pi 5 to the compact Zero 2W. Whether you’re a curious beginner or a seasoned developer, the Fusion HAT+ promises to unlock new possibilities in robotics, AI, and smart systems, all at an accessible price point. In this overview, we’ll explore how the Fusion HAT+ stands out with its advanced hardware features and support for leading AI platforms like OpenAI and Gemini AI. From precise motor control to built-in audio capabilities, this board is designed to handle complex, real-world challenges. You’ll discover how it enables creators to build everything from autonomous vehicles to voice-controlled assistants, all while making sure reliable power management and ease of use. If you’ve ever dreamed of pushing the boundaries of what your Raspberry Pi can achieve, this might just be the upgrade you’ve been waiting for. TL;DR Key Takeaways : SunFounder has introduced the Fusion HAT+, a highly versatile expansion board designed to elevate Raspberry Pi projects to new heights. This innovative board is compatible with a wide range of Raspberry Pi models, including the latest Raspberry Pi 5, as well as earlier versions like the Raspberry Pi 4, 3B+, and Zero 2W. With its robust features and broad compatibility, the Fusion HAT+ is ideal for applications in robotics, home automation, and artificial intelligence (AI). Whether you are a beginner or an experienced developer, this expansion board provides a powerful platform to bring your creative ideas to life. The Fusion HAT+ is designed to integrate effortlessly with multiple Raspberry Pi models, making sure flexibility for users with different setups. Its compatibility extends to the Raspberry Pi 5, 4, 3B+, and Zero 2W, making it a practical choice for both new and existing Raspberry Pi users. Beyond hardware, the Fusion HAT+ supports leading Large Language Models (LLMs) such as OpenAI, Gemini AI, and DeepSeek AI. This capability allows developers to incorporate advanced AI functionalities into their projects, allowing innovations in voice recognition, machine learning, and intelligent automation. The Fusion HAT+ is equipped with a range of advanced hardware features that make it suitable for diverse applications. These include: These features provide the foundation for building intricate systems, from robotic arms to AI-powered devices, offering users the tools they need to tackle complex challenges. The Fusion HAT+ is tailored to meet the demands of modern robotics and smart systems, making it an excellent choice for developers aiming to create innovative projects. Its capabilities enable the development of: With its compatibility with AI platforms and robust hardware, the Fusion HAT+ enables users to explore innovative solutions in robotics and automation. Power stability is a critical factor in any project, and the Fusion HAT+ addresses this with a well-designed power management system. It includes a rechargeable 7.4V, 14.8Wh battery and USB Type-C charging for convenience. Additional features such as power protection mechanisms, battery level indicators, and a safe shutdown button ensure uninterrupted operation and safeguard your hardware from potential damage. These features make the Fusion HAT+ a reliable choice for long-term and demanding projects. To simplify the integration process, the Fusion HAT+ comes with detailed documentation and step-by-step tutorials. These resources cover both hardware and software aspects, making it easier for users to incorporate the board into their projects. Python libraries are provided to assist seamless interaction with AI platforms, and users can access technical support through active maker community forums and troubleshooting guides. This comprehensive support ensures that users of all skill levels can maximize the potential of the Fusion HAT+. The Fusion HAT+ is designed to cater to a wide audience, from beginners exploring the basics of robotics to seasoned engineers working on advanced AI systems. Its user-friendly design and extensive support make it accessible to individuals aged 10 and above, including educators, hobbyists, and professionals. Priced at just £26.17 GBP, the Fusion HAT+ offers exceptional value for its extensive features and compatibility. This affordability makes it an attractive option for anyone looking to expand their Raspberry Pi’s capabilities without breaking the budget. The SunFounder Fusion HAT+ is a feature-rich expansion board that enables Raspberry Pi enthusiasts to push the boundaries of their projects. With advanced hardware, seamless AI integration, and robust support, it is well-suited for applications in robotics, home automation, and beyond. Whether you are building a smart car, a robotic arm, or an AI-powered assistant, the Fusion HAT+ provides the tools and resources to turn your ideas into reality. Its combination of affordability, versatility, and innovative features makes it an indispensable addition to any Raspberry Pi toolkit. Source: SunFounder Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

A monthly overview of things you need to know as an architect or aspiring architect. View an example We protect your privacy. QCon San Francisco (Nov 16-20): What's next in AI? What's next in software? Learn from the teams already doing it. Register Now Facilitating the Spread of Knowledge and Innovation in Professional Software Development Unlock the full InfoQ experience by logging in! Stay updated with your favorite authors and topics, engage with content, and download exclusive resources. Soroosh Khodami discusses why we aren't ready for the next Log4Shell. He shares live demos of dependency confusion and compromised builds, explaining how minor oversights gift hackers total system access. He explains the value of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), dependency firewalls, and shifting security left to build resilient DevSecOps cultures that protect the modern software supply chain. Andrew Harmel-Law and a panel of expert architects discuss the shifting practice of architecture in 2025. They explain strategies for communicating technical debt to stakeholders, the benefits of decentralized decision-making through ADRs, and the career paths of modern leaders. The panel shares insights on bridging the gap between mobile and backend teams to ensure a holistic system. In this episode, Thomas Betts and Adi Polak talk about the need for context engineering when interacting with LLMs and designing agentic systems. Prompt engineering techniques work with a stateless approach, while context engineering allows AI systems to be stateful. How can you focus in a sea of results from a large regression test suite? This article describes a stochastic approach that relies on some degree of redundancy in your CI regression test set. This approach does not guarantee you will catch every bug every time, but it gives you your best bet of not missing the subtle signatures of all the bugs uncovered by your CI regression test suite runs. Franka Passing discusses the architectural shift of Duolingo’s 500+ backend services to Kubernetes. She explains the move toward GitOps with Argo CD, the transition to IPv6-only pods, and the "cellular architecture" used to isolate environments. She shares "reports from the trenches" on managing developer trust, navigating AWS rate limits, and productionizing early adopter services. Join Luca Mezzalira for this 5-week online cohort. Master socio-technical architecture leadership. Register Now. Learn how leading engineering teams run AI in production—reliably, securely, and at scale. Early Bird ends April 14. Learn what's next in AI and software, from teams already doing it. Early Bird ends April 14. InfoQ Homepage News AWS Launches Strands Labs for Experimental AI Agent Projects Mar 12, 2026 2 min read by Daniel Dominguez Amazon Web Services has introduced Strands Labs, a new GitHub organization created to host experimental projects related to agent-based AI development. The initiative is linked to the Strands Agents SDK, an open-source toolkit that allows developers to build AI agents using Python or TypeScript. Strands Labs includes three projects: Robots, Robots Sim, and AI Functions. Each project explores different aspects of agent development, ranging from robotics integration to code generation workflows. The Strands Robots project focuses on connecting AI agents with physical hardware. It provides a unified interface that allows agents built with the Strands framework to interact with sensors and robotic devices. In demonstration examples, AWS shows an agent controlling an SO-101 robotic arm using the NVIDIA GR00T model. GR00T is a vision-language-action (VLA) model that takes camera images, robot joint positions, and language instructions as input and generates joint actions as output. The Robots project also integrates with LeRobot, an open framework designed to simplify interaction with robotics hardware and datasets. By combining LeRobot abstractions with VLA models, developers can build agents that process visual data, interpret instructions, and perform physical actions. The Strands Robots Sim project provides a simulation environment for robotics experimentation. Instead of using physical hardware, developers can run agents inside physics-based environments that simulate robot behavior. The system supports environments from the Libero robotics benchmark and can integrate VLA policies through an inference service. The simulator collects observations from cameras and robot joints and feeds them to policy models that produce motor commands. The environment can record simulation runs as video and supports iterative control loops for debugging or experimentation. The third project, AI Functions, explores a different approach to writing software with AI agents. Instead of implementing a function directly, developers define the intended behavior using natural language descriptions and validation conditions written in Python. A decorator called @ai_function triggers the Strands agent loop, which generates code to satisfy the specification and validates the result using pre- and post-conditions. If the validation fails, the system retries automatically. The framework can generate implementations that parse files, perform data transformations, or execute other tasks while returning standard Python objects such as Pandas DataFrames. Community reactions to the announcement have focused on the robotics integration and the experimental nature of the projects. Clare Liguori, senior principal engineer at AWS posted on X: I think of Strands Labs as a playground for the next generation of ideas for AI agent development, from how to build agentic robots to how to make our everyday applications more agentic. Others highlighted the AI Functions experiment as an example of a growing interest in specification-driven programming, where developers define behavior and validation rules while agents generate the underlying code. Design engineer John Hanacek shared: Robots animated by agentic frameworks alongside humans, sharing a perception and awareness layer to coordinate actions. AWS stated that Strands Labs will continue to expand with additional experiments contributed by different Amazon teams. The organization is intended to function as a testing ground for ideas related to agent orchestration, robotics integration, and agent-assisted software development before they potentially move into the core Strands SDK. Presented by: Karthik Ranganathan - Co-CEO & Co-Founder at YugabyteDB, and Aditi Gupta - Snr. GenAI/ML Specialist Solutions Architect Save your seat A round-up of last week’s content on InfoQ sent out every Tuesday. Join a community of over 250,000 senior developers. View an example We protect your privacy. A round-up of last week’s content on InfoQ sent out every Tuesday. Join a community of over 250,000 senior developers. View an example We protect your privacy. Reliability rules have changed. At QCon London 2026, unlearn legacy patterns and get the blueprints from senior engineers scaling production AI today. Join senior peers from high-scale orgs as they share how they are: InfoQ.com and all content copyright © 2006-2026 C4Media Inc. Privacy Notice, Terms And Conditions, Cookie Policy

From daily news and career tips to monthly insights on AI, sustainability, Aerospace, and more—pick what matters and get it in your inbox. Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation. Engineering-inspired textiles, mugs, hats, and thoughtful gifts We connect top engineering talent with the world's most innovative companies. We empower professionals with advanced engineering and tech education to grow careers. We recognize outstanding achievements in engineering, innovation, and technology. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. Follow Us On Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation. Engineering-inspired textiles, mugs, hats, and thoughtful gifts We connect top engineering talent with the world's most innovative companies We empower professionals with advanced engineering and tech education to grow careers. We recognize outstanding achievements in engineering, innovation, and technology. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. Chinese humanoid robots may soon rival or surpass human sprinting speeds. Chinese humanoid robots are rapidly advancing toward a milestone once reserved for elite human athletes: surpassing world-record sprint speeds. According to Wang Xingxing, founder of robotics firm Unitree Robotics, humanoid machines could soon outpace Olympic champion Usain Bolt in the 100-meter dash—a prospect that signals both technological progress and the growing ambition within embodied AI. Speaking at the Yabuli China Entrepreneurs Forum on Tuesday, Wang noted that while robots still trail humans in sprinting performance today, the gap is narrowing quickly. With improvements in mechanical design, control systems, and AI-driven coordination, researchers are beginning to push humanoid robots into performance territories that were once thought to be uniquely human. Recent developments highlight how close robots are getting to elite athletic benchmarks. In February, Zhejiang University and Shanghai-based JingShi Technology unveiled a full-size humanoid robot named “Bolt,” capable of reaching a peak running speed of 10 meters per second. The team described it as the fastest full-size running humanoid robot built to date. For context, Usain Bolt’s world-record 100-meter sprint of 9.58 seconds translates to an average speed of roughly 10.44 meters per second, with peak speeds slightly higher during the race. “In a few months, by around mid-year, humanoid robots globally — especially in China — may run faster than humans,” Wang said. “Their 100-meter sprint times could drop below 10 seconds,” he continued. While humanoid robots have not yet exceeded this threshold in real-world conditions, the margin is becoming increasingly narrow. If robots were to consistently achieve or surpass these speeds, it would represent more than just a technical achievement, it would mark a symbolic shift in how machines compare to human physical capabilities, particularly in dynamic and high-performance tasks like sprinting. Achieving high-speed locomotion in humanoid robots is far more complex than simply increasing motor power. Engineers are solving challenges related to balance, coordination, energy efficiency, and real-time decision-making. Unlike wheeled or quadruped robots, humanoids need to replicate the inherently unstable process of bipedal running. This involves precise synchronization between sensors, actuators, and control algorithms to maintain stability at high speeds. Even minor errors in timing or force distribution can lead to falls or inefficient movement. Despite these gains, Wang emphasized that the industry is still far from achieving a breakthrough comparable to generative AI systems like ChatGPT. The primary limitation lies in generalization, the ability of robots to perform reliably across diverse, unpredictable environments. While humanoid robots can achieve near-perfect performance in controlled or pre-trained settings, their capabilities often degrade when conditions change. Variations in terrain, obstacles, or external disturbances can significantly impact performance, making real-world deployment challenging. This gap highlights a broader issue in embodied AI: translating controlled, lab-based success into robust, adaptable real-world functionality. As development continues, the race between humans and machines may soon extend beyond symbolic comparisons. Whether robots ultimately surpass human sprinters or not, their rapid progress underscores a larger transformation, one where physical intelligence is becoming as critical as digital intelligence in the evolution of AI. Atharva is a full-time content writer with a post-graduate degree in media & amp; entertainment and a graduate degree in electronics & telecommunications. He has written in the sports and technology domains respectively. In his leisure time, Atharva loves learning about digital marketing and watching soccer matches. His main goal behind joining Interesting Engineering is to learn more about how the recent technological advancements are helping human beings on both societal and individual levels in their daily lives. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Premium Follow

Humanoid robots emerged as one of the most talked about technologies at a major Silicon Valley summit this week, signaling how quickly machines designed to move and interact like humans are moving from experimental labs into real world applications. At the event, technology companies, robotics startups, and artificial intelligence researchers demonstrated humanoid robots capable of walking, grasping objects, responding to voice commands, and navigating complex environments. These demonstrations underscored how advances in AI models, sensors, and mechanical design are converging to accelerate the development of robots that can operate in spaces built for people. Industry leaders at the summit said humanoid robots represent a critical next step in automation. Unlike traditional industrial robots that work in controlled factory settings, humanoid robots are designed to function in homes, hospitals, warehouses, and offices without requiring major infrastructure changes. This flexibility could make them suitable for tasks ranging from elder care and logistics to manufacturing support and disaster response. Several speakers highlighted how recent progress in large language models and computer vision has dramatically improved robots’ ability to understand instructions and adapt to unfamiliar situations. Instead of following rigid programming, newer humanoid systems can learn from observation, interpret spoken language, and make decisions in real time. Researchers noted that this shift brings robots closer to being general purpose assistants rather than single task machines. However, experts at the summit also acknowledged significant challenges ahead. Power efficiency, safety, affordability, and reliability remain major hurdles before humanoid robots can be deployed at scale. There are also ongoing debates about ethical considerations, workforce displacement, and how societies should regulate machines that closely mimic human behavior. As AI systems become more capable, companies are increasingly looking to give intelligence a physical form. While widespread adoption may still be years away, the momentum on display suggests humanoid robots are no longer a distant concept but an emerging reality that could reshape how humans work and live. Abdul Wasay explores emerging trends across AI, cybersecurity, startups and social media platforms in a way anyone can easily follow. Apple approves a driver that enables Nvidia eGPUs on Arm Macs, marking a shift in GPU support for Apple Silicon devices. A major EU data breach exposed emails, user data, and internal records after hackers accessed cloud systems and leaked files online. Large-scale theft has hit the Sukkur to Multan section of the M5 Motorway, where multiple high-tech surveillance and speed cameras have gone missing across nearly. China has officially moved up the delivery timeline of its J-35 stealth fighters to Pakistan. Initially set for late 2026, the advanced aircraft will now. Premier Pakistan technology news website with special focus on startups, entrepreneurship and consumer products. © 2026 TechJuice.PK – All rights reserved.

From daily news and career tips to monthly insights on AI, sustainability, Aerospace, and more—pick what matters and get it in your inbox. Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation. Engineering-inspired textiles, mugs, hats, and thoughtful gifts We connect top engineering talent with the world's most innovative companies. We empower professionals with advanced engineering and tech education to grow careers. We recognize outstanding achievements in engineering, innovation, and technology. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. Follow Us On Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation. Engineering-inspired textiles, mugs, hats, and thoughtful gifts We connect top engineering talent with the world's most innovative companies We empower professionals with advanced engineering and tech education to grow careers. We recognize outstanding achievements in engineering, innovation, and technology. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. The robot uses artificial sweating to cool the powerful motors. Xiaomi has unveiled a major redesign of its CyberOne humanoid robot, introducing a new full-palm tactile bionic hand. It combines high-density sensing, improved dexterity, and an unusual liquid cooling system inspired by human sweating. The update was detailed through Xiaomi Technology’s official WeChat account, where the company outlined how the new hand design moves closer to human-scale manipulation and long-duration industrial operation. The redesigned hand is significantly smaller than the previous version, with Xiaomi reducing the hand’s volume by 60 percent to achieve a 1:1 human scale. The dimensions are based on a 1.73-meter (5.6 feet) human hand model, which the company says helps improve sim-to-real transfer when training robotic manipulation systems in simulation before deploying them in the real world. The new bionic hand also introduces a major increase in dexterity. Xiaomi said the configuration increases active degrees of freedom by 83 percent, bringing the robot’s bionic hand closer to the human hand standard of roughly 22 to 27 degrees of freedom required for complex manipulation tasks. A key part of the redesign is full-palm tactile sensing. The sensing area reportedly covers around 8,200 square millimeters, allowing the robot to detect pressure and contact across the entire palm rather than just the fingertips. This is significant because many robotic hands rely primarily on vision systems and fingertip sensors. Full-palm tactile sensing allows the robot to continue manipulating objects even when cameras are obstructed or when precise force control is required, such as in assembly tasks. Xiaomi also reported durability improvements, with the hand surviving more than 150,000 grasping cycles, which is substantially higher than the roughly 10,000-cycle failure threshold commonly seen in tendon-driven robotic hands. One of the most unusual features of the new CyberOne hand is its liquid cooling system, designed to address overheating in high-density motors used in dexterous robotic hands. According to Xiaomi, the hand’s compact motors can generate significant heat during continuous operation. To manage this, the company integrated 3D-printed metal liquid cooling channels inside the hand that function similarly to sweat glands. Thermal management is a major challenge in humanoid robotics, particularly for robotic hands, which must pack multiple motors, sensors, and transmission systems into a very small space. Overheating can reduce motor performance, shorten component lifespan, and limit continuous operation time. Xiaomi also shared early industrial testing results for the new hand. In automotive assembly tests, CyberOne reportedly achieved a 90.2 percent success rate for nut-fastening tasks within a strict 76-second factory cycle over three hours of operation. To support broader research in robotic manipulation and embodied AI, Xiaomi said it used tactile gloves for direct data collection and has open-sourced the TacRefineNet framework along with 61 hours of raw tactile data. The company suggests that combining full-palm tactile sensing with active liquid cooling could help enable humanoid robots to operate continuously in industrial environments, where dexterity, reliability, and thermal stability are critical for deployment. Atharva is a full-time content writer with a post-graduate degree in media & amp; entertainment and a graduate degree in electronics & telecommunications. He has written in the sports and technology domains respectively. In his leisure time, Atharva loves learning about digital marketing and watching soccer matches. His main goal behind joining Interesting Engineering is to learn more about how the recent technological advancements are helping human beings on both societal and individual levels in their daily lives. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Premium Follow

From daily news and career tips to monthly insights on AI, sustainability, Aerospace, and more—pick what matters and get it in your inbox. Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation. Engineering-inspired textiles, mugs, hats, and thoughtful gifts We connect top engineering talent with the world's most innovative companies. We empower professionals with advanced engineering and tech education to grow careers. We recognize outstanding achievements in engineering, innovation, and technology. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. Follow Us On Access expert insights, exclusive content, and a deeper dive into engineering and innovation. Engineering-inspired textiles, mugs, hats, and thoughtful gifts We connect top engineering talent with the world's most innovative companies We empower professionals with advanced engineering and tech education to grow careers. We recognize outstanding achievements in engineering, innovation, and technology. All Rights Reserved, IE Media, Inc. Figure AI’s humanoid robot walks beside Shawn Ryan in a real-world demo. In a recent episode of the Shawn Ryan Show, host Shawn Ryan came face-to-face with something that until recently belonged mostly to science fiction. The former U.S. Navy SEAL and CIA contractor walked alongside a fully functioning AI-Powered humanoid robot. The machine, Figure 03, developed by robotics startup Figure AI, is designed to perform many of the same tasks humans do, from folding laundry and washing dishes to working in factories and logistics centers. During the walkthrough demonstration with Figure AI founder and CEO Brett Adcock, Ryan interacted directly with the robot, testing its balance, movement, and responsiveness. The brief tour followed a much longer interview on the show, during which Adcock explained how his company is racing to build general-purpose humanoid robots that could eventually become commonplace in workplaces and possibly homes. The short demonstration video shows the Figure 03 robot walking beside Ryan, guided entirely by AI. According to Adcock, the robot stands about 5 feet 6 inches tall and weighs roughly 130-135 pounds, placing it close to human proportions. Unlike earlier robotics systems that relied heavily on scripted movements, the robot’s locomotion and actions are controlled through a neural network. As Adcock explained during the demo, the walking motion is generated by AI rather than traditional coded instructions. The robot contains around 40 joints, powered by electric motors equipped with sensors that help it maintain balance and perform tasks. Ryan, impressed by the light, foam-like exterior, questioned the robot’s durability and its ability to recover if it fell. Fall recovery, being an essential feature for robots operating in real-world environments, is a critical part of any humanoid evaluation. And while Figure is trained in simulation for dynamic stability, strength, and coordination, Addcock remarked that it totally depends on how the body falls, and that sometimes they even end up breaking necks. Another feature highlighted in the walkthrough is the robot’s hands. Cameras embedded in the palms help the machine visually track objects as it grasps them, while tactile sensors in every fingertip measure pressure during contact. This combination enables the robot to perform dexterous tasks. According to Adcock, Figure’s machines can lift boxes weighing up to 40 pounds and even fold a T-shirt. During the demonstration, Ryan jokingly asked whether the robot could crush his hand when shaking it. Adcock reassured him that the machine’s force control prevents such scenarios. While the demonstration showcased the robot’s movement and interaction, the podcast’s longer conversation focused on Figure AI’s broader ambitions. Founded in 2022, the company aims to develop general-purpose humanoid robots capable of replacing or assisting human labor in industries facing worker shortages. Adcock said early deployments are focused on commercial environments such as manufacturing and logistics. The company already works with several major partners, including BMW, where the robots are being tested in manufacturing settings. Figure is also collaborating with large logistics and real estate organizations to evaluate how humanoid robots could integrate into industrial workflows. Inside the robot’s torso sits most of its computing hardware, including GPUs and battery systems that power the machine. According to Adcock, a fully charged robot can operate for about four to five hours, after which it can recharge in roughly one hour. One unusual design feature is the charging system. Instead of plugging in cables, the robot charges wirelessly through pads embedded in its feet, allowing it to replenish energy simply by standing on a charging mat. Adcock compared the development of humanoid robots to the early years of smartphones, predicting rapid improvements with each generation of hardware. “This will look like the iPhone lineup,” he told Ryan, suggesting each new version will bring major improvements in capability. Figure AI’s ambitions go beyond building a handful of demonstration machines. According to Adcock, the company has already set up a manufacturing facility capable of producing robots on an increasing scale. When the production line is running, the factory can currently assemble one robot roughly every 90 minutes. In the long term, the company hopes to dramatically increase that output. He suggested that humanoid robots could eventually reach production levels comparable to consumer electronics, potentially reaching millions of units per year. The ultimate goal, he added, is a future where robots become as ubiquitous as smartphones, possibly even approaching a “robot for every human.” Humanoids are increasingly appearing outside the lab. Last week, a Figure humanoid robot made an appearance at a White House event focused on artificial intelligence, greeting attendees and demonstrating its capabilities. The widely publicized moment signaled how quickly humanoid robotics is moving from experimental prototypes into the public spotlight. The technology is increasingly entering mainstream discussion. Kaif Shaikh is a journalist and writer passionate about turning complex information into clear, impactful stories. His writing covers technology, sustainability, geopolitics, and occasionally fiction. A graduate in Journalism and Mass Communication, his work has appeared in the Times of India and beyond. After a near-fatal experience, Kaif began seeing both stories and silences differently. Outside work, he juggles far too many projects and passions, but always makes time to read, reflect, and hold onto the thread of wonder. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Exclusive content, expert insights and a deeper dive into engineering and tech. No ads, no limits. Premium Follow

Startup, który w zawrotnym tempie goni marzenia o robotycznej rewolucji, znów udowodnił, że ich humanoidy są już gotowe, by wyjść z laboratoriów prosto do fabryk, a w przyszłości także do naszych domów. Największym zaskoczeniem podczas demonstracji, którą poprowadził założyciel firmy Brett Adcock, był sposób poruszania się robota. W przeciwieństwie do maszyn starszej generacji, które poruszały się według sztywno zaprogramowanych skryptów, Figure 03 opiera się na „ruchach generowanych przez AI”. Oznacza to, że za każdy krok, uścisk dłoni czy stabilizację sylwetki odpowiada sieć neuronowa, a nie linijki tradycyjnego kodu. Robot o wzroście około 168 cm i wadze blisko 60 kg posiada proporcje zbliżone do ludzkich, co pozwala mu na operowanie w środowiskach zaprojektowanych dla nas. Shawn Ryan, testując responsywność maszyny, zwrócił uwagę na jej delikatne, piankowe wykończenie i zapytał o trwałość. Adcock szczerze przyznał, że choć roboty są trenowane w zaawansowanych symulacjach, upadki w realnym świecie wciąż bywają ryzykowne – czasem kończą się nawet „skręceniem karku”. Niemniej jednak, postęp w koordynacji ruchowej jest kolosalny. Figure 03 posiada aż 40 stawów napędzanych silnikami elektrycznymi, a jego dłonie to majstersztyk inżynierii: Robot jest w stanie podnosić skrzynie o wadze do 18 kg, co czyni go idealnym kandydatem do pracy w centrach logistycznych. Co ciekawe, system ładowania jest całkowicie bezprzewodowy – robot uzupełnia energię (która starcza na 4-5 godzin pracy), po prostu stając na specjalnej macie ładującej. Dobrze już wiemy, że firmy stojące za robotami, nie chcą ograniczać się tylko do prezentacji, nawet tych najbardziej widowiskowych. Adcock porównuje obecny etap rozwoju humanoidów do wczesnych lat smartfonów. Przewiduje, że każda kolejna generacja (podobnie jak kolejne modele iPhone’a) będzie przynosić skokową poprawę możliwości. Firma nie buduje już prototypów w garażu – posiada w pełni funkcjonalną fabrykę, która obecnie jest w stanie złożyć jednego robota w około 90 minut. Czytaj też: Robot, który obiera jabłka. Sharpa uczy maszyny ludzkiej zręczności Docelowo startup chce produkować miliony jednostek rocznie, dążąc do wizji „robota dla każdego człowieka”. Już teraz maszyny od Figure AI przechodzą testy w zakładach BMW, gdzie sprawdzają się w trudnych warunkach produkcyjnych. O tym, jak blisko mainstreamu jest ta technologia, świadczy fakt, że niedawno jeden z robotów Figure pojawił się w Białym Domu, witając gości podczas wydarzenia poświęconego sztucznej inteligencji. Przejście od eksperymentu do oficjalnych państwowych prezentacji zajęło firmie zaledwie cztery lata, a to imponujące. Oczywiście do spełnienia ambitnych celów wciąż daleka droga, ale jeśli do tego dojdzie, to być może za kilka lat roboty przestaną być ciekawostką, a staną się codziennością. Źródło: Shawn Ryan Show Portal technologiczny z ponad 29-letnią historią, piszący o nauce i technice, smartfonach, motoryzacji, fotografii. Technologie mamy we krwi!

Si votre email correspond à un compte, vous recevrez un lien de réinitialisation. Le secteur des robots humanoïdes, soutenu par des milliards d'investissements, ferait face à un risque de bulle selon des figures éminentes comme Rodney Brooks (cofondateur d'iRobot) et Yann LeCun (chef scientifique IA de Meta). Ils pointent l'incapacité des approches actuelles, notamment en matière de dextérité et d'intelligence générale, à justifier les promesses faites par des entreprises comme Tesla et Figure. La course pour développer des robots humanoïdes autonomes et polyvalents est en plein essor. Des sociétés comme Figure, récemment valorisée à un niveau "étonnant" de 39 milliards de dollars après une levée de fonds dépassant le milliard, ou encore Tesla avec son projet Optimus, nourrissent des ambitions démesurées. Le PDG de Figure, Mike Cagney, et Elon Musk, promettent un impact économique significatif d'ici cinq ans. Cependant, deux des esprits les plus respectés du domaine, le roboticien Rodney Brooks et le scientifique en chef de l'IA chez Meta, Yann LeCun, viennent de jeter une ombre sur cet optimisme financier. Ils estiment que nous sommes dans la phase initiale du cycle de battage médiatique (ou cycle de la hype) pour les humanoïdes, juste au moment où l'intelligence artificielle générale commence à descendre de son pic. Cette dichotomie entre l'optimisme financier et les réalités technologiques est au cœur de leur mise en garde. Rodney Brooks, roboticien de renom ayant passé des décennies au MIT, a co-écrit un article expliquant "Pourquoi les humanoïdes d'aujourd'hui n'apprendront pas la dextérité". Son constat est sans appel : les centaines de millions, voire les milliards, de dollars investis par les capitaux-risqueurs et les grandes entreprises technologiques pour leur entraînement sont dépensés pour une approche qui ne peut pas aboutir. Pour lui, croire qu'une dextérité humaine sera atteinte dans les décennies à venir est "de la pure fantaisie". Le cœur du problème réside dans les mains. Les mains humaines disposent d'environ 17 000 récepteurs tactiles spécialisés. Selon Brooks, aucune technologie robotique actuelle n'est proche de cette capacité. Alors que l'apprentissage automatique a transformé la reconnaissance vocale et le traitement d'image grâce à des décennies de données spécifiques, il n'existe pas de "tradition" équivalente pour les données de toucher dont les robots auraient besoin. Les tentatives de certaines entreprises, comme Figure ou Tesla, d'enseigner la dextérité aux robots en leur montrant des vidéos d'humains accomplissant des tâches sont particulièrement visées par le cofondateur d'iRobot. Il souligne que les efforts pour construire des mains de type humain, même s'ils existent depuis des décennies, n'ont pas encore résolu ce goulot d'étranglement fondamental lié à l'acquisition de données sensorielles riches. De son côté, Yann LeCun, lauréat du prix Turing et pionnier du deep learning, pointe du doigt l'intelligence même de ces machines. Le chef scientifique de Meta a averti lors du symposium inaugural de l'Impact de l'IA Générative du MIT que le "grand secret de l'industrie" est qu'aucune de ces entreprises n'a la moindre idée de la manière de rendre ces robots suffisamment intelligents pour être "généralement utiles". Il précise que si des robots peuvent être entraînés pour des tâches spécifiques, comme dans le domaine manufacturier, le robot domestique nécessitera des percées majeures en IA. LeCun estime que les grands modèles de langage (LLM) actuels ne sont pas la solution. Il rappelle qu'un enfant de quatre ans a emmagasiné autant de données visuelles "à haut débit" que le plus grand des LLM sur le texte public, soulignant que "nous n'atteindrons jamais l'intelligence de niveau humain en nous entraînant uniquement sur du texte". Pour sortir de cette impasse, l'avenir réside dans ce qu'on appelle les modèles du monde (world models). Ces systèmes IA apprennent à comprendre le monde physique à partir de données sensorielles (vidéo). L'objectif est de prédire l'état futur du monde après une action imaginée par l'agent. LeCun, qui mène des recherches sur des architectures comme le V-JEPA, est convaincu que ces modèles sont la clé pour que les robots accomplissent des tâches "sans entraînement" (zero shot). Au-delà de l'intelligence et de la dextérité, Rodney Brooks soulève un point souvent négligé : la sécurité. Les robots humanoïdes bipèdes, en raison de l'énergie massive qu'ils doivent déployer pour rester debout et marcher, représentent un danger non négligeable en cas de chute. Cette problématique physique s'ajoute aux défis logiciels, incitant Brooks à prédire que dans une quinzaine d'années, les humanoïdes qui réussiront ressembleront peu aux modèles anthropomorphes actuels. Ils seront probablement dotés de roues, de multiples bras et de capteurs spécialisés, abandonnant la forme humaine pour des raisons d'efficacité. L'alerte lancée par Brooks et LeCun force l'industrie à se poser la question fondamentale : le financement massif d'expériences d'entraînement coûteuses peut-il réellement conduire à une production de masse évolutive sans adresser d'abord les goulots d'étranglement de l'IA fondamentale ? Le débat fait rage, et l'échéance des cinq prochaines années fixée par certains entrepreneurs servira de juge de paix sur la viabilité de la forme humanoïde actuelle. La discussion est réservée aux membres GNT Commencez par créer un compte ou vous identifier Copyright © 2001-2026 GNT Media, tous droits réservés

Drones have gained traction as a versatile form of assistive robots for Blind and Low Vision (BLV) people. Nonetheless, novel interaction techniques are required to enable BLV people to communicate with drones naturally. In this work, we built an LLM-powered assistive drone for BLV users. We leverage an LLM to translate high-level user goals to step-by-step instructions for the drone and to extract visual information from the images. Through a formative study with BLV users (N=9), we identified envisioned use cases and desired interaction modalities. Then, we took a participatory and iterative approach to build a prototype, incorporating feedback received from 3 BLV users, as well as 5 domain experts. Finally, we conducted a user study with an additional 6 BLV participants to evaluate the iterated prototype, and received positive feedback. This work is contributing to a growing body of research on harnessing the power of LLMs to build a more inclusive world. Drones have gained traction as a versatile form of assistive robots for Blind and Low Vision (BLV) people. Nonetheless, novel interaction techniques are required to enable BLV people to communicate with drones naturally. In this work, we built an LLM-powered assistive drone for BLV users. We leverage an LLM to translate high-level user goals to step-by-step instructions for the drone and to extract visual information from the images. Through a formative study with BLV users (N=9), we identified envisioned use cases and desired interaction modalities. Then, we took a participatory and iterative approach to build a prototype, incorporating feedback received from 3 BLV users, as well as 5 domain experts. Finally, we conducted a user study with an additional 6 BLV participants to evaluate the iterated prototype, and received positive feedback. This work is contributing to a growing body of research on harnessing the power of LLMs to build a more inclusive world. Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur https://hal.science/hal-05567674 Soumis le : jeudi 26 mars 2026-08:38:42 Dernière modification le : lundi 30 mars 2026-12:48:20 Contact Ressources Informations Questions juridiques Portails CCSD

Tesla removes Model S and X custom orders as sunset officially begins SpaceX files confidentially for IPO that will rewrite the record books Elon Musk hints at “official ceremony” with throwback photo to close Tesla Model S, Model X chapter Elon Musk announces disappointing Tesla Optimus update Countdown: America is going back to the Moon and SpaceX holds the key to what comes after Tesla removes Model S and X custom orders as sunset officially begins Elon Musk hints at “official ceremony” with throwback photo to close Tesla Model S, Model X chapter Elon Musk announces disappointing Tesla Optimus update Musk forces Judge’s exit from shareholder battles over viral social media slip-up Tesla FSD mocks BMW human driver: Saves pedestrian from near miss SpaceX files confidentially for IPO that will rewrite the record books Countdown: America is going back to the Moon and SpaceX holds the key to what comes after Elon Musk debunks latest rumors about SpaceX IPO Tesla and SpaceX to merge in 2027, Wall Street analyst predicts TIME honors SpaceX’s Gwynne Shotwell: From employee No. 7 to world’s most valuable company SpaceX files confidentially for IPO that will rewrite the record books Elon Musk hints at “official ceremony” with throwback photo to close Tesla Model S, Model X chapter Elon Musk announces disappointing Tesla Optimus update Countdown: America is going back to the Moon and SpaceX holds the key to what comes after Elon Musk debunks latest rumors about SpaceX IPO In a post on X on March 31, Musk stated that Optimus 3 is mobile but requires some finishing touches before it is ready to be shown to the world. This update comes on the final day of the first quarter, a period when Tesla had previously signaled expectations for a Gen 3 reveal. Published on By Elon Musk announced a disappointing update to the unveiling of Tesla Optimus and its third-generation iteration, missing a timeline it aimed to hit in the first quarter of the year. Musk has confirmed that the highly anticipated Optimus Gen 3 humanoid robot is already walking around and operational, yet the public unveiling will face a short delay as the company applies final refinements. In a post on X on March 31, Musk stated that Optimus 3 is mobile but requires some finishing touches before it is ready to be shown to the world. This update comes on the final day of the first quarter, a period when Tesla had previously signaled expectations for a Gen 3 reveal. Optimus 3 is walking around, but needs some finishing touches before it’s ready to be shown — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 31, 2026Advertisement The announcement follows reports of Optimus Gen 3 appearing at the Tesla Diner in Los Angeles, where it was observed serving and moving about until sunset. Images and videos shared by observers captured the robot in action, highlighting its progress in real-world mobility. Tesla had aimed to showcase the production intent version of Optimus Gen 3 during the first quarter of 2026, positioning it as a major step toward factory deployment and eventual commercial availability. Musk has described the robot as featuring advanced capabilities, including highly dexterous hands with significant degrees of freedom, powered by Tesla’s AI systems for complex tasks. This minor postponement aligns with Tesla’s iterative approach to development. Earlier statements from Musk indicated that Gen 3 would represent the most advanced humanoid robot yet, designed primarily for internal factory use before scaling to external customers.Advertisement Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus Production timelines point toward low-volume output starting in the summer of 2026, with volume ramp-up targeted for 2027. The delay underscores the company’s commitment to quality over speed, ensuring the robot meets rigorous standards for safety and performance in practical environments. Optimus represents a cornerstone of Tesla’s long-term vision beyond electric vehicles. Musk has repeatedly emphasized that successful humanoid robotics could transform industries by addressing labor shortages and enabling new forms of productivity. Competitors in the space continue to advance their own platforms, yet Tesla’s vertical integration, from custom actuators to end-to-end AI training, positions Optimus as a potential leader. Community reactions on social media range from excitement over visible progress to impatience with shifting timelines, a familiar pattern in Tesla’s innovation journey.Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement Musk has confirmed that the highly anticipated Optimus Gen 3 humanoid robot is already walking around and operational, yet the public unveiling will face a short delay as the company applies final refinements. In a post on X on March 31, Musk stated that Optimus 3 is mobile but requires some finishing touches before it is ready to be shown to the world. This update comes on the final day of the first quarter, a period when Tesla had previously signaled expectations for a Gen 3 reveal. Optimus 3 is walking around, but needs some finishing touches before it’s ready to be shown — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 31, 2026Advertisement The announcement follows reports of Optimus Gen 3 appearing at the Tesla Diner in Los Angeles, where it was observed serving and moving about until sunset. Images and videos shared by observers captured the robot in action, highlighting its progress in real-world mobility. Tesla had aimed to showcase the production intent version of Optimus Gen 3 during the first quarter of 2026, positioning it as a major step toward factory deployment and eventual commercial availability. Musk has described the robot as featuring advanced capabilities, including highly dexterous hands with significant degrees of freedom, powered by Tesla’s AI systems for complex tasks. This minor postponement aligns with Tesla’s iterative approach to development. Earlier statements from Musk indicated that Gen 3 would represent the most advanced humanoid robot yet, designed primarily for internal factory use before scaling to external customers.Advertisement Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus Production timelines point toward low-volume output starting in the summer of 2026, with volume ramp-up targeted for 2027. The delay underscores the company’s commitment to quality over speed, ensuring the robot meets rigorous standards for safety and performance in practical environments. Optimus represents a cornerstone of Tesla’s long-term vision beyond electric vehicles. Musk has repeatedly emphasized that successful humanoid robotics could transform industries by addressing labor shortages and enabling new forms of productivity. Competitors in the space continue to advance their own platforms, yet Tesla’s vertical integration, from custom actuators to end-to-end AI training, positions Optimus as a potential leader. Community reactions on social media range from excitement over visible progress to impatience with shifting timelines, a familiar pattern in Tesla’s innovation journey.Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement In a post on X on March 31, Musk stated that Optimus 3 is mobile but requires some finishing touches before it is ready to be shown to the world. This update comes on the final day of the first quarter, a period when Tesla had previously signaled expectations for a Gen 3 reveal. Optimus 3 is walking around, but needs some finishing touches before it’s ready to be shown — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 31, 2026Advertisement The announcement follows reports of Optimus Gen 3 appearing at the Tesla Diner in Los Angeles, where it was observed serving and moving about until sunset. Images and videos shared by observers captured the robot in action, highlighting its progress in real-world mobility. Tesla had aimed to showcase the production intent version of Optimus Gen 3 during the first quarter of 2026, positioning it as a major step toward factory deployment and eventual commercial availability. Musk has described the robot as featuring advanced capabilities, including highly dexterous hands with significant degrees of freedom, powered by Tesla’s AI systems for complex tasks. This minor postponement aligns with Tesla’s iterative approach to development. Earlier statements from Musk indicated that Gen 3 would represent the most advanced humanoid robot yet, designed primarily for internal factory use before scaling to external customers.Advertisement Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus Production timelines point toward low-volume output starting in the summer of 2026, with volume ramp-up targeted for 2027. The delay underscores the company’s commitment to quality over speed, ensuring the robot meets rigorous standards for safety and performance in practical environments. Optimus represents a cornerstone of Tesla’s long-term vision beyond electric vehicles. Musk has repeatedly emphasized that successful humanoid robotics could transform industries by addressing labor shortages and enabling new forms of productivity. Competitors in the space continue to advance their own platforms, yet Tesla’s vertical integration, from custom actuators to end-to-end AI training, positions Optimus as a potential leader. Community reactions on social media range from excitement over visible progress to impatience with shifting timelines, a familiar pattern in Tesla’s innovation journey.Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement Optimus 3 is walking around, but needs some finishing touches before it’s ready to be shown — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 31, 2026Advertisement — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 31, 2026Advertisement The announcement follows reports of Optimus Gen 3 appearing at the Tesla Diner in Los Angeles, where it was observed serving and moving about until sunset. Images and videos shared by observers captured the robot in action, highlighting its progress in real-world mobility. Tesla had aimed to showcase the production intent version of Optimus Gen 3 during the first quarter of 2026, positioning it as a major step toward factory deployment and eventual commercial availability. Musk has described the robot as featuring advanced capabilities, including highly dexterous hands with significant degrees of freedom, powered by Tesla’s AI systems for complex tasks. This minor postponement aligns with Tesla’s iterative approach to development. Earlier statements from Musk indicated that Gen 3 would represent the most advanced humanoid robot yet, designed primarily for internal factory use before scaling to external customers.Advertisement Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus Production timelines point toward low-volume output starting in the summer of 2026, with volume ramp-up targeted for 2027. The delay underscores the company’s commitment to quality over speed, ensuring the robot meets rigorous standards for safety and performance in practical environments. Optimus represents a cornerstone of Tesla’s long-term vision beyond electric vehicles. Musk has repeatedly emphasized that successful humanoid robotics could transform industries by addressing labor shortages and enabling new forms of productivity. Competitors in the space continue to advance their own platforms, yet Tesla’s vertical integration, from custom actuators to end-to-end AI training, positions Optimus as a potential leader. Community reactions on social media range from excitement over visible progress to impatience with shifting timelines, a familiar pattern in Tesla’s innovation journey.Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement The announcement follows reports of Optimus Gen 3 appearing at the Tesla Diner in Los Angeles, where it was observed serving and moving about until sunset. Images and videos shared by observers captured the robot in action, highlighting its progress in real-world mobility. Tesla had aimed to showcase the production intent version of Optimus Gen 3 during the first quarter of 2026, positioning it as a major step toward factory deployment and eventual commercial availability. Musk has described the robot as featuring advanced capabilities, including highly dexterous hands with significant degrees of freedom, powered by Tesla’s AI systems for complex tasks. This minor postponement aligns with Tesla’s iterative approach to development. Earlier statements from Musk indicated that Gen 3 would represent the most advanced humanoid robot yet, designed primarily for internal factory use before scaling to external customers.Advertisement Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus Production timelines point toward low-volume output starting in the summer of 2026, with volume ramp-up targeted for 2027. The delay underscores the company’s commitment to quality over speed, ensuring the robot meets rigorous standards for safety and performance in practical environments. Optimus represents a cornerstone of Tesla’s long-term vision beyond electric vehicles. Musk has repeatedly emphasized that successful humanoid robotics could transform industries by addressing labor shortages and enabling new forms of productivity. Competitors in the space continue to advance their own platforms, yet Tesla’s vertical integration, from custom actuators to end-to-end AI training, positions Optimus as a potential leader. Community reactions on social media range from excitement over visible progress to impatience with shifting timelines, a familiar pattern in Tesla’s innovation journey.Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement Tesla had aimed to showcase the production intent version of Optimus Gen 3 during the first quarter of 2026, positioning it as a major step toward factory deployment and eventual commercial availability. Musk has described the robot as featuring advanced capabilities, including highly dexterous hands with significant degrees of freedom, powered by Tesla’s AI systems for complex tasks. This minor postponement aligns with Tesla’s iterative approach to development. Earlier statements from Musk indicated that Gen 3 would represent the most advanced humanoid robot yet, designed primarily for internal factory use before scaling to external customers.Advertisement Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus Production timelines point toward low-volume output starting in the summer of 2026, with volume ramp-up targeted for 2027. The delay underscores the company’s commitment to quality over speed, ensuring the robot meets rigorous standards for safety and performance in practical environments. Optimus represents a cornerstone of Tesla’s long-term vision beyond electric vehicles. Musk has repeatedly emphasized that successful humanoid robotics could transform industries by addressing labor shortages and enabling new forms of productivity. Competitors in the space continue to advance their own platforms, yet Tesla’s vertical integration, from custom actuators to end-to-end AI training, positions Optimus as a potential leader. Community reactions on social media range from excitement over visible progress to impatience with shifting timelines, a familiar pattern in Tesla’s innovation journey.Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement This minor postponement aligns with Tesla’s iterative approach to development. Earlier statements from Musk indicated that Gen 3 would represent the most advanced humanoid robot yet, designed primarily for internal factory use before scaling to external customers.Advertisement Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus Production timelines point toward low-volume output starting in the summer of 2026, with volume ramp-up targeted for 2027. The delay underscores the company’s commitment to quality over speed, ensuring the robot meets rigorous standards for safety and performance in practical environments. Optimus represents a cornerstone of Tesla’s long-term vision beyond electric vehicles. Musk has repeatedly emphasized that successful humanoid robotics could transform industries by addressing labor shortages and enabling new forms of productivity. Competitors in the space continue to advance their own platforms, yet Tesla’s vertical integration, from custom actuators to end-to-end AI training, positions Optimus as a potential leader. Community reactions on social media range from excitement over visible progress to impatience with shifting timelines, a familiar pattern in Tesla’s innovation journey.Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus Production timelines point toward low-volume output starting in the summer of 2026, with volume ramp-up targeted for 2027. The delay underscores the company’s commitment to quality over speed, ensuring the robot meets rigorous standards for safety and performance in practical environments. Optimus represents a cornerstone of Tesla’s long-term vision beyond electric vehicles. Musk has repeatedly emphasized that successful humanoid robotics could transform industries by addressing labor shortages and enabling new forms of productivity. Competitors in the space continue to advance their own platforms, yet Tesla’s vertical integration, from custom actuators to end-to-end AI training, positions Optimus as a potential leader. Community reactions on social media range from excitement over visible progress to impatience with shifting timelines, a familiar pattern in Tesla’s innovation journey.Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement Production timelines point toward low-volume output starting in the summer of 2026, with volume ramp-up targeted for 2027. The delay underscores the company’s commitment to quality over speed, ensuring the robot meets rigorous standards for safety and performance in practical environments. Optimus represents a cornerstone of Tesla’s long-term vision beyond electric vehicles. Musk has repeatedly emphasized that successful humanoid robotics could transform industries by addressing labor shortages and enabling new forms of productivity. Competitors in the space continue to advance their own platforms, yet Tesla’s vertical integration, from custom actuators to end-to-end AI training, positions Optimus as a potential leader. Community reactions on social media range from excitement over visible progress to impatience with shifting timelines, a familiar pattern in Tesla’s innovation journey.Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement Optimus represents a cornerstone of Tesla’s long-term vision beyond electric vehicles. Musk has repeatedly emphasized that successful humanoid robotics could transform industries by addressing labor shortages and enabling new forms of productivity. Competitors in the space continue to advance their own platforms, yet Tesla’s vertical integration, from custom actuators to end-to-end AI training, positions Optimus as a potential leader. Community reactions on social media range from excitement over visible progress to impatience with shifting timelines, a familiar pattern in Tesla’s innovation journey.Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement Competitors in the space continue to advance their own platforms, yet Tesla’s vertical integration, from custom actuators to end-to-end AI training, positions Optimus as a potential leader. Community reactions on social media range from excitement over visible progress to impatience with shifting timelines, a familiar pattern in Tesla’s innovation journey.Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement Investors and enthusiasts view Optimus as critical to Tesla’s valuation, potentially surpassing its automotive business in scale. With the robot already demonstrating walking and basic interactions, the finishing touches likely involve software polishing, hardware fine-tuning, and reliability enhancements. Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement Musk’s update suggests the reveal could arrive in the coming weeks or months, maintaining momentum toward broader deployment. As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement As Tesla pushes the boundaries of physical artificial intelligence, this latest development keeps Optimus in the spotlight. The company continues to prioritize rapid iteration while delivering on its promises to shareholders and customers. The robotics revolution at Tesla appears closer than ever, promising profound impacts on manufacturing, services, and daily life in the years ahead. Advertisement Joey has been a journalist covering electric mobility at TESLARATI since August 2019. In his spare time, Joey is playing golf, watching MMA, or cheering on any of his favorite sports teams, including the Baltimore Ravens and Orioles, Miami Heat, Washington Capitals, and Penn State Nittany Lions. You can get in touch with joey at joey@teslarati.com. He is also on X @KlenderJoey. If you're looking for great Tesla accessories, check out shop.teslarati.com SpaceX files confidentially for a record-breaking IPO targeting a $1.75T valuation and $80B raise, driven by Starlink growth and its xAI merger. Published on By Elon Musk’s rocket and satellite company submitted its draft registration to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission today for an initial public offering, targeting June at a $1.75 trillion valuation. This would be the largest in history. SpaceX has filed confidentially with the SEC, first reported by Bloomberg. SpaceX would be valued above every S&P 500 company except Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, and Amazon. The filing uses a confidential process that allows companies to work through SEC disclosures privately before initiating a public roadshow. With a June target, official details through a formal prospectus is expected to go public in April or early May, after which SpaceX must wait at least 15 days before beginning investor marketing. SpaceX IPO is coming, CEO Elon Musk confirms Advertisement While SpaceX is best known for its Falcon 9 and Starship rockets, the $1.75 trillion valuation is anchored by Starlink, its satellite internet service. Starlink ended 2025 with 9.2 million subscribers and over $10 billion in revenue, which is a figure analysts project could reach a staggering $24 billion by the end of 2026. A February all-stock merger with xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence venture, further boosted the valuation. SpaceX officially acquires xAI, merging rockets with AI expertise Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley are lined up as senior underwriters. SpaceX is also considering a dual-class share structure to preserve insider voting control, and plans to allocate up to 30% of shares to retail investors, which is roughly three times the typical norm. Advertisement SpaceX has filed confidentially with the SEC, first reported by Bloomberg. SpaceX would be valued above every S&P 500 company except Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, and Amazon. The filing uses a confidential process that allows companies to work through SEC disclosures privately before initiating a public roadshow. With a June target, official details through a formal prospectus is expected to go public in April or early May, after which SpaceX must wait at least 15 days before beginning investor marketing. SpaceX IPO is coming, CEO Elon Musk confirms Advertisement While SpaceX is best known for its Falcon 9 and Starship rockets, the $1.75 trillion valuation is anchored by Starlink, its satellite internet service. Starlink ended 2025 with 9.2 million subscribers and over $10 billion in revenue, which is a figure analysts project could reach a staggering $24 billion by the end of 2026. A February all-stock merger with xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence venture, further boosted the valuation. SpaceX officially acquires xAI, merging rockets with AI expertise Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley are lined up as senior underwriters. SpaceX is also considering a dual-class share structure to preserve insider voting control, and plans to allocate up to 30% of shares to retail investors, which is roughly three times the typical norm. Advertisement The filing uses a confidential process that allows companies to work through SEC disclosures privately before initiating a public roadshow. With a June target, official details through a formal prospectus is expected to go public in April or early May, after which SpaceX must wait at least 15 days before beginning investor marketing. SpaceX IPO is coming, CEO Elon Musk confirms Advertisement While SpaceX is best known for its Falcon 9 and Starship rockets, the $1.75 trillion valuation is anchored by Starlink, its satellite internet service. Starlink ended 2025 with 9.2 million subscribers and over $10 billion in revenue, which is a figure analysts project could reach a staggering $24 billion by the end of 2026. A February all-stock merger with xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence venture, further boosted the valuation. SpaceX officially acquires xAI, merging rockets with AI expertise Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley are lined up as senior underwriters. SpaceX is also considering a dual-class share structure to preserve insider voting control, and plans to allocate up to 30% of shares to retail investors, which is roughly three times the typical norm. Advertisement SpaceX IPO is coming, CEO Elon Musk confirms Advertisement While SpaceX is best known for its Falcon 9 and Starship rockets, the $1.75 trillion valuation is anchored by Starlink, its satellite internet service. Starlink ended 2025 with 9.2 million subscribers and over $10 billion in revenue, which is a figure analysts project could reach a staggering $24 billion by the end of 2026. A February all-stock merger with xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence venture, further boosted the valuation. SpaceX officially acquires xAI, merging rockets with AI expertise Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley are lined up as senior underwriters. SpaceX is also considering a dual-class share structure to preserve insider voting control, and plans to allocate up to 30% of shares to retail investors, which is roughly three times the typical norm. Advertisement While SpaceX is best known for its Falcon 9 and Starship rockets, the $1.75 trillion valuation is anchored by Starlink, its satellite internet service. Starlink ended 2025 with 9.2 million subscribers and over $10 billion in revenue, which is a figure analysts project could reach a staggering $24 billion by the end of 2026. A February all-stock merger with xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence venture, further boosted the valuation. SpaceX officially acquires xAI, merging rockets with AI expertise Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley are lined up as senior underwriters. SpaceX is also considering a dual-class share structure to preserve insider voting control, and plans to allocate up to 30% of shares to retail investors, which is roughly three times the typical norm. Advertisement SpaceX officially acquires xAI, merging rockets with AI expertise Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley are lined up as senior underwriters. SpaceX is also considering a dual-class share structure to preserve insider voting control, and plans to allocate up to 30% of shares to retail investors, which is roughly three times the typical norm. Advertisement Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, and Morgan Stanley are lined up as senior underwriters. SpaceX is also considering a dual-class share structure to preserve insider voting control, and plans to allocate up to 30% of shares to retail investors, which is roughly three times the typical norm. Advertisement Elon Musk promises an official ceremony to mark the end of Tesla Model S and Model X production. Published on By Tesla has officially begun winding down production of the Model S and Model X, sending farewell emails to U.S. customers on March 27 and updating the website to reflect the end of the line. Shoppers visiting Tesla.com now find only a limited set of Model S and Model X inventory units available for purchase, with no option to configure a new factory build. The move formalizes what CEO Elon Musk announced on the company’s Q4 2025 earnings call in January, when he said it was “time to basically bring the Model S and X programs to an end with an honorable discharge.” Musk posted on X a throwback photo of himself speaking at the Model S production launch in 2012, and noting “We will have an official ceremony to mark the ending of an era. I love those cars.” The mention of an official ceremony is notable. Tesla has not held a formal farewell event for a vehicle before, and Musk’s wording suggests this will be something deliberate rather than a quiet line shutdown. Given that Musk’s X post shows a photo of him on stage with a microphone in front of an audience at the Fremont factory, it wouldn’t be too far-fetched to expect a closing ceremony to take place at the same location. Perhaps? Whether it becomes a public event, a private gathering for employees, or a livestreamed moment on X remains to be seen. Custom orders of the Tesla Model S & X have come to an end. All that’s left are some in inventory. We will have an official ceremony to mark the ending of an era. I love those cars.Advertisement This was me at production launch 14 years ago: pic.twitter.com/6kvCf9HTHc — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2026 The Model S first went on sale nearly fifteen years ago and was Tesla’s first fully in-house designed vehicle, proving that an electric car could be fast, desirable, and capable of long distance on a single charge. The Model X followed in 2015, turning heads with its unmistakable and distinctive falcon-wing doors, while becoming one of the first all-electric SUVs on the market. Tesla’s two flagship vehicles would ultimately push legacy automakers to take all-electric transportation seriously and help fund development of the more affordable Model 3 and Model Y.Advertisement By 2025, however, both models had been reduced to a rounding error in Tesla’s sales figures. Musk was direct about what comes next, stating “We are going to convert that production space to an Optimus factory. It’s part of our overall shift to an autonomous future.” Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus That shift is already underway. Tesla officially started Optimus Gen 3 production at its Fremont factory in January 2026, with the line targeting a run rate of one million units per year. The Gen 3 robot features 22 degrees of freedom per hand, runs on Tesla’s AI5 chip, and shares the same neural network architecture as Full Self-Driving. A dedicated Optimus factory at Gigafactory Texas is also under construction, with a planned annual capacity of 10 million units. The production lines that once built the Model S and Model X are being converted to support that ramp. Tesla confirmed it will continue to support existing owners with service, software updates, and parts for as long as people own the vehicles. For buyers still interested in a new example, remaining U.S. inventory is discounted and the window is closing fast.Advertisement Musk posted on X a throwback photo of himself speaking at the Model S production launch in 2012, and noting “We will have an official ceremony to mark the ending of an era. I love those cars.” The mention of an official ceremony is notable. Tesla has not held a formal farewell event for a vehicle before, and Musk’s wording suggests this will be something deliberate rather than a quiet line shutdown. Given that Musk’s X post shows a photo of him on stage with a microphone in front of an audience at the Fremont factory, it wouldn’t be too far-fetched to expect a closing ceremony to take place at the same location. Perhaps? Whether it becomes a public event, a private gathering for employees, or a livestreamed moment on X remains to be seen. Custom orders of the Tesla Model S & X have come to an end. All that’s left are some in inventory. We will have an official ceremony to mark the ending of an era. I love those cars.Advertisement This was me at production launch 14 years ago: pic.twitter.com/6kvCf9HTHc — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2026 The Model S first went on sale nearly fifteen years ago and was Tesla’s first fully in-house designed vehicle, proving that an electric car could be fast, desirable, and capable of long distance on a single charge. The Model X followed in 2015, turning heads with its unmistakable and distinctive falcon-wing doors, while becoming one of the first all-electric SUVs on the market. Tesla’s two flagship vehicles would ultimately push legacy automakers to take all-electric transportation seriously and help fund development of the more affordable Model 3 and Model Y.Advertisement By 2025, however, both models had been reduced to a rounding error in Tesla’s sales figures. Musk was direct about what comes next, stating “We are going to convert that production space to an Optimus factory. It’s part of our overall shift to an autonomous future.” Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus That shift is already underway. Tesla officially started Optimus Gen 3 production at its Fremont factory in January 2026, with the line targeting a run rate of one million units per year. The Gen 3 robot features 22 degrees of freedom per hand, runs on Tesla’s AI5 chip, and shares the same neural network architecture as Full Self-Driving. A dedicated Optimus factory at Gigafactory Texas is also under construction, with a planned annual capacity of 10 million units. The production lines that once built the Model S and Model X are being converted to support that ramp. Tesla confirmed it will continue to support existing owners with service, software updates, and parts for as long as people own the vehicles. For buyers still interested in a new example, remaining U.S. inventory is discounted and the window is closing fast.Advertisement The mention of an official ceremony is notable. Tesla has not held a formal farewell event for a vehicle before, and Musk’s wording suggests this will be something deliberate rather than a quiet line shutdown. Given that Musk’s X post shows a photo of him on stage with a microphone in front of an audience at the Fremont factory, it wouldn’t be too far-fetched to expect a closing ceremony to take place at the same location. Perhaps? Whether it becomes a public event, a private gathering for employees, or a livestreamed moment on X remains to be seen. Custom orders of the Tesla Model S & X have come to an end. All that’s left are some in inventory. We will have an official ceremony to mark the ending of an era. I love those cars.Advertisement This was me at production launch 14 years ago: pic.twitter.com/6kvCf9HTHc — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2026 The Model S first went on sale nearly fifteen years ago and was Tesla’s first fully in-house designed vehicle, proving that an electric car could be fast, desirable, and capable of long distance on a single charge. The Model X followed in 2015, turning heads with its unmistakable and distinctive falcon-wing doors, while becoming one of the first all-electric SUVs on the market. Tesla’s two flagship vehicles would ultimately push legacy automakers to take all-electric transportation seriously and help fund development of the more affordable Model 3 and Model Y.Advertisement By 2025, however, both models had been reduced to a rounding error in Tesla’s sales figures. Musk was direct about what comes next, stating “We are going to convert that production space to an Optimus factory. It’s part of our overall shift to an autonomous future.” Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus That shift is already underway. Tesla officially started Optimus Gen 3 production at its Fremont factory in January 2026, with the line targeting a run rate of one million units per year. The Gen 3 robot features 22 degrees of freedom per hand, runs on Tesla’s AI5 chip, and shares the same neural network architecture as Full Self-Driving. A dedicated Optimus factory at Gigafactory Texas is also under construction, with a planned annual capacity of 10 million units. The production lines that once built the Model S and Model X are being converted to support that ramp. Tesla confirmed it will continue to support existing owners with service, software updates, and parts for as long as people own the vehicles. For buyers still interested in a new example, remaining U.S. inventory is discounted and the window is closing fast.Advertisement Custom orders of the Tesla Model S & X have come to an end. All that’s left are some in inventory. We will have an official ceremony to mark the ending of an era. I love those cars.Advertisement This was me at production launch 14 years ago: pic.twitter.com/6kvCf9HTHc — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2026 We will have an official ceremony to mark the ending of an era. I love those cars.Advertisement This was me at production launch 14 years ago: pic.twitter.com/6kvCf9HTHc — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2026 This was me at production launch 14 years ago: pic.twitter.com/6kvCf9HTHc — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2026 — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2026 The Model S first went on sale nearly fifteen years ago and was Tesla’s first fully in-house designed vehicle, proving that an electric car could be fast, desirable, and capable of long distance on a single charge. The Model X followed in 2015, turning heads with its unmistakable and distinctive falcon-wing doors, while becoming one of the first all-electric SUVs on the market. Tesla’s two flagship vehicles would ultimately push legacy automakers to take all-electric transportation seriously and help fund development of the more affordable Model 3 and Model Y.Advertisement By 2025, however, both models had been reduced to a rounding error in Tesla’s sales figures. Musk was direct about what comes next, stating “We are going to convert that production space to an Optimus factory. It’s part of our overall shift to an autonomous future.” Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus That shift is already underway. Tesla officially started Optimus Gen 3 production at its Fremont factory in January 2026, with the line targeting a run rate of one million units per year. The Gen 3 robot features 22 degrees of freedom per hand, runs on Tesla’s AI5 chip, and shares the same neural network architecture as Full Self-Driving. A dedicated Optimus factory at Gigafactory Texas is also under construction, with a planned annual capacity of 10 million units. The production lines that once built the Model S and Model X are being converted to support that ramp. Tesla confirmed it will continue to support existing owners with service, software updates, and parts for as long as people own the vehicles. For buyers still interested in a new example, remaining U.S. inventory is discounted and the window is closing fast.Advertisement The Model S first went on sale nearly fifteen years ago and was Tesla’s first fully in-house designed vehicle, proving that an electric car could be fast, desirable, and capable of long distance on a single charge. The Model X followed in 2015, turning heads with its unmistakable and distinctive falcon-wing doors, while becoming one of the first all-electric SUVs on the market. Tesla’s two flagship vehicles would ultimately push legacy automakers to take all-electric transportation seriously and help fund development of the more affordable Model 3 and Model Y.Advertisement By 2025, however, both models had been reduced to a rounding error in Tesla’s sales figures. Musk was direct about what comes next, stating “We are going to convert that production space to an Optimus factory. It’s part of our overall shift to an autonomous future.” Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus That shift is already underway. Tesla officially started Optimus Gen 3 production at its Fremont factory in January 2026, with the line targeting a run rate of one million units per year. The Gen 3 robot features 22 degrees of freedom per hand, runs on Tesla’s AI5 chip, and shares the same neural network architecture as Full Self-Driving. A dedicated Optimus factory at Gigafactory Texas is also under construction, with a planned annual capacity of 10 million units. The production lines that once built the Model S and Model X are being converted to support that ramp. Tesla confirmed it will continue to support existing owners with service, software updates, and parts for as long as people own the vehicles. For buyers still interested in a new example, remaining U.S. inventory is discounted and the window is closing fast.Advertisement By 2025, however, both models had been reduced to a rounding error in Tesla’s sales figures. Musk was direct about what comes next, stating “We are going to convert that production space to an Optimus factory. It’s part of our overall shift to an autonomous future.” Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus That shift is already underway. Tesla officially started Optimus Gen 3 production at its Fremont factory in January 2026, with the line targeting a run rate of one million units per year. The Gen 3 robot features 22 degrees of freedom per hand, runs on Tesla’s AI5 chip, and shares the same neural network architecture as Full Self-Driving. A dedicated Optimus factory at Gigafactory Texas is also under construction, with a planned annual capacity of 10 million units. The production lines that once built the Model S and Model X are being converted to support that ramp. Tesla confirmed it will continue to support existing owners with service, software updates, and parts for as long as people own the vehicles. For buyers still interested in a new example, remaining U.S. inventory is discounted and the window is closing fast.Advertisement Elon Musk’s $10 Trillion robot: Inside Tesla’s push to mass produce Optimus That shift is already underway. Tesla officially started Optimus Gen 3 production at its Fremont factory in January 2026, with the line targeting a run rate of one million units per year. The Gen 3 robot features 22 degrees of freedom per hand, runs on Tesla’s AI5 chip, and shares the same neural network architecture as Full Self-Driving. A dedicated Optimus factory at Gigafactory Texas is also under construction, with a planned annual capacity of 10 million units. The production lines that once built the Model S and Model X are being converted to support that ramp. Tesla confirmed it will continue to support existing owners with service, software updates, and parts for as long as people own the vehicles. For buyers still interested in a new example, remaining U.S. inventory is discounted and the window is closing fast.Advertisement That shift is already underway. Tesla officially started Optimus Gen 3 production at its Fremont factory in January 2026, with the line targeting a run rate of one million units per year. The Gen 3 robot features 22 degrees of freedom per hand, runs on Tesla’s AI5 chip, and shares the same neural network architecture as Full Self-Driving. A dedicated Optimus factory at Gigafactory Texas is also under construction, with a planned annual capacity of 10 million units. The production lines that once built the Model S and Model X are being converted to support that ramp. Tesla confirmed it will continue to support existing owners with service, software updates, and parts for as long as people own the vehicles. For buyers still interested in a new example, remaining U.S. inventory is discounted and the window is closing fast.Advertisement Tesla confirmed it will continue to support existing owners with service, software updates, and parts for as long as people own the vehicles. For buyers still interested in a new example, remaining U.S. inventory is discounted and the window is closing fast.Advertisement NASA’s Artemis II launches Wednesday, sending humans near the Moon for the first time since 1972. Published on By For the first time since Apollo 17 touched down on the lunar surface in December 1972, the United States is sending humans back toward the Moon. NASA’s Artemis II mission is set to launch as early as this week from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, carrying four astronauts on a 10-day journey around the Moon and back to Earth. It will not land anyone on the surface this time, but it is the first crewed flight in over half a century to travel beyond low Earth orbit, and it sets the stage for Elon Musk’s SpaceX missions to follow. The mission uses NASA’s Space Launch System rocket and the Orion spacecraft, which will fly around the Moon before splashing down in the Pacific Ocean around April 10. For context, an uncrewed Artemis I flew the same path in 2022, proving the hardware worked. Artemis II now tests it with people aboard. According to NASA’s official countdown blog, launch preparations are on track with an 80 percent chance of favorable weather. “Hey, let’s go to the moon!” Commander Wiseman told reporters upon arriving at Kennedy Space Center. Source: NASA Beyond Artemis II lies the lander question, and that is where SpaceX enters directly. In 2021, NASA awarded SpaceX a $2.89 billion contract to develop the Starship Human Landing System, a modified version of Starship designed to ferry astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface. The original plan called for SpaceX to deliver that lander for Artemis III, which was to be the first crewed lunar landing. Timing for Starship development, however, caused NASA to restructure the mission sequence entirely. Before SpaceX’s Starship Human Landing System (HLS) can put anyone on the Moon, it has to solve a problem no rocket has demonstrated at scale, which is refueling in orbit. Because the Starship HLS requires approximately ten tanker launches worth of propellant loaded into a depot in low Earth orbit before it has enough fuel to reach the lunar surface, SpaceX plans to conduct this refueling process using its upgraded V3 Starship. And until that demonstration flies and succeeds, the Starship moon lander remains a question mark.Advertisement SpaceX’s Starship V3 is almost ready and it will change space travel forever In February 2026, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman confirmed that Artemis III, now planned for mid-2027, and will instead test lunar landers in low Earth orbit, with the actual landing pushed to Artemis IV that’s targeted for 2028. Musk responded to earlier criticism of SpaceX’s schedule by posting on X that his company is “moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry,” and added that “Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission.” The contract competition was also reopened in October 2025 by then NASA chief Sean Duffy, who cited Starship’s delays and said the agency needed speed given China’s own stated goal of landing astronauts on the Moon by 2030. They won’t. SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry. Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words.Advertisement — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025 Artemis came from the first Trump administration’s 2017 Space Policy Directive 1, which directed NASA to return humans to the Moon. The program picked up pace through the 2020s, with the Orion spacecraft and SLS taking years to develop at enormous costs. SpaceX entered the picture in 2021 as the chosen lander contractor, tying the commercial space sector into what had historically been an all government undertaking. Whether SpaceX’s Starship ultimately carries astronauts to the lunar surface or shares that role with Blue Origin’s competing lander, this week’s Artemis II launch is the necessary first step. Getting four humans to the Moon’s vicinity and back safely is the proof of concept everything else depends on. Advertisement The mission uses NASA’s Space Launch System rocket and the Orion spacecraft, which will fly around the Moon before splashing down in the Pacific Ocean around April 10. For context, an uncrewed Artemis I flew the same path in 2022, proving the hardware worked. Artemis II now tests it with people aboard. According to NASA’s official countdown blog, launch preparations are on track with an 80 percent chance of favorable weather. “Hey, let’s go to the moon!” Commander Wiseman told reporters upon arriving at Kennedy Space Center. Source: NASA Beyond Artemis II lies the lander question, and that is where SpaceX enters directly. In 2021, NASA awarded SpaceX a $2.89 billion contract to develop the Starship Human Landing System, a modified version of Starship designed to ferry astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface. The original plan called for SpaceX to deliver that lander for Artemis III, which was to be the first crewed lunar landing. Timing for Starship development, however, caused NASA to restructure the mission sequence entirely. Before SpaceX’s Starship Human Landing System (HLS) can put anyone on the Moon, it has to solve a problem no rocket has demonstrated at scale, which is refueling in orbit. Because the Starship HLS requires approximately ten tanker launches worth of propellant loaded into a depot in low Earth orbit before it has enough fuel to reach the lunar surface, SpaceX plans to conduct this refueling process using its upgraded V3 Starship. And until that demonstration flies and succeeds, the Starship moon lander remains a question mark.Advertisement SpaceX’s Starship V3 is almost ready and it will change space travel forever In February 2026, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman confirmed that Artemis III, now planned for mid-2027, and will instead test lunar landers in low Earth orbit, with the actual landing pushed to Artemis IV that’s targeted for 2028. Musk responded to earlier criticism of SpaceX’s schedule by posting on X that his company is “moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry,” and added that “Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission.” The contract competition was also reopened in October 2025 by then NASA chief Sean Duffy, who cited Starship’s delays and said the agency needed speed given China’s own stated goal of landing astronauts on the Moon by 2030. They won’t. SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry. Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words.Advertisement — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025 Artemis came from the first Trump administration’s 2017 Space Policy Directive 1, which directed NASA to return humans to the Moon. The program picked up pace through the 2020s, with the Orion spacecraft and SLS taking years to develop at enormous costs. SpaceX entered the picture in 2021 as the chosen lander contractor, tying the commercial space sector into what had historically been an all government undertaking. Whether SpaceX’s Starship ultimately carries astronauts to the lunar surface or shares that role with Blue Origin’s competing lander, this week’s Artemis II launch is the necessary first step. Getting four humans to the Moon’s vicinity and back safely is the proof of concept everything else depends on. Advertisement According to NASA’s official countdown blog, launch preparations are on track with an 80 percent chance of favorable weather. “Hey, let’s go to the moon!” Commander Wiseman told reporters upon arriving at Kennedy Space Center. Source: NASA Beyond Artemis II lies the lander question, and that is where SpaceX enters directly. In 2021, NASA awarded SpaceX a $2.89 billion contract to develop the Starship Human Landing System, a modified version of Starship designed to ferry astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface. The original plan called for SpaceX to deliver that lander for Artemis III, which was to be the first crewed lunar landing. Timing for Starship development, however, caused NASA to restructure the mission sequence entirely. Before SpaceX’s Starship Human Landing System (HLS) can put anyone on the Moon, it has to solve a problem no rocket has demonstrated at scale, which is refueling in orbit. Because the Starship HLS requires approximately ten tanker launches worth of propellant loaded into a depot in low Earth orbit before it has enough fuel to reach the lunar surface, SpaceX plans to conduct this refueling process using its upgraded V3 Starship. And until that demonstration flies and succeeds, the Starship moon lander remains a question mark.Advertisement SpaceX’s Starship V3 is almost ready and it will change space travel forever In February 2026, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman confirmed that Artemis III, now planned for mid-2027, and will instead test lunar landers in low Earth orbit, with the actual landing pushed to Artemis IV that’s targeted for 2028. Musk responded to earlier criticism of SpaceX’s schedule by posting on X that his company is “moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry,” and added that “Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission.” The contract competition was also reopened in October 2025 by then NASA chief Sean Duffy, who cited Starship’s delays and said the agency needed speed given China’s own stated goal of landing astronauts on the Moon by 2030. They won’t. SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry. Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words.Advertisement — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025 Artemis came from the first Trump administration’s 2017 Space Policy Directive 1, which directed NASA to return humans to the Moon. The program picked up pace through the 2020s, with the Orion spacecraft and SLS taking years to develop at enormous costs. SpaceX entered the picture in 2021 as the chosen lander contractor, tying the commercial space sector into what had historically been an all government undertaking. Whether SpaceX’s Starship ultimately carries astronauts to the lunar surface or shares that role with Blue Origin’s competing lander, this week’s Artemis II launch is the necessary first step. Getting four humans to the Moon’s vicinity and back safely is the proof of concept everything else depends on. Advertisement Source: NASA Beyond Artemis II lies the lander question, and that is where SpaceX enters directly. In 2021, NASA awarded SpaceX a $2.89 billion contract to develop the Starship Human Landing System, a modified version of Starship designed to ferry astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface. The original plan called for SpaceX to deliver that lander for Artemis III, which was to be the first crewed lunar landing. Timing for Starship development, however, caused NASA to restructure the mission sequence entirely. Before SpaceX’s Starship Human Landing System (HLS) can put anyone on the Moon, it has to solve a problem no rocket has demonstrated at scale, which is refueling in orbit. Because the Starship HLS requires approximately ten tanker launches worth of propellant loaded into a depot in low Earth orbit before it has enough fuel to reach the lunar surface, SpaceX plans to conduct this refueling process using its upgraded V3 Starship. And until that demonstration flies and succeeds, the Starship moon lander remains a question mark.Advertisement SpaceX’s Starship V3 is almost ready and it will change space travel forever In February 2026, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman confirmed that Artemis III, now planned for mid-2027, and will instead test lunar landers in low Earth orbit, with the actual landing pushed to Artemis IV that’s targeted for 2028. Musk responded to earlier criticism of SpaceX’s schedule by posting on X that his company is “moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry,” and added that “Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission.” The contract competition was also reopened in October 2025 by then NASA chief Sean Duffy, who cited Starship’s delays and said the agency needed speed given China’s own stated goal of landing astronauts on the Moon by 2030. They won’t. SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry. Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words.Advertisement — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025 Artemis came from the first Trump administration’s 2017 Space Policy Directive 1, which directed NASA to return humans to the Moon. The program picked up pace through the 2020s, with the Orion spacecraft and SLS taking years to develop at enormous costs. SpaceX entered the picture in 2021 as the chosen lander contractor, tying the commercial space sector into what had historically been an all government undertaking. Whether SpaceX’s Starship ultimately carries astronauts to the lunar surface or shares that role with Blue Origin’s competing lander, this week’s Artemis II launch is the necessary first step. Getting four humans to the Moon’s vicinity and back safely is the proof of concept everything else depends on. Advertisement Before SpaceX’s Starship Human Landing System (HLS) can put anyone on the Moon, it has to solve a problem no rocket has demonstrated at scale, which is refueling in orbit. Because the Starship HLS requires approximately ten tanker launches worth of propellant loaded into a depot in low Earth orbit before it has enough fuel to reach the lunar surface, SpaceX plans to conduct this refueling process using its upgraded V3 Starship. And until that demonstration flies and succeeds, the Starship moon lander remains a question mark.Advertisement SpaceX’s Starship V3 is almost ready and it will change space travel forever In February 2026, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman confirmed that Artemis III, now planned for mid-2027, and will instead test lunar landers in low Earth orbit, with the actual landing pushed to Artemis IV that’s targeted for 2028. Musk responded to earlier criticism of SpaceX’s schedule by posting on X that his company is “moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry,” and added that “Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission.” The contract competition was also reopened in October 2025 by then NASA chief Sean Duffy, who cited Starship’s delays and said the agency needed speed given China’s own stated goal of landing astronauts on the Moon by 2030. They won’t. SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry. Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words.Advertisement — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025 Artemis came from the first Trump administration’s 2017 Space Policy Directive 1, which directed NASA to return humans to the Moon. The program picked up pace through the 2020s, with the Orion spacecraft and SLS taking years to develop at enormous costs. SpaceX entered the picture in 2021 as the chosen lander contractor, tying the commercial space sector into what had historically been an all government undertaking. Whether SpaceX’s Starship ultimately carries astronauts to the lunar surface or shares that role with Blue Origin’s competing lander, this week’s Artemis II launch is the necessary first step. Getting four humans to the Moon’s vicinity and back safely is the proof of concept everything else depends on. Advertisement SpaceX’s Starship V3 is almost ready and it will change space travel forever In February 2026, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman confirmed that Artemis III, now planned for mid-2027, and will instead test lunar landers in low Earth orbit, with the actual landing pushed to Artemis IV that’s targeted for 2028. Musk responded to earlier criticism of SpaceX’s schedule by posting on X that his company is “moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry,” and added that “Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission.” The contract competition was also reopened in October 2025 by then NASA chief Sean Duffy, who cited Starship’s delays and said the agency needed speed given China’s own stated goal of landing astronauts on the Moon by 2030. They won’t. SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry. Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words.Advertisement — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025 Artemis came from the first Trump administration’s 2017 Space Policy Directive 1, which directed NASA to return humans to the Moon. The program picked up pace through the 2020s, with the Orion spacecraft and SLS taking years to develop at enormous costs. SpaceX entered the picture in 2021 as the chosen lander contractor, tying the commercial space sector into what had historically been an all government undertaking. Whether SpaceX’s Starship ultimately carries astronauts to the lunar surface or shares that role with Blue Origin’s competing lander, this week’s Artemis II launch is the necessary first step. Getting four humans to the Moon’s vicinity and back safely is the proof of concept everything else depends on. Advertisement In February 2026, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman confirmed that Artemis III, now planned for mid-2027, and will instead test lunar landers in low Earth orbit, with the actual landing pushed to Artemis IV that’s targeted for 2028. Musk responded to earlier criticism of SpaceX’s schedule by posting on X that his company is “moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry,” and added that “Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission.” The contract competition was also reopened in October 2025 by then NASA chief Sean Duffy, who cited Starship’s delays and said the agency needed speed given China’s own stated goal of landing astronauts on the Moon by 2030. They won’t. SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry. Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words.Advertisement — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025 Artemis came from the first Trump administration’s 2017 Space Policy Directive 1, which directed NASA to return humans to the Moon. The program picked up pace through the 2020s, with the Orion spacecraft and SLS taking years to develop at enormous costs. SpaceX entered the picture in 2021 as the chosen lander contractor, tying the commercial space sector into what had historically been an all government undertaking. Whether SpaceX’s Starship ultimately carries astronauts to the lunar surface or shares that role with Blue Origin’s competing lander, this week’s Artemis II launch is the necessary first step. Getting four humans to the Moon’s vicinity and back safely is the proof of concept everything else depends on. Advertisement Musk responded to earlier criticism of SpaceX’s schedule by posting on X that his company is “moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry,” and added that “Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission.” The contract competition was also reopened in October 2025 by then NASA chief Sean Duffy, who cited Starship’s delays and said the agency needed speed given China’s own stated goal of landing astronauts on the Moon by 2030. They won’t. SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry. Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words.Advertisement — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025 Artemis came from the first Trump administration’s 2017 Space Policy Directive 1, which directed NASA to return humans to the Moon. The program picked up pace through the 2020s, with the Orion spacecraft and SLS taking years to develop at enormous costs. SpaceX entered the picture in 2021 as the chosen lander contractor, tying the commercial space sector into what had historically been an all government undertaking. Whether SpaceX’s Starship ultimately carries astronauts to the lunar surface or shares that role with Blue Origin’s competing lander, this week’s Artemis II launch is the necessary first step. Getting four humans to the Moon’s vicinity and back safely is the proof of concept everything else depends on. Advertisement They won’t. SpaceX is moving like lightning compared to the rest of the space industry. Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words.Advertisement — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025 Moreover, Starship will end up doing the whole Moon mission. Mark my words.Advertisement — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025 — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025 Artemis came from the first Trump administration’s 2017 Space Policy Directive 1, which directed NASA to return humans to the Moon. The program picked up pace through the 2020s, with the Orion spacecraft and SLS taking years to develop at enormous costs. SpaceX entered the picture in 2021 as the chosen lander contractor, tying the commercial space sector into what had historically been an all government undertaking. Whether SpaceX’s Starship ultimately carries astronauts to the lunar surface or shares that role with Blue Origin’s competing lander, this week’s Artemis II launch is the necessary first step. Getting four humans to the Moon’s vicinity and back safely is the proof of concept everything else depends on. Advertisement Whether SpaceX’s Starship ultimately carries astronauts to the lunar surface or shares that role with Blue Origin’s competing lander, this week’s Artemis II launch is the necessary first step. Getting four humans to the Moon’s vicinity and back safely is the proof of concept everything else depends on. Advertisement How to give your Tesla a Custom Lovk Sound! Easy tutorial!! #tesla #teslatok #teslalocksound Copyright © TESLARATI. All rights reserved.

Sign Up! envelope_alt Get the latest Android News in your inbox every day arrow_right Sign up to receive the latest Android News every weekday: Only send updates once a week Android Headlines / Mobile Events News / CES / CES 2026 Showcases Emotionally Intelligent Robots for All Age Groups Mind With Heart Robotics Co., Ltd. has showcased its new emotionally intelligent robots at the CES 2026. The robots are designed to complement and support both the elders and the children. It uses artificial intelligence and clinically backed algorithms to adapt naturally to the user. The Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2026 is going on full swing, and now, Mind With Heart Robotics Co., Ltd. has unveiled a broad portfolio of emotionally intelligent robots at the show. These robots are designed to meet the emotional and therapeutic needs of individuals across various age groups. The company showcases their robots’ natural movement, tactile interaction, and affective intelligence that adapts over time. The tech giant says that its emotionally intelligent robots are designed for both older people’s companionship and pediatric therapy. It shows how social robotics is moving toward clinically informed, human-centered design at a global scale for future care ecosystems worldwide. Robots are no longer limited to just mechanical and work-related tasks. The lineup is a result of years of research in affective computing and human-robot interaction led by founder and CEO Zhang Jiaming. The CEO has more than a decade of experience in the field. He has also overseen dozens of robotic systems and filed extensive patents in biomimetic design and emotional AI. With such extensive experience and knowledge, he designed the robots that read touch, voice, and behavior patterns and can also respond with lifelike motion. Further, it also keeps clinical collaboration and data ethics in mind for long-term safety and accuracy. The best part about the robots is that they can adapt to sensitive care settings in homes, hospitals, and schools across different global markets today. The main highlight of the show was the new An’An panda cub robot. It was also honored by the Consumer Technology Association with the CES Innovation Awards in artificial intelligence. It is designed specifically for loneliness and the care of old-aged people. The robot uses full-body tactile sensing and long-term memory to personalize interaction. Alongside An’An, the firm showcased its Duncan Series companion robots. These are meant for pediatric therapy, including support for children with autism and sensory challenges. The lineup is made while keeping skill-spanning communication, social interaction, motor development, play, and emotional well-being in mind. Mind With Heart Robotics says that they’re planning for a commercial release of all the robots in March. The products would be accessible at a worldwide scale across consumer, healthcare, and institutional markets. I am an experienced consumer tech writer dedicated to producing comprehensive guides and news that empower readers. My passion for technology drives me, and you can often find me exploring Tech Twitter. Feel free to reach out to me at: [email protected]. Copyright ©2026 Android Headlines. All Rights Reserved. Main Deals & More Android News Sign Up! envelope_alt Get the latest Android News in your inbox every day arrow_right Sign up to receive the latest Android News every weekday: Only send updates once a week

Switch between CA and NY editions here. A McDonald’s in a Chinese city welcome humanoid robots to serve up meals and entertain customers — but only for a limited time. Videos posted on social media captured the myriad of lifelike robots at a McDonald’s in Shanghai performing routine tasks typically completed by human workers, such as greeting customers and delivering food. Diners were seen interacting with the robots dressed in the fast-food joint’s iconic red-and-yellow uniforms behind counters, while children chased more of the moving machinery disguised as cute animals. The robots, supplied by Chinese firm Keenon Robotics, were deployed as part of a trial at the McDonald’s location, Digitaltrends reported. McDonald’s said the robots were only around for five days — from March 14 to the 19 — and were meant to plug the grand opening of the Shanghai Science and Technology Museum restaurant. “Our Humanoid series are leading the squad and hitting the streets,” Keenon Robotics posted on social media alongside a clip of the robots interacting with diners. “It’s a showcase of how service automation is becoming a seamless part of global dining, and how technology brings more smiles to every mealtime,” the company added. Jon Banner, the executive vice president and global chief impact officer of the beloved fast-food giant, tweeted that the robots were there for a “temporary greeting.” “Mission accomplished!” he said. “The robots were not involved in any service or operational functions. And if you didn’t visit prior to today, you missed them.” The footage comes amid concerns over artificial intelligence and robots replacing tasks typically completed by human workers at large corporations. In July, the Wall Street Journal reported that Amazon will soon use more robots in its warehouses than human employees, with more than 1 million machines already deployed across facilities. Many of these robots handle the heavy lifting in warehouse work, picking items from tall shelves and moving goods around facilities. Others are advanced enough to help humans sort and package orders, according to the Wall Street Journal. Three-quarters of Amazon’s global deliveries are now assisted by robots in some way, according to the company.

Nel settore della robotica domestica, i video dimostrativi sono ormai una sorta di tradizione. Tra le aziende più attive in tal senso c’è Figure AI. Quest’ultima, infatti, ha attirato molta attenzione grazie ai suoi robot umanoidi progettati per lavorare con gli esseri umani. L’ultimo protagonista di tali dimostrazioni è Figure 03. Si tratta di un modello pensato per affrontare attività domestiche. Il nuovo video pubblicato dall’azienda mostra il robot impegnato in una piccola routine casalinga. Si muove tra mobili e oggetti raccogliendo giocattoli lasciati sul pavimento, sistema i cuscini del divano e passa un panno su alcune superfici per pulirle. Scene simili potrebbero sembrare quasi banali, ma proprio la loro normalità è ciò che rende interessante la dimostrazione. L’obiettivo non è stupire con movimenti spettacolari, ma dimostrare che un robot può interagire con un ambiente domestico reale, dove nulla è perfettamente ordinato. Non è la prima volta che l’azienda mostra le capacità dei suoi robot. Già in passato il precedente modello, Figure 02, aveva dato prova di una notevole abilità nella manipolazione degli oggetti. In alcune dimostrazioni lo si vedeva selezionare capi di abbigliamento o organizzare oggetti con movimenti precisi. Con il nuovo robot l’attenzione sembra spostarsi ancora di più sulla gestione di situazioni domestiche meno prevedibili. Alla base di tali capacità c’è il sistema AI sviluppato dall’azienda, chiamato Helix 02. Tale piattaforma integra diversi elementi fondamentali per la robotica moderna. Tra cui la visione artificiale per riconoscere oggetti e ambienti, la comprensione del linguaggio per interpretare istruzioni. A ciò si aggiunge anche una componente di pianificazione che traduce le informazioni raccolte in azioni concrete. Un dettaglio interessante riguarda la velocità del robot. Osservando il video, si nota che i movimenti sono ancora più lenti rispetto a quelli di una persona. Non si tratta di un limite tecnologico, ma una scelta legata alla sicurezza. In un ambiente domestico, dove il robot potrebbe trovarsi vicino a persone o animali, mantenere movimenti controllati e prevedibili riduce i rischi. Nonostante i progressi mostrati nel video, Figure AI non ha ancora annunciato quando robot come Figure 03 potrebbero arrivare sul mercato. Prima di una commercializzazione sarà necessario raccogliere grandi quantità di dati e dimostrare che il sistema può funzionare in modo affidabile. Ciao sono Margareth, per gli amici Maggie, la vostra amichevole web writer di quartiere. Questa piccola citazione dice già tanto di me: amo il cinema, le serie tv, leggere e cantare a squarciagola i musical a teatro. Se a questo aggiungiamo la passione per la fotografia e la tecnologia direi che è facile intuire perché ho deciso di studiare e poi lavorare con la comunicazione. 2012 – 2026 Tecnoandroid.it – Gestito dalla STARGATE SRLS – P.Iva: 15525681001 Testata telematica quotidiana registrata al Tribunale di Roma CON DECRETO N° 225/2015, editore STARGATE SRLS. Tutti i marchi riportati appartengono ai legittimi proprietari. Questo articolo potrebbe includere collegamenti affiliati: eventuali acquisti o ordini realizzati attraverso questi link contribuiranno a fornire una commissione al nostro sito. 🔥 Non perderti nemmeno un'offerta Smartphone, notebook, gadget tech al prezzo più basso. Unisciti a migliaia di lettori di TecnoAndroid! Puoi disiscriverti in qualsiasi momento. Niente spam, solo offerte vere. 🎯 Inserisci qualcosa di speciale: Tienimi connesso fino a quando non esco Password dimenticata? Ti sarà inviata una nuova password via email. Hai ricevuto una nuova password? Accedi qui.

In this article The White House hosted its "first humanoid robot guest" on Wednesday, with first lady Melania Trump appearing alongside a robot from robotics upstart Figure AI. The robot, identified as Figure 3, accompanied the first lady during the second day of the Fostering the Future Together Global Coalition Summit, a gathering focused on technology and children's education. The machine greeted attendees in multiple languages and described itself as "a humanoid built in the United States of America," according to widely circulated footage from the event. The display represented one of, if not the, highest-profile showcases of humanoid robotics in the U.S. to date and highlights how the tech is becoming a national priority amid global tech competition. Beijing has also promoted humanoid robots at highly publicized events this year. The first lady used the robot to promote her push for artificial intelligence in children's education, suggesting that the robots could one day act as interactive educators at home. However, Figure AI says its third-generation humanoids are also applicable for more general purposes, including commercial and household tasks. The White House spotlight is likely to boost the brand of Nvidia-backed Figure AI, a lesser-known robot company compared to larger humanoid players like Tesla's Optimus and Boston Dynamics, though some of its team comes from those competitors, as well as tech giants like Apple. Figure AI was founded in 2022 by Brett Adcock, a tech entrepreneur and billionaire who previously co-founded the publicly traded aerospace company Archer Aviation and a digital hiring marketplace Vettery. Powering its robots is the firm's in-house Helix AI system, a vision-language-action model that powers its robots and enables learning through observation and verbal commands. Amid growing investor excitement for physical AI, the firm raised more than $1 billion in its Series C funding round in September led by Parkway Venture Capital with participation from other notable investors such as Nvidia, Intel Capital, Qualcomm Ventures and Salesforce. That gave it a post-money valuation of $39 billion. The fundraising is expected to be put towards the firm's aim to deploy thousands of robots in homes and logistics over the coming years — a goal that has likely been made easier by a major endorsement from the White House. Figure AI has already begun work with its first commercial customer in BMW, deploying its robots for tasks like handling sheet metal parts in manufacturing facilities. It's possible that Melania's endorsement of Figure AI's robots as potential educators will trigger a reexamination of an ongoing lawsuit the company found itself in last year. In November, Figure AI was sued by its former head of product safety, who alleged he was fired after warning executives that the company's robots were powerful enough to fracture a human skull. Robert Gruendel filed the complaint in federal court in California, claiming wrongful termination after raising safety concerns with CEO Brett Adcock and chief engineer Kyle Edelberg in September 2025. The suit stated that Figure AI's next-generation robots moved at superhuman speed and generated force approximately twice the level necessary to fracture an adult human skull. Gruendel also alleged that one robot had carved a gash into a steel refrigerator door during a malfunction. Figure AI contends that Gruendel had been fired for poor performance, and described the allegations as "falsehoods." Figure AI countersued in January, saying Gruendel failed in his role to help the company build a safe robot. The lawsuit drew attention to broader questions about safety standards in humanoid robotics development and remains pending. Interestingly, the White House event on Wednesday wasn't the first time that a company connected to Adcock received some major shine from the Trump administration. Shares of the aerospace company he co-founded, Archer Aviation, surged in June last year after U.S. President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order directing the establishment of a program to promote the safe integration of electric air taxis in U.S. cities. Archer is participating in the initiative and is working on projects involving aircraft demonstrations. Following the June 2025 executive order, Archer raised $850 million in a registered direct stock offering. Adcock co-founded Archer Aviation in 2018 with Adam Goldstein and initially served as co-CEO. However, Adcock stepped down in April 2022, and then resigned from the company's board of directors shortly afterward. He remains a shareholder, according to investment research platform Business Quant, but he has no active executive, board, or advisory position at the company. Correction: This story has been updated to reflect that Archer Aviation is an aerospace company. An earlier version of the story gave an incorrect description of the firm's business. Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you. Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inbox Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services. © 2026 Versant Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. A Versant Media Company. Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis. Data also provided by

Advertisement Humanoid robots are machines designed to resemble the human body and replicate some humanlike abilities. Engineers in humanoid robotics build machines with arms, legs, and sensors that allow them to perform tasks in environments built for human beings. Unlike many traditional industrial robots used in factories, humanoid robots aim to work alongside humans in real world settings. Their humanlike structure helps them open doors, use tools, and interact with human operators. Advertisement Rapid advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robot hardware are pushing these systems from science fiction into reality. Researchers now test advanced humanoid robot platforms in homes, workplaces and public spaces. Most humanoid robots copy the basic body plan of their human counterparts. Engineers design them with a torso, head, robotic arms, and bipedal robots legs that allow humanlike movements. Complex mechanical components and motors give these machines many degrees of freedom, meaning they can move joints in multiple directions. This flexibility helps robots perform complex tasks that require human dexterity. Advertisement Sensors such as cameras, tactile sensing systems and force/torque sensors allow a robot to detect objects, adjust its grip, and maintain balance in complex environments. Modern humanoid robot designed systems rely heavily on artificial intelligence. AI models help robots understand surroundings, track objects, and plan actions. Developers train AI models using machine learning techniques such as imitation learning and reinforcement learning. These methods allow robots to learn new skills by observing humans or experimenting with actions. Advertisement Data pipelines and control systems process information from sensors so the robot can react in real time. This tracking ability helps humanoid robots navigate unstructured environments and maintain safe human robot interaction. Several companies and research groups are developing humanoid robotics platforms. Boston Dynamics has explored agile robots capable of moving through difficult terrain. Agility Robotics created Digit robots designed for tasks such as carrying packages and moving totes in warehouses. Pal Robotics builds humanoid service robot systems used as development platforms for research. Advertisement Other humanoid robots come from companies such as SoftBank Robotics, Hanson Robotics, and Engineered Arts. These machines often focus on social robot roles, customer service roles, or public demonstrations that showcase facial expressions and communication abilities. Humanoid robots can perform some manual tasks that once required human workers. Robotic arms and motor control allow some humanoid robots to manipulate tools or handle objects. Developers are training robots to help with household tasks such as cleaning or organizing items. In industrial settings, autonomous robots may assist humans with assembling parts, transporting materials, or monitoring equipment. Advertisement Some robots can also be controlled remotely using remote control systems. Human operators guide the machine while the robot provides mobility and strength in dangerous or distant environments. Many experts believe the first wave of humanoid robots will appear in workplaces where labor shortages exist. These robots may help complete repetitive or physically demanding tasks while working alongside humans. Researchers continue improving balance, autonomous navigation, and humanlike motion so robots can operate in various environments. Advances in greater dexterity and machine perception may allow robots to interact more naturally with people. Advertisement While fully autonomous humanoid machines remain in early stages, ongoing research described in publications such as IEEE Spectrum shows steady progress. As artificial intelligence improves, humanoid robots may become capable assistants in homes, hospitals and workplaces across the world. We created this article in conjunction with AI technology, then made sure it was fact-checked and edited by a HowStuffWorks editor. Advertisement Please copy/paste the following text to properly cite this HowStuffWorks.com article: Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement

Brett Adcock has built and sold companies in robotics, security and air taxis, and now he wants to reinvent how people use A.I. His latest venture, Hark, is a new lab that pairs personalized intelligence with custom-built hardware. Instead of specializing in models or devices alone, Hark aims to own the whole pipeline—foundation models, software systems, hardware and user interfaces—under one roof. The company has recruited top talent from Apple and Meta to build an A.I. product that better bridges the gap between humans and machines. Thank you for signing up! By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime. “The A.I. systems I use today are far from my vision of what the future should be,” said Adcock in a statement. “We want to create intelligence that lets you offload your mental workload into a system that begins to think like you and sometimes ahead of you.” Hark is the latest in a string of ambitious projects launched by Adcock. He previously funded the hiring marketplace Vettery; Archer, which builds electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft (eVTOLs); and Cover, an A.I. security company developing weapon-detection systems. Hadcock also remains CEO of Figure, a robotics startup he founded in 2022 that is developing humanoid robots to automate labor. Figure, which is testing A.I. agents on its robots but will remain a separate company from Hark, was most recently valued at $39 billion in 2025. For now, Hark is financed entirely by Adcock’s own money: $100 million in personal capital. The entrepreneur, who has an estimated net worth of $19.1 billion, wants to build multimodal A.I. systems that handle speech, text, vision and context, layered with personalized memory, proactive behavior and real-time speech capabilities. Those systems are meant to work hand in hand with Hark’s own hardware. Leading that effort is Abidur Chowdhury, hired as head of design after seven years as an industrial designer at Apple, where he worked on iPhone and Mac products such as the recent iPhone Air. “We believe that the future is a new interface that will understand you, intelligently anticipate your needs, and love doing tasks that you don’t want to do,” said Chowdhury in a statement. Hark’s broader team includes A.I. researchers and engineers drawn from some of Silicon Valley’s biggest firms. On the hardware side, hires include longtime Apple staffers like David Narajowski and Dave Wilkes, who worked on product development architecture and audio hardware systems. On the A.I. side, the company has brought in senior researchers from Meta’s Superintelligence Lab, including Mingbo Ma, Xubo Liu, Xianfeng Rui, Kainan Peng and Zhihong Lei. Hark’s headcount, which also includes talent from Google, Amazon and Tesla, is about 45 today and is expected to reach 100 in the first half of 2026. To speed up model development, Hark has struck a compute deal with Nvidia that will bring thousands of GPUs online next month for pre-training and post-training its systems. Hark is entering a crowded field of ventures trying to rethink how people interact with A.I. OpenAI has enlisted former Apple design chief Jony Ive for a still-secret device project, while Meta is betting heavily on A.I.-enabled smart glasses. Newer hardware startups like Sandbar have raised millions to develop wearables with personalized A.I. at their core. Adcock says Hark will begin releasing its first A.I. models this summer, followed shortly by hardware devices designed around those systems. “We believe the next computing platform will be personal A.I.—intelligence that understands you and works alongside you every day,” he said. “But that future only becomes possible when the entire stack is built together.” We get it: you like to have control of your own internet experience. But advertising revenue helps support our journalism. To read our full stories, please turn off your ad blocker.We'd really appreciate it. Below are steps you can take in order to whitelist Observer.com on your browser: Click the AdBlock button on your browser and select Don't run on pages on this domain. Click the AdBlock Plus button on your browser and select Enabled on this site. Click the AdBlock Plus button on your browser and select Disable on Observer.com.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Advertisement Nature Communications volume 17, Article number: 2455 (2026) Cite this article 6026 Accesses 7 Altmetric Metrics details Softening and onboarding computers and controllers is one of the final frontiers in soft robotics towards their robustness and intelligence for everyday use. In this regard, embodying soft and physical computing presents exciting potential. Physical computing seeks to encode inputs into a mechanical computing kernel and leverage the internal interactions among this kernel’s constituent elements to compute the output. Moreover, such input-to-output evolution can be re-programmable. This perspective paper proposes a framework for embodying physical computing into soft robots and discusses three unique strategies in the literature: analog oscillators, physical reservoir computing, and physical algorithmic computing. These embodied computers enable the soft robot to perform complex behaviors that would otherwise require CMOS-based electronics — including coordinated locomotion with obstacle avoidance, payload weight and orientation classification, and programmable operation based on logical rules. This paper will detail the working principles of these embodied physical computing methods, survey the current state-of-the-art, and present a perspective for future development. The dream of creating entirely soft, versatile, and capable robots—akin to the octopus—has long inspired scientists and engineers. We have witnessed significant progress in soft actuation1,2, sensing3, and power4, enabling these robots to operate in a wide range of challenging environments, from deep within our own bodies5 to the far bottom of the Mariana trench6. Yet, softening and onboarding computers and controllers remain a major challenge and present one of the final frontiers towards robust and intelligent soft robots suitable for everyday use. In this regard, roboticists have long recognized that the inherent material softness can facilitate and simplify control, and many innovative strategies have been explored. For example, soft and rotating legs can naturally accommodate uneven surfaces and large obstacles, allowing the robot to traverse challenging terrains without complex controls like in the quadrupeds7. Soft curling tentacles can wrap and entangle themselves around objects with widely different shapes, thus manipulating them with a simple global pressure input8. Such softness-facilitated control is sometimes referred to as “intelligence by mechanics”9 or “morphological computation”10,11. They offer exciting potential, but frequently lack the sophistication and (re-) programmability available from the more universal controllers based on digital computation. In parallel with the advancements in soft robotics (and partly inspired by the need for soft robotic computing and control), there is also growing interest in CMOS-free physical computers12,13,14,15,16. This emerging paradigm seeks to encode physical inputs into a mechanical construct (or kernel)—for example, in the form of deformation17,18,19,20,21, fluid flow22,23, thermal heat flux24, or waves25,26,27,28,29—and leverage the internal interactions among the kernel’s constituent elements to process these inputs according to a programmed evolution. The resulting output typically remains in the same physical domain as the input so that it can be easily decoded and interpreted. The paths to physical computing are diverse: one can use acoustic waves to solve differential equations28,30, re-purpose mechanical vibrations like neuron signals to perform machine learning tasks10,31,32, or construct mechanical logic gates and physical circuitry to perform algorithmic operations33. Overall, the idea of performing computation without CMOS electronics could benefit us with higher energy efficiency34, parallelization25, and resiliency against adversarial working conditions. Therefore, there is a tremendous opportunity to introduce physical computing into the field of soft robotics. That is, one could construct a physical computer out of soft materials and integrate it with soft sensors and actuators. Such integration can lead to a new class of entirely soft computation and control methods with flexibility, robustness, and programmability for more sophisticated tasks. As a result, we have witnessed a rapid emergence of soft robots with integrated and embodied physical computers over the past several years. And these physically computing robots have become an important part of recent reviews that offer a birds-eye overview on embodied intelligence (or mechanical intelligence, physical control) in robotics35,36,37,38. On the other hand, we believe a separate, deeper dive into physical computing in soft robots can benefit the research community. Specifically, we aim to define physical computing using a rigorous framework, including encoding, decoding, and a (re-)programmable computing kernel, and build upon this definition to categorize physical computing into two distinct types: analog and algorithmic (more in the following Section “what is physical computing (and what is not)?”). In this way, we can dissect and re-examine soft robotics through a different lens. We will also have a more systematic framework to introduce new physical computing concepts from other disciplines to robotics. Therefore, this perspective paper will first establish a more formal framework for physical computing, then survey the different analog and algorithmic computers implemented in the soft robots, and discuss challenges and future directions in the end. Before surveying soft robots with embodied computing, we should first clarify the definition of a physical computer. In the robotics literature, the scope of “computing” and “intelligence” has been quite broad and occasionally conflicting. We certainly do not intend to propose a new definition that everyone would agree upon. Instead, we would like to highlight a few key ingredients of the physical computer to anchor the scope of this particular paper. To this end, we propose that physical computing should involve two domains: one is the agents using the computer. They could be a human operator, but in this study, they typically refer to the non-computing parts of a soft robot, including sensors, actuators, and power supply. The agents will have an “input” that they wish to use, and expect an “output” from the computing. The second domain is the kernel, where the physical interaction between its constituent components embodies the computing program. Under this formalism, a complete physical computer should (1) have a mechanism to encode inputs from the agents into the computing kernel and decode the outputs correspondingly, and (2) have a mechanism to program (i.e., design and configure) the evolution from the input to the output in the computing kernel (Fig. 1a). a The computing architecture adapted in this perspective includes input encoding, output decoding, and programmable input-output evolution. b Analog computing: the harmonic analyzer is an elegant example of analog computing from the 1800s (photo credit to the Nimitz Library, United States Naval Academy). In the modern electronic computing paradigm, artificial neural networks also operate on analog (continuous) data. We will discuss two types of physical analog computing in soft robots: oscillator and reservoir. For example, an electronics-free legged robot uses an analog oscillator to walk70 (photo credit to David Baillot, Jacobs School of Engineering, UC San Diego), and a modular manipulator uses embodied reservoir computing to classify payloads (image adapted from ref. 145 CC BY 4.0). c Algorithmic computing: the difference machine is one of the first algorithmic computers (photo credits to Science Museum London, CC Attribution-SA 2.0). Modern CMOS-based computers are built exclusively on algorithmic Boolean logic. Here, we survey how mechanical logic is implemented in soft robots. For example, a robotic hand operates with fluidic logic control (image adapted from ref. 112 CC BY 4.0). Therefore, in this paper, computing does not exist without encoding, decoding, and programming39. Under this formalism, some nonconventional and innovative computing paradigms in the robotics field, such as the aforementioned “morphological computation,” are beyond our scope. Morphological computation generally refers to the idea that a robot body’s shape, deformation, and dynamics can perform part of the “computation” needed for control. Under this paradigm, “computation” can be quite diverse—it can be storing and releasing energy periodically to stabilize locomotion (e.g., passive walker40), or conforming to complex objects to assist manipulation (e.g., vacuum jamming gripper41), or pre-processing sensory data to assist perception (e.g., bat ear that mechanically process the incoming sound waves to assist object localization42). Therefore, the physical computing defined in this paper can be an example of morphological computation, but it has a more structured definition. That is, many morphological computation examples will not be considered as physically computing in this paper because they do not have the “encoding-kernel evolution-decoding” architecture, and they are not reprogrammable. On the other hand, a mechanical construct—e.g., architected materials or soft robotic body—that can incorporate encoding, decoding, and programming would meet the necessary condition to function as a physical computer. Moreover, based on these definitions, we will adopt the theory from Jaeger et al., and categorize physical computers into two sets (Fig. 1b)43,44. One is analog, where input and output signals are continuous, and the evolution from input to output is governed by smooth (and frequently physics-based) functions. Albert Michelson’s harmonic analyzer45 and our human neural system are classical examples of analog computers. In soft robots, this can be accomplished by exploiting their bodies’ nonlinear dynamic responses for physical reservoir computing (PRC). The other type of physical computer is the algorithmic, where the input and output take a discrete format, and the evolution from input to output is programmed via a set of abstract logical rules. Charles Babbage’s difference machine46 and our omnipresent CMOS-based computing chips are classical examples of an algorithmic computer. In soft robots, this can be accomplished by, for example, an assembly of mechanical Boolean gates featuring elastic bistability (i.e., mechanical logic gates). Table 1 summaries and compares the different computing approaches from this perspective. It is worth highlighting that many soft robots use responsive materials to interact with their surrounding environment and achieve adaptive behaviors. However, they do not necessarily compute according to the above-mentioned definition. Materials are considered “responsive” or “active” if they can change their shape or constitutive properties in response to external stimuli, such as temperature47, heat flux48, electric field49, magnetic field47,50, light48,51, and humidity52. They were initially introduced to soft robotics as artificial muscles. Shape memory alloys (SMAs) have been widely utilized in soft robotics since their inception53. Dielectric elastomer is another example54, and some liquid format dielectric materials can generate very high output forces to create jellyfish-like soft robots49. A programmable electrothermal actuator using silver nanowires (AgNW) can enable a robot to crawl55. One can also harvest responsive materials from nature, such as the self-drilling seed carrier made from white oak tissue, which can autonomously burrow by exploiting ambient humidity cycles52. (Interested readers can refer to the excellent reviews in refs. 56,57 for a comprehensive survey of responsive materials used for robotic actuation.) As responsive materials continue to evolve, researchers are beginning to explore how they can be strategically embedded in soft robotic bodies to facilitate and simplify control. For example, untethered robots with responsive materials can achieve simple and remote operation58, thereby reducing the associated control and computational complexity. Examples like this include miniature magnetic shape-programmable robots47,50, m-PDMS (magnetic particle-doped polydimethylsiloxane) robots59,60,61, photoresponsive LCE robots51, and piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) robots62. By integrating different types of responsive materials in one body, simple computational capabilities48,63 can be achieved (e.g., a soft robot that turns toward light only if heat is also present). However, although these responsive materials can enable complex tasks without sophisticated controllers (which suggests some intelligence in the mechanical domain, or mechano-intelligence64,65), they are not considered computing in this study due to a lack of clear mechanisms for input encoding, output decoding, and programmable input-output evolution. Instead, responsive materials can serve as the building blocks of physical computing, and we hope this will become clear as we survey soft robots with physical computing in the following sections. Rhythmic motions here refer to periodic changes in the shape or configuration of a soft structure over time. They are omnipresent in the animal kingdom, such as breathing, heart beating, and in particular, locomotions like walking, swimming, and wing flapping66. The underpinning mechanisms to generate rhythmic motions are diverse and still active topics of research. Among them, the central pattern generator (CPG) is a unique mechanism that can be considered as a physical computer and thus directly relates to this study. CPG is a self-organized neural circuit that produces rhythmic output from a simple, nonrhythmic input, and the input-output evolution is programmed by the neural circuit’s architecture. The CPG makes it possible to achieve and reconfigure complex locomotion gaits with minimal involvement from the brain or local sensory feedback67,68. The striking simplicity and capability of the CPG have inspired similar implementations in soft and continuous robots, where an analog oscillator—either electric or mechanical—is integrated to generate rhythmic deformation from a simple (and typically constant) input to drive locomotion69. Although many of these oscillators are not as complex as CPG’s neural circuit, their underlying computing principle are similar. An example of analog oscillator applied to soft robots: in the quadruped robot shown in Fig. 2a, rhythmic and coordinated leg swing motions are generated by an entirely pneumatic ring oscillator70. More specifically: Input encoding: in this robot, a small pressure tank supplies a constant pressure (P+) to drive the analog oscillator. Kernel: the oscillator circuit is the kernel. The three soft valves inside this circuit serve as inverters with a built-in delay, and a snap-through membrane alternates between closed and open flow paths, allowing the high-pressure flow to advance around the ring. This mechanism essentially transforms the steady input into a phase-shifted sequence of pressure pulses at the three nodes. Output decoding: the pulsed output pneumatic pressure from the oscillator flows to the corresponding soft legs, which convert the pressure inflation into mechanical swing motions for walking. Re-programming: in addition, a soft bistable valve and tethered mechanical controller are added to swap two connections like a latching switch, so triggering the valve can reverse the output pressure pulse sequence, thus reversing the locomotion direction. a Electronics-free pneumatic control: a soft ring-oscillator circuit generates rhythmic leg actuation from a constant pressure input, enabling a quadruped to produce diagonal-couplet walking gaits. A bistable 4/2 switch selects gait direction, and dual oscillators set the phase between leg pairs (image adapted from ref. 70 with permission). b Controller-free SMA modular robot: a curved mono stable beam and a mechanical slider can convert a single DC power supply into sustained self-oscillation. And a bistable switch can alternate power supply between the front and back modules for out-of-phase deformation and crawling (adapted from75, CC BY 4.0). c Twisted LCE ribbon robot: the ambient heating drives continuous self-rolling of this robotic structure for locomotion. When the robot contacts an obstacle, it will store elastic energy and then snap to reverse its direction, enabling autonomous avoidance and maze escape (adapted from ref. 72, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Note that all scale bars are approximate. Besides the fluidic circuitry, analog oscillation can also be achieved using other physical principles and material selections (Fig. 2b, c). For example, one can exploit mechanical instabilities and clever geometric design to generate motion with a constant power input, as seen in twisted LCE ribbons and architected structures that exploit snapping or buckling for autonomous rolling or twisting71,72. Similarly, beetle-like robots use spiral-shaped PVDF materials to generate mechanical resonance and rhythmic motion for insect-scale and high-speed crawling62,73,74. One can also use thermal or mechanical loops—such as SMA-actuated systems with built-in mechanical switching or microfluidic logic circuits—to generate self-sustained rhythmic actuation without digital controllers75,76,77. Challenges and opportunities of analog oscillators: analog oscillators are simple yet robust. They can tightly integrate with the soft robot’s body to generate locomotion without additional electronics. However, analog oscillators can suffer from programmability and scalability constraints: their dynamics are hard-wired into physical design. That is, the oscillator geometry, mechanical architecture, and constitutive material properties fully determine the output frequency and phase pattern. As a result, “programming” the kernel’s input-output evolution might require re-design rather than a straightforward parameter tuning. In addition, as the number of oscillators increases, fabrication tolerances and material variability can introduce mismatches that degrade synchronization. One can address these limitations by integrating the oscillators with other, more easily programmable components (e.g., combining the oscillator with fluidic logic gates as we show later in Section “algorithmic physical computing and mechano-logic”) and using high-precision manufacturing techniques at the smaller physical scale (as we discuss later in Section “perspective for future advancement”). While an analog oscillator provides a promising alternative to micro-controllers for computing and generating rhythmic motions, its information processing capability is largely embedded in its physical architecture. Recent work has shown that architected mechanical and metamaterial-based systems can support multiple motion sequences through controlled switching of actuation frequency78,79,80, rather than through real-time algorithmic control. Nevertheless, the space of attainable behaviors in these systems remains discretely prescribed by design and reconfiguration pathways. In contrast, there is an emerging notion of informational embodiment, where the combinatorial richness of a soft robot’s body deformation encodes spatiotemporal patterns without relying on symbolic or centralized representations81. This concept bridges soft-body dynamics and computation, offering another pathway toward decentralized, analog computing. Aligned with this, PRC offers a rigorous framework to formalize the soft robotic body as a computing kernel. In PRC, the body functions as a nonlinear, high-dimensional, and transiently stable dynamical system that maps input streams into distinguishable physical states. In other words, the soft body serves as a “physical recurrent neural network,” and its rich dynamics can substitute the digital recurrent neural network for temporal information processing. As we discussed in Section “analog oscillators and rhythmic motion”, a physical system truly computes only when it is intentionally used to compute abstract functions through defined input encoding and output decoding11. PRC satisfies this criterion by treating the mechanical body as a fixed, task-agnostic kernel, with only the output readout layer trained—typically via linear regression10. Compared to traditional artificial neural networks, the simplicity of treating the physical body as the computing kernel offers significantly lower computational cost, reduced memory and energy demands, and fast training—enabling its deployment in computation-embodied autonomous systems82. There are two rigorously developed frameworks for using PRC kernels. They have been demonstrated in a damped-mass-spring network10,31, and they can guide the use of PRC in soft robots. The first framework is open-loop, in which the mechanical system acts as a fixed nonlinear kernel, and only a static linear readout is trained to process the temporal data streams10. The second framework is closed-loop, in which the reservoir’s outputs are fed back to the actuators to shape future inputs, thus stabilizing or switching physical computing under simple static feedback31. Building on these two frameworks, one can deploy the open-loop PRC into robots for information perception—i.e., extracting and decoding meaningful information from the high-dimensional body dynamics. On the other hand, the closed-loop PRC can be used for embodied control—i.e., routing the reservoir computing outputs as control commands to the actuators, thus producing and modulating rhythmic body motions. In the following two subsections, we detail the working principles and applications of these two frameworks. An example of open-loop reservoir applied to soft robots: the open-loop framework allows PRC to enhance the perception of soft robots by transforming their bodies into multi-modal computing sensors. A compelling demonstration of this is the modular manipulator equipped with SMA coil actuators and simple strain gauges83 (Fig. 3a). The manipulator’s nonlinear body dynamics serve directly as the source for PRC. More specifically: Input encoding: when the manipulator grasps and lifts different payloads, its SMA actuators generate pulsed forces to “wobble” the body slightly. Kernel: in this robot, the soft body itself is the kernel (or reservoir). As the SMA wobbles the manipulator and its payload, the resulting body vibration, denoted as si(t), is captured by the strain gauges. Such a vibrational response is rich and nonlinear, so its spatiotemporal feature contains information about the weight and orientation of the payloads. Output decoding: by performing a simple and analog weighted linear summation of these strain gauge readings (O(t) = w0 + ∑wisi(t)), the robot can directly estimate the payload weight and orientation, thus classifying them. Re-programming: the readout weights wi in the output layer are trained by regression methods, which can be adjusted according to the particular computing task at hand. This example clearly illustrates how the open-loop reservoir computing framework enables soft robots to conduct spatiotemporal filtering through their intrinsic deformation dynamics, allowing them to extract complex information without requiring dense sensor arrays or extensive digital processing. As a result, numerous studies have emerged utilizing different soft robotic platforms. For instance, a fabric-based soft manipulator can estimate joint bending angle and payload weight simultaneously using only a few distributed pressure sensors84. Contact dynamics in a soft arm allow for tactile sensing and object property estimation without electronic skins85. For environment monitoring, a brush-like flexible sensor encodes surface textures through passive contact86(Fig. 3b, up), while in aerial applications, a flapping-wing robot detects wind direction directly from wing deformation, eliminating the need for airflow sensors87(Fig. 3b, middle). A SMA reservoir88 demonstrates the capability of predicting the future trajectory of its end effector under various driving signals (Fig. 3b, bottom). Collectively, these demonstrations show that soft robots with sparse, low-dimensional sensors can nonetheless achieve high-dimensional perception by exploiting their own body as the physical reservoir—making PRC a minimalist yet powerful strategy for embodied sensing. a Open-loop PRC for information perception: a modular manipulator with embedded strain gauges is driven by SMA actuators. Its high-dimensional body dynamics (measured by the strain si(t)) serve as reservoir states, which can be processed with trained linear readout wi to decode and identify the payload (image adapted from ref. 83 with permission). b Other examples of information perception with open-loop PRC, including terrain classification(image adapted from ref. 86 CC BY-ND 4.0), wind detection on a compliant membrane wing (image adapted from87, CC BY 4.0), and a self-sensing shape memory alloy actuator that could predict its end effector trajectory (image adapted from88 with permission). c Closed-loop PRC for embodied control: a quadruped robot uses its compliant spine as the reservoir. The four outputs of the reservoir kernel are fed back to the leg actuators to generate robust and adaptable locomotion gaits (image adapted from ref. 89 with permission). d Other examples of control embodiments with closed-loop PRC, including manipulation with a multi-segment continuum arm (image adapted from ref. 91 with permission) and a surface-swimming robot (adapted from ref. 94, CC BY 4.0). Note that all scale bars are approximate. An example of closed-loop reservoir applied to soft robots: beyond information perception, PRC enables soft robots to autonomously generate periodic and robust motions by embedding control into their intrinsic body dynamics. That is, instead of connecting robotic actuators to external digital controllers, one can feed the body reservoir’s output back to these actuators for real-time motor behavior control. In this case, the deformation dynamics of the robotic body and its interaction with the environment play a critical role. A representative example is the quadruped robot with its flexible spine serving as the reservoir computing kernel89(Fig. 3c). More specifically, Kernel: in this robot, its flexible spine is the kernel (or reservoir). Its intrinsic body dynamics are rich and nonlinear, capable of projecting input signals into a high-dimensional state vector. Input encoding and output decoding: in this case, the linear readout layer performs weighted linear summations, mapping the internal force and strain of the flexible spine into four control commands, each for a motored leg. The readouts are first trained in an open-loop setup with teacher forcing. Once the training is complete, the loop is closed. As a result, the reservoir computer’s output is also the input, eventually creating a self-sustained locomotion gait. Re-programming: once the loop is closed, and the robot can perform trotting, bounding, or turning—with a strong ability to recover from disturbance—simply by switching the readout weights. This embodied controller demonstrates how PRC converts compliant mechanics into an energy-efficient control system: the body remains unchanged, only the readout is “programmed,” and feedback routes it from perception to action. This closed-loop, reservoir-enabled control principle has been successfully implemented across multiple platforms, including soft silicone arms90,91(Fig. 3d), tensegrity robots92, and origami-inspired machines93, all demonstrating motor primitives and robust dynamic behaviors. A pneumatic soft robotic arm, for instance, learns different end-effector trajectories and autonomously recovers from disturbances by exploiting its intrinsic dynamic richness91(Fig. 3d, up). More recently, soft robots have also been shown to switch behaviors under varying environmental conditions by using reservoir systems that simultaneously encode control and sensory feedback94(Fig. 3d, bottom). Collectively, these demonstrations show that PRC not only simplifies and stabilizes motion generation but also enables behavior switching through embodied computation, offering an energy-efficient alternative to conventional digital control architectures. Challenges and opportunities of analog physical reservoirs: PRC offers an appealing framework to embody computation directly into soft robotic systems. In this framework, one can directly “multipurpose" a soft robotic body into a reservoir without substantial redesign, and quickly switch the computing function by adjusting the readout weights. However, reservoir computing also faces several fundamental challenges. The first is repeatability. Real-world physical systems can not guarantee identical dynamic output across multiple experiments; slight variations in fabrication, boundary conditions, temperature, and material behavior, along with drift and aging, can shift the reservoir’s dynamic responses and degrade computing performance. A second challenge is noise, as real hardware inevitably introduces sensing and actuation noise that can be amplified by the reservoir’s nonlinear dynamics, leading to degraded or even unstable output. The third challenge involves scaling. One can always increase the number of reservoir states to improve performance, but it means more sensors, more wires, and heavier data-processing burdens. Possible improvements across these areas include better operating-point stabilization and calibration procedures, noise-aware training with improved sensing electronics, and more efficient sensing architectures or dimensionality-reduction strategies that capture the essential physical dynamics without overwhelming the hardware. These efforts collectively point toward more reliable, robust, and scalable PRC systems for soft robotics. Unlike analog computing, an algorithmic computer uses abstract logical rules to drive the input-output evolution. Correspondingly, their input and output signals are typically in a discrete format (e.g., binary 0–1, on-off, or true-false bits). Our omnipresent, CMOS-based digital computers are built almost exclusively on an algorithmic architecture, relying on binary data streams passing through nested Boolean logic gates to perform computations44. However, one can also achieve algorithmic computing without electronics14. That is, instead of electrons flowing through binary logic gates, one can construct binary components that operates with elastic deformations, fluid flows, or other physical stimuli. Each physical component can act as an equivalent to logic gates, memory cells, or timing elements to fulfill computation roles. Though fundamentally different in shape and format, the underlying goals of digital and physical algorithmic computers remain the same: to perform computation tasks by following programmed logical rules for information processing. It is worth highlighting the important role of bistable mechanisms in physical algorithmic computing because they can directly emulate the 0–1 binary states of CMOS electronics. Bi-stability—defined as a physical construct’s ability to settle into two distant stable equilibria without additional external aids—arises from material or geometric nonlinearities and can be implemented using curved elastic beams95,96, elastomeric membranes97,98, or origami folds12,99,100. A bistable mechanism naturally exhibits large and rapid deformation when it snaps between its stable equilibria101, thereby amplifying the actuation output and simplifying the control of the soft robot102. For example, snapping elastic caps convert slow inflation into explosive jumping103, bistable curved fins enable fast, high-efficiency swimming104. They can also help program the robotic deformation, like in the soft sheets with an array of snap-through domes105. A bistable mechanism can also perform sensing and, therefore, encode inputs into the physical computer. For instance, a skin-like sensing surface with localized snap-through cells can act as a mechanical signal amplifiers that translate pressure or contact into discrete mechanical states106. Soft mechanosensors based on bistable structures can provide binary contact information without continuous electrical feedback107 Most importantly (and most relevant to this paper), the bistable mechanism can serve as a mechanical analog to transistors, functioning as one-bit memory units by switching between two stable configurations. These configurations can be mapped to binary states “0” and “1” based on the input force, pressure, or displacement, enabling the construction of logic gates and sequential logic circuits using entirely mechanical components14,108,109,110,111. Therefore, mechanical bi-stability provides a fundamental means to encode, store, and process information within a robot’s physical body. Typically, these robotic algorithmic computers directly borrow the design and architecture of CMOS-based systems, but they can be inherently energy efficient, retaining their state without continuous power input. To better illustrate the working principle, we detail a fluidic and algorithmic computer based on a reprogrammable metamaterial processor (Fig. 4a). The processor comprises identical bistable unit cells whose elastomeric chambers snap at defined pressure thresholds, converting vacuum and atmospheric pressure input into binary states112. As a result, a bistable unit cell with a clever tubing design can function like a resistor, enabling the construction of complex logical circuitry. More specifically Kernel: in the example, the kernel has 24 unit cells that are connected into a soft processor, including two SR latches, a 2–4 demultiplexer, and four ring oscillators (each linked to a soft robotic finger). The soft processor and the fingers are all powered by one constant vacuum pressure. The entire system can reversibly switch between four different operation modes, each of which corresponds to the oscillatory bending of one finger. Input encoding: the operator can choose the operating mode via manually pressing the input cells of the SR latches (input encoding). For example, if the first figure is activated initially, one can press the “S2” cell to activate the second figure and then press the “R2” cell to switch back. The outputs of the two SR latches are sent to the demultiplexer, so these 2 data lines are converted into 4. The resulting four outputs of the demultiplexer serve as the power source for the ring oscillators. Output decoding: the robotic fingers transform the output oscillatory pressures into mechanical bending. Notably, the current operation mode persists even after the removal of the pressing force, owing to the ability of the SR latches to retain their logic states until updated by new inputs. Re-programming: finally, one can re-arrange these fluidic unit cells to construct a new soft processor with different input-output mapping. a Reprogrammable metamaterial processor with robotic fingers: fluidic unit-cells with 0–1 binary states are connected to create mechanical logic circuitry to control finger actions (adapted from ref. 112, CC BY 4.0). b Complementary soft pneumatic valves: Piston-based, four-terminal modules are paired to achieve Boolean logic operation, nonvolatile latches, and analog pressure regulation. Then they are integrated with sub-circuits to create ring oscillators and counters to control crawling robots and wearable devices (adapted from ref. 114, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). c Soft-matter computer: conductive-fluid receptors transduce spatiotemporal fluid patterns into electrical drives, which can realize analog filtering, amplification, and logic gates with simple composition. As a result, such conductive fluidic mechanism enables on-body control for locomotion, reflexive grasping, and behavior switching (image adapted from ref. 121 with permission). Note that all scale bars are approximate. In addition to the example above, there are several other attempts to copy the electronic logic circuitry into the fluidic domain and construct fluid Boolean gates with soft complementary valves, ring oscillators, and modular cells113,114,115,116,117,118,119 (Fig. 4b). Besides the pressurized fluidics, algorithmic computing can also be implemented with other novel materials and multi-stable mechanisms. Here, we list four additional approaches: (1) conductive fluidics: conductive fluidic receptors (CFRs) embedded in soft structures can act as hybrid mechanical-electrical logic units, enabling soft matter computers to perform sensing, logic, and actuation all in one continuous system120,121,122 (Fig. 4c). (2) Magnetic fluidics: magnetic liquid metal droplets can create flexible and reconfigurable logic gates with decoupled input/output channels and multi-modal control using phase-state transitions123. (3) Heat responsive materials: mechanical logic has also been achieved using mechanical and multiplexed switches that integrate bistable beams and thermally responsive materials to perform logic operations and mechanical memory storage112,124,125,126. (4) Multi-stable mechanisms: finally, algorithmic computing is also possible with pure elastic force and deformation. Unique architectures, such as counter-snapping metamaterials, provide logic behavior via geometric nonlinearity, where structural instability enables programmable stiffness transitions and collective switching sequences, making them useful for timing and computation21. Recent advances in modular chiral origami metamaterials further expand this logic repertoire by introducing multi-stable and reprogrammable architectures that can store information through mechanically encoded hysteresis and noncommutative state transitions127. It is worth noting that physical algorithmic computing can also enable locomotion generation and sequencing— locomotion turns out to be the robot task shared by all physical computers reviewed in this study. In this regard, algorithmic computing supports locomotion sequencing through timing control and built-in periodicity. For example, pneumatic ring oscillators and fluidic valve networks, constructed from bistable logic gates, have been used to generate self-sustained actuation cycles for crawling and walking gaits in soft quadrupeds and hexapods114,116,117. Morphologically encoded logic and routing delays, utilizing internal resistance gradients, have also been employed to produce pressure wave propagation and staggered motion, enabling gait generation through a single input channel128. Reconfigurable metamaterials and origami systems offer structural ways to embed sequencing. For instance, modular soft metamaterial robots have been programmed to switch between gaits—turning, serpentine, reciprocating—by physically re-arranging submodules acting as logic units112,117. In another case, origami robots with memory registers and rotating read-heads perform controlled motion paths by storing finite-state instructions mechanically124. Challenges and opportunities of physical algorithmic computing: compared to analog physical computers, algorithmic physical computing is quite versatile in that it can borrow many designs and working principles from well-established CMOS electronics. However, the reviewed examples above lag behind in terms of speed and scaling. Their computing speed is constrained by the relatively slow physical processes, such as pressurizing and venting of fluidic networks, deformation of thick elastomeric chambers, and, in some cases, heat diffusion through responsive materials. Using physical signals instead of electric ones also makes miniaturization more challenging: The finite size of multi-stable unit cells, the need for compliant interconnection devices, and the risk of mechanical crosstalk between unit cells make routing and isolation harder than in CMOS. Therefore, significant research efforts are necessary. For example, using advanced manufacturing technology can help minimize the unit cell size and enable more integrated packaging, thus speeding up physical computers (as we discuss later in Section “perspective for future advancement”). Regardless, physical algorithmic computing is still a desirable choice for small-scale logic and simple on-board control (as we discuss further in the conclusion section). Since this perspective lies at the intersection of physical computing and soft robots, it is intuitive to ask questions about the future direction using the “supply-and-demand” analogy. On the supply side: “are there any newly available capabilities in physical computing that can be deployed for soft robotics?” On demand side: “what additional computing power would future soft robots require?” Here, our unique perspective of dissecting soft robots into the encoding, kernel, and decoding layers can offer a systematic framework to introduce new computing concepts. For example, one can keep the encoding (e.g., sensor and input) and decoding components (e.g., actuator) the same, and “swap” the kernel with different designs that have new kinds of computing capacity. Alternatively, one can “upgrade” the kernel with a more advanced design. By surveying the current physical computing studies, one can discover many unique approaches that could be integrated into soft robots in the future (examples in Fig. 5). One can continue to advance the computing kernel’s density and capacity in soft robots by adopting new strategies to process encoded inputs, either locally or through a centralized kernel. To illustrate some of the promising concepts, we envision an octopus-inspired soft robot with computational capabilities distributed across its tentacles, as well as in its brain, following the mechanical computing framework described in this manuscript. Each component can encode, process, and decode data (with mechanical memory reserved for storage). Starting from the top right tentacle and moving clockwise: bistable soft shells enable rule-changeable logic operations (image adapted from ref. 137 CC BY 4.0); information processing during transmission via nondispersive mechanical solitary waves (image adapted from ref. 139 CC BY 4.0); a mechanical neural network offloads computation and can be attached to the robot’s skin (image adapted from ref. 146 with permission); mechanical analog-to-digital converters can be embedded in the tentacles (image adapted from ref. 33 with permission). In the robot’s brain, miniaturized physical circuits mimic an algorithmic logic unit (ALU) (image adapted from ref. 18 CC BY 4.0). Finally, reprogrammable and nonvolatile mechanical memories can store data either with magnetic (left, image adapted from ref. 134 with permission) or thermal principles (right, image adapted from ref. 132 CC BY 4.0). Note that all scale bars are approximate. Here, we highlight three most promising topics from three different angles: function, scale, and system integration. Regarding the function, the current physical computing has demonstrated an impressive ability to extract information from sensory signals and execute actuation commands. On the other hand, on-board nonvolatile memory, a vital component in modern computing paradigms, has yet to be implemented in soft robots. Regarding scale, the current physical computing in soft robots is relatively large in terms of physical size. Minimizing their scale using high-precision manufacturing techniques might help advance the performance and reliability of physical computers to a new level, addressing some of the challenges in physical computing as we discussed earlier. Finally, regarding systematic integration, the current physical computing setup in soft robots primarily operates in a standalone manner. However, some integration with digital hardware (e.g., for long-distance communication) can enhance the overall capability. Therefore, a meaningful and integrated mechanical-electrical hybrid circuit can be advantageous. In the following section, we present recent studies in these three aspects. An advanced and autonomous robot should also be able to memorize the operator’s instructions or the knowledge from its interaction with the working environment. In this regard, we have seen some promising examples of memory in the mechanical metamaterial domain. That is, by combining responsive materials (memory encoding/decoding) and elastic bistability (storage), mechanical metamaterials can achieve information storage via mechanical bits (m-bits), similar to their digital counterparts. These m-bits can be bistable elastic shell to realize mechano-fluidic memory129, or bistable origami structures130 or tiles of bistable Kirigami units131, forming 2D and 3D storage arrays. Examples include temperature-responsive bistable Kirigami units132,133, which sequentially retrieve stored information in 3D arrays, and magnetic-responsive bistable elastic shell units134, which enable on-demand re-programmability for 2D arrays. These configurations function as nonvolatile mechanical memories and could be used in soft robotics in the future. A key challenge will be designing an integrative approach to encode information from the physical memory into the computing kernel, and subsequently decode and store the computing output into the physical memory device. Just as CMOS-based computers’ never-ending quest to shrink the size of their basic electronic units, soft robots can also benefit from a smaller and more capable physical computer onboard. Early physical algorithmic computers —such as the waterbomb origami with bistable hinges135 — were bulky and limited to AND, OR, and NOT gates. More compact designs like bistable curved beam arrays have introduced NOR and NAND operations136. Bistable soft shells allowed re-programmable mechanologics so that their operation mode can be switched on demand (e.g., from XOR to XNOR)137. Additionally, self-powered origami mechanologics19 and thermal mechanical transistors24 completed the binary logic set with XNOR and XOR gates. More recently, with advancements in sub-millimeter additive manufacturing, small-scale mechanologics based on buckling micro-flexures have emerged18,138. Integrating these mechanologics has led to fully mechanical half-adders19,136,137,138, full-adders19,24,137, and solitary wave-based mechanical computing platforms139. It is not hard to imagine that some of these miniaturized and physical algorithmic units will be integrated into soft robots in the future, enabling fully onboard computation and control. While physical computing aspires to perform computation tasks without complex CMOS-based electronics, it can still benefit from using some simple electronic components. Indeed, the physical reservoir computer reviewed in this study is a mechanical-electric hybrid system, because its readout layer requires electronics to perform weighted linear summation (e.g., using an analog adder circuit with an Op-Amp). This provides the physical reservoir with excellent re-programmability and multi-tasking abilities that are not yet available in analog oscillators or physical algorithmic computers. Therefore, mechanical-electrical hybrid circuits could provide scalable computing capabilities for future soft robots. These hybrid systems convert mechanical input into electrical signals by opening or closing conductive pathways in response to deformation. Applications include mechanical digital sensors140, mechanical analog-to-digital converters (m-ADC)141, and mechanical arithmetic logic units (m-ALU), which embed Boolean logic into soft configurable structures33,142,143. Higher-level computation becomes feasible when memory is integrated into computation, as seen in in-memory mechanical computing platforms, such as mechanical neural networks17 and linear equation solvers144. These hybrid circuits have yet to be integrated into soft robotics, but they present an exciting pathway for systematic integrations. In summary, the convergence of physical computing with soft robotics is a promising strategy for softening and onboarding control. By integrating a physical computing kernel—such as an analog oscillator, a physical reservoir computer, or an algorithmic computer—into a soft robotic system, these robots can achieve sophisticated locomotion and manipulation tasks that would typically require a conventional digital control. For example, this perspective paper demonstrates that an electronics-free legged robot equipped with an analog oscillator can perform coordinated locomotion and reverse direction upon encountering an obstacle. The soft modular manipulator, with inherent PRC capacity, can utilize its body dynamics to estimate the weight and orientation of its payload, enabling it to classify the payload without relying on electronic sensors, such as cameras. Another soft robotic hand integrated with an algorithmic fluidic circuitry that can operate based on abstract Boolean logical rules. However, it is worth noting that all of the physically computing robots in this perspective remain at the proof-of-concept level. Implementing these exciting concepts into practical, real-world use still requires a significant amount of research efforts and system engineering. Despite the rapid advances in this field, it is unlikely that physical computers embedded in soft robots can catch up with digital hardware in terms of computational speed and information density in the foreseeable future. Therefore, it is unrealistic to replace conventional digital hardware entirely with physical computing. Instead, engineers must answer the critical question: “how much should we use physical computing?" “Where to apply them?" and “how can we seamlessly integrate physical computing with conventional digital hardware?" For robots, physical computing is advantageous because of its softness, simplicity, and robustness. Therefore, it makes the most sense to use physical computing in the following three scenarios. (1) The targeted tasks are closely related to the robot’s physical body—this is why we have seen great success in locomotion generation and information extraction via direct physical interaction (using PRC). (2) The robots need to be small and entirely soft—because physical computing could seamlessly integrate with the soft robotic body without the complexity of adding electronic components (e.g., using advanced 3D printing). (3) The working conditions are demanding—for example, fluidics-based computation is desirable for underwater operations, where electronics are vulnerable to damage. On the other hand, conventional digital electronics is more suitable for “over the distance” tasks, such as obstacle avoidance using vision data or long-distance communication with operators. Therefore, the future of physically computing robots hinges upon two pillars: the continual advances in physical computing and its strategic integration with conventional digital hardware. As we discussed in Section “perspective for future advancement”, in the foreseeable future, we are likely to witnessf the creation of more powerful physical computing thanks to miniaturization and integrated memory capacity. With a more advanced physical computing kernel, a soft robot can acquire information from interacting with the surrounding environment, memorize the acquired knowledge, and execute the action plan, all in a highly integrated mechanical domain. On the other hand, new strategies will emerge to tightly integrate physical computing with digital computing via novel mechanical-electrical hybrid circuits, enabling physical computing robots to operate within large-scale automated systems. This vision of soft robots hinges on the ongoing convergence of various engineering disciplines, including mechanical metamaterials, computing theory, advanced manufacturing, and interdisciplinary design. El-Atab, N. et al. Soft actuators for soft robotic applications: a review. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2, 2000128 (2020). Article Google Scholar Rus, D. & Tolley, M. T. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 521, 467–475 (2015). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Wang, H., Totaro, M. & Beccai, L. Toward perceptive soft robots: progress and challenges. Adv. Sci. 5, 1800541 (2018). Article Google Scholar Aubin, C. A. et al. Towards enduring autonomous robots via embodied energy. Nature 602, 393–402 (2022). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Cianchetti, M., Laschi, C., Menciassi, A. & Dario, P. Biomedical applications of soft robotics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 143–153 (2018). Article ADS Google Scholar Li, G. et al. Self-powered soft robot in the Mariana Trench. Nature 591, 66–71 (2021). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Saranli, U., Buehler, M. & Koditschek, D. E. Rhex: a simple and highly mobile hexapod robot. Int. J. Robot. Res. 20, 616–631 (2001). Article Google Scholar Becker, K. et al. Active entanglement enables stochastic, topological grasping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2209819119 (2022). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Blickhan, R. et al. Intelligence by mechanics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365, 199–220 (2007). Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar Hauser, H., Ijspeert, A. J., Füchslin, R. M., Pfeifer, R. & Maass, W. Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies. Biol. Cybern. 105, 355–370 (2011). Article MathSciNet PubMed Google Scholar Müller, V. C. & Hoffmann, M. What is morphological computation? On how the body contributes to cognition and control. Artif. Life 23, 1–24 (2017). Article PubMed Google Scholar Chen, B., Nam, J. & Kim, M. Advances in metamaterials for mechanical computing. APL Electronic Devices 1, 021502 (2025). Alù, A. et al. Roadmap on embodying mechano-intelligence and computing in functional materials and structures. Smart Mater. Struct. 34, 063501 (2025). Article ADS Google Scholar Yasuda, H. et al. Mechanical computing. Nature. 598, 39–48 (2021). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zangeneh-Nejad, F., Sounas, D. L., Alù, A. & Fleury, R. Analogue computing with metamaterials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 207–225 (2021). Article ADS Google Scholar Qian, C., Kaminer, I. & Chen, H. A guidance to intelligent metamaterials and metamaterials intelligence. Nat. Commun. 16, 1154 (2025). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Mei, T. & Chen, C. Q. In-memory mechanical computing. Nat. Commun. 14, 5204 (2023). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Song, Y. et al. Additively manufacturable micro-mechanical logic gates. Nat. Commun. 10, 882 (2019). Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Zhang, Q. et al. Meta-mechanotronics for self-powered computation. Mater. Today 65, 78–89 (2023). Article Google Scholar Liu, Z., Fang, H., Xu, J. & Wang, K.-W. Cellular automata inspired multistable origami metamaterials for mechanical learning. Adv. Sci. 10, 2305146 (2023). Article Google Scholar Ducarme, P., Weber, B., van Hecke, M. & Overvelde, J. T. Exotic mechanical properties enabled by countersnapping instabilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2423301122 (2025). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Rajappan, A. et al. Logic-enabled textiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2202118119 (2022). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar El-Atab, N., Canas, J. C. & Hussain, M. M. Pressure-driven two-input 3d microfluidic logic gates. Adv. Sci. 7, 1903027 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar Chen, H. et al. Thermal computing with mechanical transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2401244 (2024). Article CAS Google Scholar Mousa, M. & Nouh, M. Parallel mechanical computing: metamaterials that can multitask. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2407431121 (2024). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Dorin, P. & Wang, K.-W. Embodiment of parallelizable mechanical logic utilizing multimodal higher-order topological states. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 284, 109697 (2024). Article Google Scholar Bilal, O. R., Foehr, A. & Daraio, C. Bistable metamaterial for switching and cascading elastic vibrations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4603–4606 (2017). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Silva, A. et al. Performing mathematical operations with metamaterials. Science 343, 160–163 (2014). Article ADS MathSciNet CAS PubMed Google Scholar Tzarouchis, D. C., Edwards, B. & Engheta, N. Programmable wave-based analog computing machine: a metastructure that designs metastructures. Nat. Commun. 16, 908 (2025). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Zangeneh-Nejad, F. & Fleury, R. Performing mathematical operations using high-index acoustic metamaterials. New J. Phys. 20, 073001 (2018). Article ADS Google Scholar Hauser, H., Ijspeert, A. J., Füchslin, R. M., Pfeifer, R. & Maass, W. The role of feedback in morphological computation with compliant bodies. Biol. Cybern. 106, 595–613 (2012). Article MathSciNet PubMed Google Scholar Louvet, T., Omidvar, P. & Serra-Garcia, M. Reprogrammable, in-materia matrix-vector multiplication with floppy modes. Adv. Intell. Syst. 7, 2500062 (2025). El Helou, C., Grossmann, B., Tabor, C. E., Buskohl, P. R. & Harne, R. L. Mechanical integrated circuit materials. Nature 608, 699–703 (2022). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Zolfagharinejad, M. et al. Analogue speech recognition based on physical computing. Nature 645, 886–892 (2025). Chen, H. & Metin, S. Physical intelligence in small‐scale robots and machines. Advanced Materials 38, e10332 (2026). Chen, C. et al. Advancing physical intelligence for autonomous soft robots. Sci. Robot. 10, eads1292 (2025). Article PubMed Google Scholar Mengaldo, G. et al. A concise guide to modelling the physics of embodied intelligence in soft robotics. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 595–610 (2022). Article Google Scholar Milana, E., Santina, C. D., Gorissen, B. & Rothemund, P. Physical control: a new avenue to achieve intelligence in soft robotics. Sci. Robot. 10, eadw7660 (2025). Article PubMed Google Scholar Horsman, D., Stepney, S., Wagner, R. C. & Kendon, V. When does a physical system compute? Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 470, 20140182 (2014). ADS Google Scholar McGeer, T. et al. Passive dynamic walking. Int. J. Robot. Res. 9, 62–82 (1990). Article Google Scholar Brown, E. et al. Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18809–18814 (2010). Article ADS CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar Reijniers, J., Vanderelst, D. & Peremans, H. Morphology-induced information transfer in bat sonar. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 148701 (2010). Article ADS PubMed Google Scholar Jaeger, H. Towards a generalized theory comprising digital, neuromorphic and unconventional computing. Neuromorphic Comput. Eng. 1, 012002 (2021). Article Google Scholar Jaeger, H., Noheda, B. & Van Der Wiel, W. G. Toward a formal theory for computing machines made out of whatever physics offers. Nat. Commun. 14, 4911 (2023). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Hammack, B., Kranz, S. & Carpenter, B. Albert Michelson’s Harmonic Analyzer: a Visual Tour of a Nineteenth Century Machine that Performs Fourier Analysis (Articulate Noise Books, 2014). Swade, D. & Babbage, C. Difference Engine: Charles Babbage and the Quest to Build the First Computer (Viking Penguin, 2001). Zhang, J., Guo, Y., Hu, W. & Sitti, M. Wirelessly actuated thermo-and magneto-responsive soft bimorph materials with programmable shape-morphing. Adv. Mater. 33, 2100336 (2021). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar He, Q. et al. A modular strategy for distributed, embodied control of electronics-free soft robots. Sci. Adv. 9, eade9247 (2023). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wang, T. et al. A versatile jellyfish-like robotic platform for effective underwater propulsion and manipulation. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg0292 (2023). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Fan, X., Dong, X., Karacakol, A. C., Xie, H. & Sitti, M. Reconfigurable multifunctional ferrofluid droplet robots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 27916–27926 (2020). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wang, Y. et al. 3D-printed photoresponsive liquid crystal elastomer composites for free-form actuation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2210614 (2023). Article CAS Google Scholar Luo, D. et al. Autonomous self-burying seed carriers for aerial seeding. Nature 614, 463–470 (2023). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Rodrigue, H., Wang, W., Han, M.-W., Kim, T. J. & Ahn, S.-H. An overview of shape memory alloy-coupled actuators and robots. Soft Robot. 4, 3–15 (2017). Article PubMed Google Scholar Guo, Y., Liu, L., Liu, Y. & Leng, J. Review of dielectric elastomer actuators and their applications in soft robots. Adv. Intell. Syst. 3, 2000282 (2021). Article Google Scholar Wu, S., Hong, Y., Zhao, Y., Yin, J. & Zhu, Y. Caterpillar-inspired soft crawling robot with distributed programmable thermal actuation. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf8014 (2023). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Zhao, Y. et al. Stimuli-responsive polymers for soft robotics. Annu. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst. 5, 515–545 (2022). Article Google Scholar Shen, Z., Chen, F., Zhu, X., Yong, K.-T. & Gu, G. Stimuli-responsive functional materials for soft robotics. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 8972–8991 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar Boyvat, M. & Sitti, M. Remote modular electronics for wireless magnetic devices. Adv. Sci. 8, 2101198 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar Ke, X. et al. Synergistical mechanical design and function integration for insect-scale on-demand configurable multifunctional soft magnetic robots. Soft Robot. 11, 43–56 (2024). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Soon, R. H. et al. Pangolin-inspired untethered magnetic robot for on-demand biomedical heating applications. Nat. Commun. 14, 3320 (2023). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wang, T. et al. Adaptive wireless millirobotic locomotion into distal vasculature. Nat. Commun. 13, 4465 (2022). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Mu, W. et al. Spiral-shape fast-moving soft robots. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2300516 (2023). Article CAS Google Scholar He, Q. et al. Modular stimuli-responsive valves for pneumatic soft robots. Adv. Intell. Syst. 7, 2400659 (2025). Sitti, M. Physical intelligence as a new paradigm. Extreme Mech. Lett. 46, 101340 (2021). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Li, Y., Li, Z., Duan, Y. & Spulber, A.-B. Physical artificial intelligence (pai): the next-generation artificial intelligence. Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng. 24, 1231–1238 (2023). Article ADS Google Scholar Dickinson, M. H. et al. How animals move: an integrative view. Science 288, 100–106 (2000). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar MacKay-Lyons, M. Central pattern generation of locomotion: a review of the evidence. Phys. Ther. 82, 69–83 (2002). Article PubMed Google Scholar Ijspeert, A. J. Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: a review. Neural Netw. 21, 642–653 (2008). Article ADS PubMed Google Scholar Zhou, Q., Xu, J. & Fang, H. A CPG-based versatile control framework for metameric earthworm-like robotic locomotion. Adv. Sci. 10, 2206336 (2023). Article Google Scholar Drotman, D., Jadhav, S., Sharp, D., Chan, C. & Tolley, M. T. Electronics-free pneumatic circuits for controlling soft-legged robots. Sci. Robot. 6, eaay2627 (2021). Article PubMed Google Scholar Goswami, D., Liu, S., Pal, A., Silva, L. G. & Martinez, R. V. 3D-architected soft machines with topologically encoded motion. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1808713 (2019). Article Google Scholar Zhao, Y. et al. Twisting for soft intelligent autonomous robot in unstructured environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2200265119 (2022). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yang, X., Chang, L. & Pérez-Arancibia, N. O. An 88-milligram insect-scale autonomous crawling robot driven by a catalytic artificial muscle. Sci. Robot. 5, eaba0015 (2020). Article PubMed Google Scholar Chen, G. et al. A non-electrical pneumatic hybrid oscillator for high-frequency multimodal robotic locomotion. Nat. Commun. 16, 1449 (2025). Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Zhou, Z. & Li, S. Self-sustained and coordinated rhythmic deformations with SMA for controller-free locomotion. Adv. Intell. Syst. 6, 2300667 (2024). Article Google Scholar Wehner, M. et al. An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 536, 451–455 (2016). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Kotikian, A. et al. Untethered soft robotic matter with passive control of shape morphing and propulsion. Sci. Robot. 4, eaax7044 (2019). Article PubMed Google Scholar Mousa, M., Rezanejad, A., Gorissen, B. & Forte, A. E. Frequency-controlled fluidic oscillators for soft robots. Adv. Sci. 11, 2408879 (2024). Article CAS Google Scholar van Laake, L. C. & Overvelde, J. T. B. Bio-inspired autonomy in soft robots. Commun. Mater. 5, 198 (2024). Article Google Scholar Comoretto, A., Schomaker, H. A. & Overvelde, J. T. Physical synchronization of soft self-oscillating limbs for fast and autonomous locomotion. Science 388, 610–615 (2025). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Pitti, A., Austin, M., Nakajima, K. & Kuniyoshi, Y. Informational embodiment: computational role of information structure in codes and robots. Phys. Life Rev. 53, 262–276 (2025). Hauser, H. Physical reservoir computing in robotics. Reservoir Computing: Theory, Physical Implementations, and Applications, 169–190 (Springer, 2021). Wang, J. & Suyi, L. Embodied multi-modal sensing with a soft modular arm powered by physical reservoir computing. In 2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 17658–17664 (IEEE, 2025). Wang, J., Qiao, Z., Zhang, W. & Li, S. Proprioceptive and exteroceptive information perception in a fabric soft robotic arm via physical reservoir computing with minimal training data. Adv. Intell. Syst. 7, 2400534 (2025). Article Google Scholar Yoshimura, K. & Hasegawa, T. Research on tactile sensation by physical reservoir computing with a robot arm and a Ag2S reservoir. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 63, 03SP17 (2024). Article CAS Google Scholar Tayama, Y., Furukawa, H. & Ogawa, J. Development of a soft robot with locomotion mechanism and physical reservoir computing for mimicking gastropods. J. Robot. Mechatron. 37, 105–113 (2025). Article Google Scholar Tanaka, K. et al. Flapping-wing dynamics as a natural detector of wind direction. Adv. Intell. Syst. 3, 2000174 (2021). Article Google Scholar Shougat, M. R. E. U., Kennedy, S. & Perkins, E. A self-sensing shape memory alloy actuator physical reservoir computer. IEEE Sens. Lett. 7, 1–4 (2023). Article Google Scholar Zhao, Q., Nakajima, K., Sumioka, H., Hauser, H. & Pfeifer, R. Spine dynamics as a computational resource in spine-driven quadruped locomotion. In Proc. 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1445–1451 (IEEE, 2013). Nakajima, K., Li, T., Hauser, H. & Pfeifer, R. Exploiting short-term memory in soft body dynamics as a computational resource. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140437 (2014). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Eder, M., Hisch, F. & Hauser, H. Morphological computation-based control of a modular, pneumatically driven, soft robotic arm. Adv. Robot. 32, 375–385 (2018). Article Google Scholar Caluwaerts, K., D’Haene, M., Verstraeten, D. & Schrauwen, B. Locomotion without a brain: physical reservoir computing in tensegrity structures. Artif. life. 19, 35–66 (2013). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Bhovad, P. & Li, S. Physical reservoir computing with origami and its application to robotic crawling. Sci. Rep. 11, 13002 (2021). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Horii, Y. et al. Physical reservoir computing in a soft swimming robot. In Proc. ALIFE 2021: the 2021 Conference on Artificial Life (MIT Press, 2021). Chen, T., Bilal, O. R., Shea, K. & Daraio, C. Harnessing bistability for directional propulsion of soft, untethered robots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5698–5702 (2018). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Raney, J. R. et al. Stable propagation of mechanical signals in soft media using stored elastic energy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9722–9727 (2016). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Rothemund, P. et al. A soft, bistable valve for autonomous control of soft actuators. Sci. Robot. 3, eaar7986 (2018). Article PubMed Google Scholar Patel, D. K. et al. Highly dynamic bistable soft actuator for reconfigurable multimodal soft robots. Adv. Mater. Technol. 8, 2201259 (2023). Article Google Scholar Huang, C. et al. Bistable programmable origami based soft electricity generator with inter-well modulation. Nano Energy 103, 107775 (2022). Article CAS Google Scholar Kaufmann, J., Bhovad, P. & Li, S. Harnessing the multistability of kresling origami for reconfigurable articulation in soft robotic arms. Soft Robot. 9, 212–223 (2022). Article PubMed Google Scholar Pal, A., Restrepo, V., Goswami, D. & Martinez, R. V. Exploiting mechanical instabilities in soft robotics: control, sensing, and actuation. Adv. Mater. 33, 2006939 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar Tang, Y. et al. Leveraging elastic instabilities for amplified performance: spine-inspired high-speed and high-force soft robots. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz6912 (2020). Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Gorissen, B., Melancon, D., Vasios, N., Torbati, M. & Bertoldi, K. Inflatable soft jumper inspired by shell snapping. Sci. Robot. 5, eabb1967 (2020). Article PubMed Google Scholar Chi, Y., Hong, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, Y. & Yin, J. Snapping for high-speed and high-efficient butterfly stroke–like soft swimmer. Sci. Adv. 8, eadd3788 (2022). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Faber, J. A., Udani, J. P., Riley, K. S., Studart, A. R. & Arrieta, A. F. Dome-patterned metamaterial sheets. Adv. Sci. 7, 2001955 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar Le Ferrand, H., Studart, A. R. & Arrieta, A. F. Filtered mechanosensing using snapping composites with embedded mechano-electrical transduction. ACS Nano 13, 4752–4760 (2019). Article PubMed Google Scholar Thuruthel, T. G., Abidi, S. H., Cianchetti, M., Laschi, C. & Falotico, E. A bistable soft gripper with mechanically embedded sensing and actuation for fast grasping. In Proc. 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 1049–1054 (IEEE, 2020). Ramachandran, V., Bartlett, M. D., Wissman, J. & Majidi, C. Elastic instabilities of a ferroelastomer beam for soft reconfigurable electronics. Extreme Mech. Lett. 9, 282–290 (2016). Article Google Scholar Holmes, D. P., Tavakol, B., Froehlicher, G. & Stone, H. A. Control and manipulation of microfluidic flow via elastic deformations. Soft Matter 9, 7049–7053 (2013). Article ADS CAS Google Scholar Yang, B., Wang, B. & Schomburg, W. K. A thermopneumatically actuated bistable microvalve. J. Micromech. Microeng. 20, 095024 (2010). Article ADS Google Scholar Maffli, L., Rosset, S. & Shea, H. R. Mm-size bistable zipping dielectric elastomer actuators for integrated microfluidics. In Proc. Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 2013, Vol. 8687, 86872M (SPIE, 2013). Jiao, Z. et al. Reprogrammable metamaterial processors for soft machines. Adv. Sci. 11, 2305501 (2024). Article CAS Google Scholar Song, S., Joshi, S. & Paik, J. Cmos-inspired complementary fluidic circuits for soft robots. Adv. Sci. 8, 2100924 (2021). Article Google Scholar Decker, C. J. et al. Programmable soft valves for digital and analog control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2205922119 (2022). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Tracz, J. A. et al. Tube-balloon logic for the exploration of fluidic control elements. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 7, 5483–5488 (2022). Article Google Scholar Conrad, S. et al. 3D-printed digital pneumatic logic for the control of soft robotic actuators. Sci. Robot. 9, eadh4060 (2024). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Liu, Z., Fang, H., Xu, J. & Wang, K.-W. Discriminative transition sequences of origami metamaterials for mechanologic. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2200146 (2023). Article Google Scholar Mahon, S. T., Buchoux, A., Sayed, M. E., Teng, L. & Stokes, A. A. Soft robots for extreme environments: removing electronic control. In Proc. 2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), 782–787 (IEEE, 2019). Stanley, A. A., Roby, E. S. & Keller, S. J. High-speed fluidic processing circuits for dynamic control of haptic and robotic systems. Sci. Adv. 10, eadl3014 (2024). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Bartlett, N. W. et al. A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion. Science 349, 161–165 (2015). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Garrad, M., Soter, G., Conn, A., Hauser, H. & Rossiter, J. A soft matter computer for soft robots. Sci. Robot. 4, eaaw6060 (2019). Article PubMed Google Scholar Yue, T. et al. Embodying soft robots with octopus-inspired hierarchical suction intelligence. Sci. Robot. 10, eadr4264 (2025). Article PubMed Google Scholar Xu, Y., Zhu, J., Chen, H., Yong, H. & Wu, Z. A soft reconfigurable circulator enabled by magnetic liquid metal droplet for multifunctional control of soft robots. Adv. Sci. 10, 2300935 (2023). Article CAS Google Scholar Yan, W. et al. Origami-based integration of robots that sense, decide, and respond. Nat. Commun. 14, 1553 (2023). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Li, Z., Myung, N. V. & Yin, Y. Light-powered soft steam engines for self-adaptive oscillation and biomimetic swimming. Sci. Robot. 6, eabi4523 (2021). Article PubMed Google Scholar Yang, J., Wang, H., Lou, L. & Meng, Z. A review of chitosan-based electrospun nanofibers for food packaging: from fabrication to function and modeling insights. Nanomaterials 15, 1274 (2025). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Zhao, T. et al. Modular chiral origami metamaterials. Nature 640, 931–940 (2025). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Matia, Y. et al. Harnessing nonuniform pressure distributions in soft robotic actuators. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5, 2200330 (2023). Article Google Scholar Comoretto, A. et al. Embodying mechano-fluidic memory in soft machines to program behaviors upon interactions. Device 3, 100863 (2025). Yasuda, H., Tachi, T., Lee, M. & Yang, J. Origami-based tunable truss structures for non-volatile mechanical memory operation. Nat. Commun. 8, 962 (2017). Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Xin, L., Li, Y., Wang, B. & Li, Z. Magnetic poles enabled kirigami meta-structure for high-efficiency mechanical memory storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2310969 (2024). Article CAS Google Scholar Meng, Z. et al. Encoding and storage of information in mechanical metamaterials. Adv. Sci. 10, 2301581 (2023). Article Google Scholar Yang, H., Qi, H. & Pasini, D. Role of geometric gradients and size effects in multi-shape memory kirigami metamaterials. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 68, 266 (2025). Article Google Scholar Chen, T., Pauly, M. & Reis, P. M. A reprogrammable mechanical metamaterial with stable memory. Nature 589, 386–390 (2021). Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar Meng, Z. et al. Bistability-based foldable origami mechanical logic gates. Extreme Mech. Lett. 43, 101180 (2021). Article Google Scholar Mei, T., Meng, Z., Zhao, K. & Chen, C. Q. A mechanical metamaterial with reprogrammable logical functions. Nat. Commun. 12, 7234 (2021). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Yang, N. et al. Bistable soft shells for programmable mechanical logic. Adv. Sci. 12, 2412372 (2025). Article Google Scholar Yue, C. et al. A flexibly function-oriented assembly mechanical metamaterial. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2316181 (2024). Article CAS Google Scholar Byun, J., Pal, A., Ko, J. & Sitti, M. Integrated mechanical computing for autonomous soft machines. Nat. Commun. 15, 2933 (2024). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Nick, Z. H., Tabor, C. E. & Harne, R. L. Liquid metal microchannels as digital sensors in mechanical metamaterials. Extreme Mech. Lett. 40, 100871 (2020). Article Google Scholar Hyatt, L. P. & Harne, R. L. Programming metastable transition sequences in digital mechanical materials. Extreme Mech. Lett. 59, 101975 (2023). Article Google Scholar El Helou, C., Buskohl, P. R., Tabor, C. E. & Harne, R. L. Digital logic gates in soft, conductive mechanical metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 12, 1633 (2021). Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Xi, K. et al. A kinematically bifurcated metamaterial for integrated logic operation and computing. Adv. Sci. 12, e09829 (2025). El Helou, C., Hyatt, L. P., Buskohl, P. R. & Harne, R. L. Intelligent electroactive material systems with self-adaptive mechanical memory and sequential logic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2317340121 (2024). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Wang, J. & Li, S. Re-purposing a modular origami manipulator into an adaptive physical computer for machine learning and robotic perception. Adv. Sci. 12, e09389 (2025). Hopkins, J. B., Lee, R. H. & Sainaghi, P. Using binary-stiffness beams within mechanical neural-network metamaterials to learn. Smart Mater. Struct. 32, 035015 (2023). Article ADS Google Scholar Download references The authors acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (CMMI-2312422, 2328522, EFRI-2422340) and Virginia Tech (via the Startup Fund and a Graduate Student Assistantship). These authors contributed equally: Jun Wang, Ziyang Zhou, Ardalan Kahak. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA Jun Wang, Ziyang Zhou, Ardalan Kahak & Suyi Li Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar J.W., Z.Z., and A.K. contributed equally to this work and jointly conceived the core ideas, reviewed the relevant literature. They collaboratively developed the figures and prepared Sections 2–5 of the manuscript. S.L. supervised the research, guided the conceptual framework, wrote the introduction and summary, secured funding, and contributed to manuscript editing and final approval. Correspondence to Jun Wang or Suyi Li. The authors declare no competing interests. Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Reprints and permissions Wang, J., Zhou, Z., Kahak, A. et al. Embodying physical computing into soft robots. Nat Commun 17, 2455 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70866-6 Download citation Received: 12 October 2025 Accepted: 06 March 2026 Published: 15 March 2026 Version of record: 16 March 2026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70866-6 Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative Advertisement Nature Communications (Nat Commun) ISSN 2041-1723 (online) © 2026 Springer Nature Limited Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Le Prime Day d’Automne réserve cette année de belles surprises à ceux qui souhaitent s’équiper en robots de nettoyage dernier cri. Narwal, leader mondial des robots aspirateurs intelligents, propose des offres irrésistibles. Découvrez comment profiter de ces promotions exclusives et des innovations qui facilitent vraiment le quotidien. Pour le Prime Day, Narwal offre jusqu’à 720 € d’économies sur ses modèles phare. Ces remises sont disponibles du 7 au 12 octobre sur Amazon et sur la boutique officielle de la marque. Les clients peuvent choisir parmi plusieurs robots avec différentes fonctionnalités avancées. En prime, les packs exclusifs sur le site incluent deux ans d’accessoires supplémentaires. Il s’agit d’une occasion unique d’acquérir un robot intelligent à un prix imbattable. La gamme Narwal brille par sa technologie et sa facilité d’utilisation. Parmi les modèles en promotion : Tous les modèles intègrent des technologies pratiques comme le lavage automatique, la stérilisation des serpillières ou l’évitement intelligent des obstacles. Ainsi, ils répondent aux besoins des familles modernes et actives. En plus des offres, Narwal propose un jeu concours exclusif pour le Prime Day. Il permet de gagner des robots Freo Z10, des coffrets cadeaux ou d’autres lots étonnants. Chaque participant repart avec un cadeau, ce qui renforce l’expérience client. Pour jouer, il suffit de se rendre sur le site officiel Narwal et de suivre les instructions pour tenter sa chance. Grâce au Prime Day Narwal, il n’a jamais été aussi facile d’équiper son foyer avec des robots intelligents et de profiter d’une maison toujours propre. Entre réductions importantes, accessoires offerts et jeu concours, Narwal s’impose comme la référence de l’entretien du sol pour un quotidien plus simple et agréable. Saisissez ces offres pour découvrir les avantages des robots aspirateurs nouvelle génération ! Lisez notre dernier article tech : Test – AAWireless Two : l’adaptateur Android Auto sans fil qui libère vos trajets Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec * Commentaire * Nom * E-mail * Δ

SAN JOSÉ, Calif., March 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Universal Robots (UR) this week unveiled the UR AI Trainer at GTC 2026. Developed in collaboration with Scale AI, the AI Trainer marks a shift as robots move from pre-programmed applications to fully AI-driven tasks. “Our customers, ranging from large enterprises to AI research labs, are no longer just asking for AI features,” said Anders Beck, VP of AI Robotics Products at Universal Robots. “They need a way to collect high-fidelity, synchronized robot and vision data to train AI models on the same robots they intend to deploy. Our AI Trainer is the industry’s first direct lab-to-factory solution for AI model training.” Enabling AI-ready data capture AI robotics training is often hindered by fragmented hardware and low-fidelity data capture. Today’s training data is collected on research robots not suited for production environments, and many systems rely only on visual feedback, making delicate or contact-rich tasks difficult. “The AI Trainer directly addresses these barriers,” said Beck. “By utilizing our unique Direct Torque Control and force feedback features, we give developers direct influence over how the robot physically interacts with the world, training on the same robust hardware used in over 100,000 industrial deployments.” Scale AI partnership enables a flywheel of integrated robotics data The UR AI Trainer lets human operators guide UR robots through tasks in a leader-follower setup, capturing high-quality synchronized multimodal data during real-time demonstrations, creating the structured datasets needed to train Vision-Language-Action (VLA). Running on UR’s AI Accelerator platform, the AI Trainer combines collaborative industrial robots with Scale AI software to enable scalable data capture in production environments, supporting continuous optimization of physical AI systems. “Universal Robots is a leader in industrial robotics, and its global footprint offers the ideal foundation for data capture and AI deployment,” said Ben Levin, General Manager, Physical AI at Scale AI. “Together, we’ve created an integrated robotics data flywheel, allowing customers to train, deploy, and improve their AI models faster than ever before.” UR and Scale AI will release a large-scale industrial dataset collected on UR robots later this year. Experience AI Trainer at GTC Visitors to UR’s GTC booth can guide two UR3e ‘leader’ robots providing haptic input to control two UR7e ‘follower’ robots. The setup enables visitors to perform advanced smartphone packaging with haptic feedback for imitation learning and VLA training, with demonstration data recorded in real time on Scale’s stack and replayable directly on the AI Trainer. The process of capturing robot training data for AI models is complemented by an embodied foundation model demo with Generalist AI and a haptics-based training demo with Haply Robotics. Read more on the UR website. See image collection here. About Universal Robots is a global leader in collaborative robotics (cobots), used across a wide range of industries. With over 100,000 cobots sold worldwide, our user-friendly platform is supported by intuitive PolyScope software, award-winning training, comprehensive services, and the world’s largest cobot ecosystem, delivering innovation and choice to our customers. Universal Robots is part of Teradyne Robotics, a division of Teradyne (NASDAQ: TER), a leading supplier of automatic test equipment and advanced robotics technology. Scale AI‘s mission is to develop reliable AI systems for the world’s most important decisions. We provide high-quality data that powers the world’s AI models, and we help enterprises and governments build, deploy, and oversee AI applications that create real impact. Through our research and Safety, Evaluations, and Alignment Lab (SEAL), we test models with rigorous benchmarks and novel research to help ensure AI is developed in ways people can trust. Founded in 2016, Scale is headquartered in San Francisco. View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/universal-robots-and-scale-ai-launch-imitation-learning-system-to-accelerate-ai-model-training-bridging-the-lab-to-factory-gap-302717348.html SOURCE Universal Robots ​ Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Comment * Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Copyright © 2024 Money Compass Media (M) Sdn Bhd. All Rights Reserved Login to your account below Remember Me Please enter your username or email address to reset your password. Copyright © 2024 Money Compass Media (M) Sdn Bhd. All Rights Reserved